Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 211TE compare to the Intel Processor U302L in core count?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. This gives the Core 5 a substantial advantage in raw parallel processing capability.

Q: What are the boost clock differences between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Processor U302L boosts to 2.40 GHz. The Core 5 211TE has double the maximum frequency of the U302L.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel buses. However, the Core 5 211TE has a listed memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the U302L's memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

Q: What is the TDP difference between these two chips?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel Processor U302L has a TDP of 15 watts. The U302L is designed for lower power operation, typical of mobile segments.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, whereas the Intel Processor U302L is at the 50th percentile. The Core 5 211TE also has an average benchmark score of 15370, while the U302L has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. Both the Intel Core 5 211TE and the Intel Processor U302L have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports user overclocking.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 211TE belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation and uses the codename "Bartlett Lake." The Intel Processor U302L is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename "Raptor Lake-PS." Both are manufactured on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry, but they target different market segments: the Core 5 211TE is a desktop part, and the U302L is a mobile processor.

The Core 5 211TE packs 10 cores with 16 threads, a configuration that emphasizes multi-threaded throughput. The U302L has only 5 cores and 6 threads, a more modest setup suited to lower-power environments. Both share the same L1 cache structure at 80 KB per core and the same L2 cache at 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache differs significantly: the Core 5 211TE has 20 MB shared, while the U302L has 10 MB shared. This larger shared cache on the Core 5 211TE can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data across more cores.

The integrated graphics also differ. The Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the U302L uses UHD Graphics 80EU. The database does not provide performance numbers for either iGPU, but the model numbers indicate different configurations.

PCIe support varies as well. The Core 5 211TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the U302L supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. This gives the desktop part double the lane count and a newer generation for higher bandwidth peripherals. ECC memory support is present on the Core 5 211TE but absent on the U302L, which may matter for workstation reliability scenarios.

The release dates differ by roughly 9 months. The U302L launched on 2024-04-07, while the Core 5 211TE launched on 2025-01-12. Both are active in production, but the Core 5 211TE carries a part number of SRQDL, while the U302L has part number SRPKGQ5CX.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for these two processors. The Intel Processor U302L has an empty benchmark list, meaning no Cinebench, PassMark, or other test scores are recorded for it. The Intel Core 5 211TE, by contrast, has a full set of 17 benchmark scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple PassMark tests.

Without direct comparison data, the analysis must rely on the Core 5 211TE's absolute scores and its percentile ranking. The Core 5 211TE achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12201 and a single-core score of 1722. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5124 multi-core and 723 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 1229 multi-core and 173 single-core.

PassMark results for the Core 5 211TE include a multithread score of 11685 and a single-thread score of 1408. Specific workload tests show data compression at 133434, data encryption at 7231, extended instructions at 8615, find prime numbers at 72, floating point math at 26150, integer math at 33991, physics at 1278, and random string sorting at 14838.

The nearest rivals for the Core 5 211TE provide context. Its average benchmark score of 15370 sits 0.7% below the AMD EPYC 7543 (which scores 15477) and 2% below the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U (which scores 15682). It sits 1.6% above the AMD EPYC 7702P (which scores 15130) and 2.3% above the Intel Core i3-1315U (which scores 15022). These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the Core 5 211TE performs in line with these server and mobile parts in aggregate benchmarks.

The U302L has no rival data and no average score, so its performance cannot be positioned against the Core 5 211TE or any other processor from the recorded measurements.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. Core count stands at 10 for the Core 5 211TE versus 5 for the U302L. Thread count is 16 versus 6. Base clock rates are 1.70 GHz for the Core 5 211TE and 1.20 GHz for the U302L. Boost clock rates are 4.80 GHz versus 2.40 GHz.

TDP values are 45 watts for the Core 5 211TE and 15 watts for the U302L. The socket is the same Intel Socket 1700 for both, but the market segments differ: desktop for the Core 5 211TE and mobile for the U302L.

The L3 cache is 20 MB shared on the Core 5 211TE and 10 MB shared on the U302L. Memory bandwidth is listed at 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 211TE, while the U302L has no listed value. ECC memory support is enabled on the Core 5 211TE but not on the U302L.

PCIe capabilities differ: the Core 5 211TE uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the U302L uses Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics models are UHD Graphics 730 for the Core 5 211TE and UHD Graphics 80EU for the U302L.

The die size is 215 mm² for the Core 5 211TE, while the U302L has no recorded die size. Release dates are 2025-01-12 for the Core 5 211TE and 2024-04-07 for the U302L. Launch MSRP values are $221 for the Core 5 211TE and $285 for the U302L. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211TE wins on every metric that the database records. It has more cores, more threads, higher base and boost clocks, double the L3 cache, faster PCIe generation with more lanes, ECC support, and a full set of benchmark scores that place it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are server-class AMD EPYC parts and newer Ryzen mobile chips, and it trades within a few percentage points of each. The Core 5 211TE is positioned for multi-threaded desktop workloads, data compression, encryption, and floating-point math, based on its PassMark sub-scores.

The Intel Processor U302L wins on power efficiency. Its 15 watt TDP is one-third of the Core 5 211TE's 45 watt TDP. It also has a lower base clock of 1.20 GHz, which typically reduces power draw. The U302L targets the mobile segment, so it is designed for systems where thermal and power constraints are stricter. Its 50th percentile ranking, while lower than the Core 5 211TE's 69th percentile, still indicates average performance relative to all CPUs in the database.

The U302L's integrated graphics model, UHD Graphics 80EU, and its PCIe Gen 4 support with 8 lanes are sufficient for lighter mobile tasks. The Core 5 211TE's PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes and larger cache make it better suited for desktop builds with discrete GPUs or NVMe storage that can use the additional bandwidth.

The launch MSRP of $221 for the Core 5 211TE and $285 for the U302L does not correlate with the performance data: the lower-priced part has significantly higher benchmark scores and a higher percentile ranking.

The Verdict

The recorded data strongly favors the Intel Core 5 211TE for performance-oriented users. It delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12201 and a single-core score of 1722, placing it in the 69th percentile. Its nearest rivals in the database are all within 2.3% of its average score, which shows it competes with server and upper-midrange mobile parts. The Core 5 211TE has double the cores and more than double the boost clock of the U302L, plus twice the L3 cache and a newer PCIe implementation.

The Intel Processor U302L is the appropriate choice for power-constrained mobile systems. Its 15 watt TDP and lower clocks reduce heat and energy demands. However, the database records no benchmark scores for it, so its actual performance cannot be verified against the Core 5 211TE or any other CPU. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests average performance, but without test scores, that ranking carries limited analytical weight.

For any workload that benefits from multi-threading, the Core 5 211TE is the clear pick from the available data. For a system that prioritizes low power consumption and mobile form factors, the U302L fits that profile, but its performance characteristics remain undocumented. The Core 5 211TE also offers ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5, which are absent from the U302L. The U302L's higher launch MSRP of $285, compared to $221 for the Core 5 211TE, further complicates its positioning, as the lower-priced part demonstrates superior benchmark results across the board.