Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Processor U303L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 211TE holds a decisive performance advantage over the Intel Processor U303L, though direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are limited due to missing recorded scores for the U303L. The Core 5 211TE delivers benchmark results that place it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs, while the U303L sits at the 50th percentile, indicating a substantial gap in overall capability.

The Core 5 211TE achieves an average benchmark score of 15370, which places it nearly level with the AMD EPYC 7543 (15477, 0.7% faster) and ahead of the AMD EPYC 7702P (15130, 1.6% slower). It trails the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U (15682, 2% faster) and leads the Intel Core i3-1315U (15022, 2.3% slower). These rival comparisons demonstrate that the Core 5 211TE competes in a performance class well above what a 5-core, 6-thread mobile processor would typically achieve.

Multi-core performance shows the Core 5 211TE's strength. Cinebench R23 multicore results reach 12201 points, while Cinebench R20 multicore scores hit 5124 and Cinebench R15 multicore records 1229. The single-core results are equally notable: Cinebench R23 single-core scores 1722, R20 single-core scores 723, and R15 single-core scores 173. These figures indicate strong per-thread performance for a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor.

PassMark results for the Core 5 211TE reinforce its multi-threaded capabilities. Integer math scores 33991, floating-point math reaches 26150, and extended instructions hit 8615. The multithread score of 11685 and physics score of 1278 demonstrate consistent throughput across varied workloads. Data compression scores 133434, random string sorting reaches 14838, and data encryption records 7231. The find prime numbers test yields 72, and single-thread performance registers 1408.

The U303L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, making direct numerical comparison impossible. Its 5-core, 6-thread configuration with a 1.20 GHz base clock and 2.60 GHz boost clock suggests it operates in a significantly lower performance tier. The Core 5 211TE's 10 cores, 16 threads, 1.70 GHz base clock, and 4.80 GHz boost clock provide a structural advantage that the benchmark data confirms.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation, while the U303L uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process node and manufactured by Intel, but they target different market segments. The Core 5 211TE is a desktop processor, while the U303L is designed for mobile platforms.

Core configuration differs substantially. The Core 5 211TE offers 10 cores and 16 threads, while the U303L provides 5 cores and 6 threads. Clock speeds favor the Core 5 211TE with a 1.70 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock versus the U303L's 1.20 GHz base and 2.60 GHz boost. Thermal design power also separates them: the Core 5 211TE is rated at 45 watts, while the U303L is rated at 15 watts, reflecting their desktop versus mobile design targets.

Cache architecture shows both similarities and differences. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache differs significantly: the Core 5 211TE provides 20 MB shared, while the U303L offers 12 MB shared. Die size is recorded for the Core 5 211TE at 215 mm², but no die size is listed for the U303L.

Memory support is identical in type: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The Core 5 211TE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure exists for the U303L. ECC memory support also differs: the Core 5 211TE supports ECC memory, while the U303L does not.

PCIe capabilities separate the two. The Core 5 211TE uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the U303L uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 5 211TE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the U303L includes UHD Graphics 96EU. Both processors use Intel Socket 1700, have locked multipliers, and are currently in active production.

The Core 5 211TE launched on 2025-01-12 with a launch MSRP of $221. The U303L launched on 2024-04-07 with a launch MSRP of $285. Part numbers are SRQDL for the Core 5 211TE and SRPKEQ5CV for the U303L.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor U303L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: How do their clock speeds compare?

A: The Core 5 211TE operates at a 1.70 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock. The U303L operates at a 1.20 GHz base clock and 2.60 GHz boost clock.

Q: What are the L3 cache sizes?

A: The Core 5 211TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The U303L has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core 5 211TE supports ECC memory. The U303L does not support ECC memory.

Q: What PCIe generations and lane counts do they use?

A: The Core 5 211TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The U303L uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Core 5 211TE has an average benchmark score of 15370. The U303L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 211TE | Intel Processor U303L |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 5 |

| Threads | 16 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 1.70 GHz | 1.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 15 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Architecture | Not specified | Raptor Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | Not specified |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not specified |

| ECC Memory | Supported | Not supported |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 96EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-04-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $285 |

| Part Number | SRQDL | SRPKEQ5CV |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 69 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 15370 | 0 |

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the Intel Core 5 211TE is the superior processor for compute-intensive workloads. Its 10 cores, 16 threads, higher clock speeds, and larger L3 cache produce benchmark results that place it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 5 211TE's average benchmark score of 15370 puts it in direct competition with server-class processors like the AMD EPYC 7543 and AMD EPYC 7702P, while also exceeding the Intel Core i3-1315U by 2.3%.

The Intel Processor U303L occupies a different performance tier entirely. With 5 cores, 6 threads, and significantly lower clock speeds, it sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs. The lack of recorded benchmark scores for the U303L means its real-world performance cannot be quantified from the database, but its structural specifications indicate a processor designed for power efficiency rather than peak throughput.

The Core 5 211TE targets desktop users who need substantial multi-threaded performance for demanding applications. Its 45-watt TDP, PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes, and ECC memory capability position it for workstation-class usage. The U303L targets mobile users who prioritize battery life and thermal efficiency, reflected in its 15-watt TDP and PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes.

The launch MSRP data shows the Core 5 211TE at $221 and the U303L at $285, though pricing considerations are secondary to the performance differential. The Core 5 211TE delivers significantly more compute capability while carrying a lower launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211TE wins in every benchmark category where data exists. Its multi-core performance, demonstrated by Cinebench R23 multicore at 12201, Cinebench R20 multicore at 5124, and Cinebench R15 multicore at 1229, makes it suitable for rendering, video encoding, compilation, and other parallel workloads. The PassMark results confirm this strength: integer math at 33991, floating-point math at 26150, and multithread at 11685 all indicate robust throughput.

Single-core performance also favors the Core 5 211TE. Cinebench R23 single-core at 1722, R20 single-core at 723, and R15 single-core at 173 demonstrate strong per-thread capability for responsiveness in everyday applications. The PassMark single-thread score of 1408 and extended instructions score of 8615 reinforce this conclusion.

The Intel Processor U303L's advantages lie in its mobile-oriented characteristics rather than benchmark performance. Its 15-watt TDP makes it suitable for thermally constrained environments. Its PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes provides adequate connectivity for typical mobile workloads. Its 5-core, 6-thread configuration with lower clock speeds consumes less power, which benefits battery-operated devices.

The Core 5 211TE's desktop segment designation and 45-watt TDP indicate it belongs in systems with adequate cooling and power delivery. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes enables high-bandwidth expansion options. ECC memory support makes it appropriate for data-integrity-sensitive applications.

The U303L's mobile segment designation and lack of ECC support position it for consumer mobile devices where power efficiency and thermal management take precedence over raw compute capability. Its integrated UHD Graphics 96EU provides visual output for typical mobile use cases.

The recorded data offers no benchmark results for the U303L, which means the Core 5 211TE wins all available comparative metrics by default. The structural differences in cores, threads, clocks, cache, and PCIe capabilities all favor the Core 5 211TE for performance-oriented workloads, while the U303L's design parameters suggest its strengths lie in power efficiency and mobile deployment scenarios.