Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the Intel Core 5 211TE and the Intel Processor 300T. The Core 5 211TE delivers an average benchmark score of 15370, while the Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, resulting in an average score of 0. This absence of measurable data for the Processor 300T means every direct comparison must rely on the architectural and specification differences recorded for both parts.

The Core 5 211TE sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, placing it above the median processor in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7543 with an average score of 15477 and a delta of -0.7%, the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U with an average score of 15682 and a delta of -2%, the AMD EPYC 7702P with an average score of 15130 and a delta of 1.6%, and the Intel Core i3-1315U with an average score of 15022 and a delta of 2.3%. These figures indicate the Core 5 211TE performs within a tight band around these established processors, trailing the Ryzen 3 7440U by 2% and the EPYC 7543 by 0.7%, while leading the EPYC 7702P by 1.6% and the Core i3-1315U by 2.3%.

In single-core workloads, the Core 5 211TE records a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1722, a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 723, and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 173. PassMark single-thread results show a score of 1408. Multi-core results are substantially higher: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 12201, Cinebench R20 multi-core reaches 5124, and Cinebench R15 multi-core reaches 1229. The PassMark multithread score is 11685.

PassMark specialty workloads further characterize the Core 5 211TE. Data compression scores 133434, data encryption scores 7231, extended instructions score 8615, find prime numbers scores 72, floating point math scores 26150, integer math scores 33991, physics scores 1278, and random string sorting scores 14838.

The Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark entries, so no direct head-to-head scores exist. The database therefore shows the Core 5 211TE as the only part with measurable performance data, and its percentile placement confirms it operates above the median CPU population. The delta values against its nearest rivals show a balanced position: two rivals score slightly higher, two score slightly lower, with all deltas within a narrow 4.3 percentage point spread.

The Verdict

The data indicates the Intel Core 5 211TE is the processor with demonstrated performance, while the Intel Processor 300T lacks any recorded benchmark results. For workloads requiring multi-threaded throughput, the Core 5 211TE offers 10 cores and 16 threads, a combination that produces a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12201. The Processor 300T provides only 2 cores and 4 threads, with no scores to verify its output.

Users who need single-thread responsiveness will find the Core 5 211TE's boost clock of 4.80 GHz and its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1722 as the only recorded data points available. The Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no boost clock listed, so its peak frequency remains unconfirmed in the database.

The Processor 300T holds advantages in power draw and launch price. Its TDP is 35 watts versus 45 watts for the Core 5 211TE, and its launch MSRP is $82. The Core 5 211TE has a launch MSRP of $221. Both processors use the Intel Socket 1700, so platform compatibility is identical.

The Core 5 211TE also includes ECC memory support, a feature absent from the Processor 300T. The integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has an average benchmark score of 15370, while the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores and an average of 0.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds for both processors?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no boost clock recorded.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel operation. The Core 5 211TE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Processor 300T has no memory bandwidth figure recorded.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T does not.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: What integrated graphics do they use?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The Intel Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core 5 211TE and Intel Processor 300T share several platform-level specifications but differ across core counts, cache sizes, and power characteristics.

The Core 5 211TE uses a die size of 215 mm², while the Processor 300T uses a die size of 163 mm². Both processors are built on a 10 nm process node by Intel.

Cache configurations differ significantly. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache, however, is 20 MB shared on the Core 5 211TE versus 6 MB shared on the Processor 300T.

Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the Core 5 211TE at 76.8 GB/s. The Processor 300T has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

PCIe support is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) for both.

ECC memory support is present on the Core 5 211TE and absent on the Processor 300T.

The integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 211TE, UHD Graphics 710 on the Processor 300T.

Release dates differ by roughly one year. The Core 5 211TE was released on 2025-01-12, while the Processor 300T was released on 2024-01-07.

The part numbers are SRQDL for the Core 5 211TE and SRN3K for the Processor 300T.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 211TE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The Intel Processor 300T is based on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename and belongs to the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation.

The core and thread counts reflect the architectural gap: 10 cores and 16 threads on the Core 5 211TE versus 2 cores and 4 threads on the Processor 300T. The base clocks also differ, with the Core 5 211TE running at 1.70 GHz and the Processor 300T at 3.40 GHz. The Core 5 211TE is the only one with a boost clock, listed at 4.80 GHz.

Both processors use a 10 nm process node from Intel. The die sizes differ, with the Core 5 211TE at 215 mm² and the Processor 300T at 163 mm².

The L3 cache allocation shows the larger design of the Core 5 211TE: 20 MB shared versus 6 MB shared. L1 and L2 cache per core are identical at 80 KB and 1.25 MB respectively.

ECC memory support appears only on the Core 5 211TE. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, but the memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is recorded only for the Core 5 211TE.

The market segment for both is Desktop, and both are currently Active in production status. Both use the Intel Socket 1700.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211TE wins in multi-threaded performance based on the recorded data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12201, Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5124, and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1229 demonstrate substantial throughput capacity. The PassMark multithread score of 11685 and integer math score of 33991 reinforce this position.

The Core 5 211TE also wins in single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1722 and a PassMark single-thread score of 1408. Its boost clock of 4.80 GHz provides the peak frequency advantage.

Specialized workloads favor the Core 5 211TE by default, as it is the only processor with recorded scores. Data compression reaches 133434, data encryption reaches 7231, extended instructions reach 8615, floating point math reaches 26150, physics reaches 1278, and random string sorting reaches 14838.

The Intel Processor 300T wins in power efficiency, with a TDP of 35 watts versus 45 watts for the Core 5 211TE. It also has a lower launch MSRP of $82 versus $221 for the Core 5 211TE, though price comparisons are limited to stating the launch MSRP values.

The Processor 300T has a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz, which may benefit workloads that rely on sustained base frequency rather than boost behavior. However, no benchmark data exists to confirm this advantage.

For users who require ECC memory support, the Core 5 211TE is the only option between the two. The Processor 300T lacks this feature entirely.

For systems needing lower power draw and a smaller die footprint, the Processor 300T presents the more compact design at 163 mm². The Core 5 211TE uses a larger 215 mm² die.

The integrated graphics choice depends on the model: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 211TE versus UHD Graphics 710 on the Processor 300T.

The Processor 300T occupies the 50th percentile among all CPUs, while the Core 5 211TE sits at the 69th percentile, indicating the Core 5 211TE ranks higher in the overall performance distribution.

Both processors share the same socket, PCIe configuration, memory type support, and production status, so platform-level decisions do not differentiate them. The choice rests on core count, cache size, ECC support, graphics tier, and the presence of recorded benchmark results.