Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the Intel Core 5 211TE and the Intel Processor N150 across all four shared benchmark tests. The Core 5 211TE wins every head-to-head comparison, with the largest margin appearing in multi-core workloads.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 5 211TE scores 12,201 points against the N150's 2,590.5 points, a delta of 371%. This is the single largest proportional difference in the dataset. The multi-core advantage stems directly from the Core 5 211TE's 10 cores and 16 threads, compared to the N150's 4 cores and 4 threads.

The single-core results tell a more moderate story. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 5 211TE scores 1,722 points versus 935 points for the N150, a delta of 84.2%. The Core 5 211TE's boost clock of 4.80 GHz contributes to this advantage, while the N150's boost clock reaches only 3.60 GHz.

Cinebench R15 results follow the same pattern. The Core 5 211TE scores 1,229 points in R15 multi-core, while the N150 manages 422.5 points, a delta of 190.9%. In R15 single-core, the Core 5 211TE scores 173 points against 153.15 points, a delta of 13%, which is the narrowest margin recorded in the head-to-head set.

The benchmark data also places both processors in different performance percentiles. The Core 5 211TE sits at the 69th percentile of all CPUs, while the N150 sits at the 28th percentile. The average benchmark score for the Core 5 211TE is 15,370, compared to 1,025 for the N150. The nearest rival data confirms the positioning: the Core 5 211TE trades within 2.3% of the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U and 2.0% of the AMD EPYC 7543, while the N150 sits within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-5650U and 0.1% of the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 211TE wins every recorded benchmark category, but the size of the win varies by workload type. Multi-threaded rendering tasks show the strongest advantage. The 371% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core indicates a processor designed for sustained parallel workloads, such as video encoding, 3D scene rendering, or software compilation. The 190.9% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core reinforces this pattern.

The Core 5 211TE also leads in single-threaded performance, though by a smaller margin. The 84.2% advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core and the 13% advantage in Cinebench R15 single-core show that the Core 5 211TE delivers faster per-core execution. This matters for applications that rely heavily on one or two threads, such as older games or lightly threaded productivity tools.

The N150, despite losing every head-to-head test, still holds a meaningful position in the low-power mobile segment. Its 6 W TDP and single-channel memory configuration point to a design focused on energy efficiency rather than raw throughput. The N150's nearest rivals include processors like the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and the Intel Core i3-4340, which places it in a fundamentally different performance class than the Core 5 211TE.

The data shows no benchmark category where the N150 outperforms the Core 5 211TE. However, the N150's 4-core design with a 0.10 GHz base clock and 3.60 GHz boost clock is suited for basic tasks like web browsing, document editing, and media playback, where the Core 5 211TE's additional cores and higher power draw would be unnecessary.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Intel Core 5 211TE in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 5 211TE scores 12,201 points compared to the N150's 2,590.5 points, a delta of 371%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Core 5 211TE scores 1,229 points versus 422.5 points, a delta of 190.9%.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference?

A: The Core 5 211TE scores 1,722 points in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 935 points for the N150, a delta of 84.2%. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Core 5 211TE scores 173 points against 153.15 points, a delta of 13%.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads. The N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: How do their benchmark percentiles compare?

A: The Core 5 211TE is at the 69th percentile of all CPUs, while the N150 is at the 28th percentile. The average benchmark score is 15,370 for the Core 5 211TE and 1,025 for the N150.

Q: What are the closest rivals for each processor?

A: The Core 5 211TE's nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7702P with an average score of 15,130, a delta of 1.6%. The N150's nearest rival is the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T with an average score of 1,024, a delta of 0.1%.

Q: Do both processors use the same integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 211TE and the N150 feature UHD Graphics 730.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The base clock of the Core 5 211TE is 1.70 GHz, while the N150's base clock is 0.10 GHz. The boost clock of the Core 5 211TE is 4.80 GHz, while the N150 reaches 3.60 GHz.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The Core 5 211TE carries a 45 W TDP, while the N150 is rated at 6 W. The Core 5 211TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the N150 uses Intel BGA 1264. The Core 5 211TE supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the N150 supports single-channel memory with a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Core 5 211TE supports ECC memory, while the N150 does not.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The Core 5 211TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the N150 provides Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only). Memory support varies as well: the Core 5 211TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the N150 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5.

The market segments differ. The Core 5 211TE is classified as a Desktop processor, while the N150 is classified as Mobile. The release dates differ too: the Core 5 211TE was released on 2025-01-12, while the N150 was released on 2024-11-19. The Core 5 211TE has a launch MSRP of $221, while the N150 has no recorded launch MSRP. The Core 5 211TE has a die size of 215 mm², while the N150's die size is not recorded.

Architecture Differences

The architecture details reveal distinct design philosophies. The Core 5 211TE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The N150 is based on the Twin Lake architecture and belongs to the Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N) generation. Both use a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The Core 5 211TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The N150 has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 211TE's L3 cache is more than three times larger than the N150's, which supports its higher multi-core throughput.

The Core 5 211TE's 10-core, 16-thread configuration with a 4.80 GHz boost clock and 45 W TDP indicates a performance-oriented desktop design. The N150's 4-core, 4-thread configuration with a 0.10 GHz base clock and 6 W TDP indicates an efficiency-focused mobile design. The N150's 0.10 GHz base clock is unusually low, suggesting aggressive power-saving behavior at idle.

Both processors share the UHD Graphics 730 integrated GPU, but the surrounding platform differs. The Core 5 211TE pairs with Gen 5 PCIe and dual-channel memory, while the N150 pairs with Gen 3 PCIe and single-channel memory. The N150's support for LPDDR5 memory aligns with its mobile positioning. The Core 5 211TE's ECC memory support and larger memory bandwidth target desktop workloads where data integrity and throughput matter.

The architecture difference also shows in the production status: both are Active. The part numbers differ as well: SRQDL for the Core 5 211TE and SRPNR for the N150. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The recorded data directs a clear choice based on workload requirements. The Core 5 211TE delivers 371% higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23 and 190.9% higher in Cinebench R15, making it the appropriate selection for rendering, compilation, or any parallel processing workload. Its 69th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 15,370 place it firmly in the mid-range desktop class, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 7702P and the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U.

The N150, with its 6 W TDP, 4 cores, and single-channel memory, serves a different purpose. Its 28th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 1,025 align it with older or low-power processors like the Intel Core i3-4340 and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. The data does not support using the N150 for demanding multi-threaded tasks. It is better matched to lightweight mobile applications where power efficiency takes priority over performance.

For users who need maximum throughput on a desktop platform, the Core 5 211TE is the only choice supported by the benchmark results. For users who prioritize low power consumption and minimal thermal output in a mobile form factor, the N150's 6 W TDP and LPDDR5 support make it a viable option, despite its significant performance deficit. The 13% single-core delta in Cinebench R15 shows the narrowest gap between the two, but even that margin favors the Core 5 211TE. The data provides no scenario where the N150 outperforms the Core 5 211TE in any recorded metric.