Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245K Comparison

Intel Core 5 211TE and Intel Core Ultra 5 245K occupy very different positions in the desktop processor landscape. The recorded benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy, with the Core Ultra 5 245K dominating every single test in the comparison set. This analysis breaks down the architectural foundations, benchmark results, and practical implications of these two Intel desktop parts.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head benchmark results are unambiguous: the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K wins all 17 recorded comparisons. The Intel Core 5 211TE does not secure a single victory in any test. This is not a close contest with split decision wins; it is a comprehensive sweep by the newer, higher-end part.

The Core 5 211TE still holds relevance in specific contexts based on its platform characteristics. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This flexibility allows builders to use existing DDR4 memory kits, potentially lowering platform costs. The Core Ultra 5 245K requires DDR5 exclusively, offering no backward compatibility with older memory technology.

The Core 5 211TE also delivers a 45W TDP rating, which positions it as a lower-power desktop option. The Core Ultra 5 245K carries a 125W TDP rating. For systems where thermal output and power delivery are constrained, the Core 5 211TE presents a more manageable profile.

The integrated graphics differ between the two. The Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 245K features Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. Systems relying on integrated graphics for basic display output or light media tasks will see different capabilities, with the Arc-based solution representing a more modern graphics architecture.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design generations. The Intel Core 5 211TE is built on the Bartlett Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. The Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, manufactured by TSMC on a 3 nm process node. This process node difference is substantial, with the 3 nm node representing a significant advancement in transistor density and power efficiency potential.

The core and thread configurations tell an interesting story. The Core 5 211TE offers 10 cores and 16 threads, indicating a hybrid arrangement with performance and efficiency cores. The Core Ultra 5 245K provides 14 cores but only 14 threads, meaning its cores do not support simultaneous multithreading. Despite having fewer threads, the Core Ultra 5 245K massively outperforms the Core 5 211TE in every multithreaded benchmark.

Cache hierarchies differ across all levels. The Core 5 211TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 245K has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core caches on the Core Ultra 5 245K contribute to its superior single-thread performance.

Memory bandwidth ratings show a major gap. The Core 5 211TE is rated at 76.8 GB/s, while the Core Ultra 5 245K reaches 102.4 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the newer part's higher bandwidth supports more demanding workloads.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The Core 5 211TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Core Ultra 5 245K offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The additional four lanes on the newer processor enable more expansion options or additional storage devices.

Clock speeds show the Core Ultra 5 245K at a higher operating range. Its base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Core 5 211TE runs at 1.70 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. The higher base clock of the Core Ultra 5 245K indicates a much higher sustained performance floor.

The Core Ultra 5 245K has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 5 211TE is locked. This makes the Core Ultra 5 245K the only one of the two that supports manual overclocking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results establish the overall performance gap. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core Ultra 5 245K scores 3850 against 1229 for the Core 5 211TE, a 68.1% advantage. Single-core in R15 shows 322 versus 173, a 46.3% lead. The R20 multicore test shows 15368 versus 5124, a 66.7% difference. R20 single-core repeats the exact 66.7% delta with scores of 2169 and 723.

Cinebench R23 results narrow the gap somewhat in single-core. The Core Ultra 5 245K scores 2132 against 1722, a 19.2% lead. Multicore R23 shows 25066 versus 12201, a 51.3% advantage. The smaller single-core delta in R23 suggests that the Core 5 211TE's boost clock of 4.80 GHz helps it remain more competitive in lightly threaded workloads compared to heavily multithreaded ones.

PassMark results reveal even larger gaps in specific workload types. The data encryption test shows the Core Ultra 5 245K at 33286 versus 7231, a 78.3% lead. Extended instructions show 37617 versus 8615, a 77.1% difference. The find prime numbers test shows 414 versus 72, the largest gap at 82.6%. Floating point math shows 130678 versus 26150, an 80% difference.

The data compression test shows 458817 versus 133434, a 70.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245K. Integer math shows 98524 versus 33991, a 65.5% difference. The multithread PassMark test shows 43047 versus 11685, a 72.9% gap. Physics shows 3081 versus 1278, a 58.5% difference. Random string sorting shows 55098 versus 14838, a 73.1% gap.

The single-thread PassMark test shows 4714 versus 1408, a 70.1% difference. This result is notable because it shows the Core Ultra 5 245K's single-thread advantage is much larger in PassMark than in Cinebench R23. Different benchmark methodologies capture different aspects of processor performance.

The average benchmark scores reflect the overall separation. The Core 5 211TE averages 15370 across its benchmark suite, placing it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs. The Core Ultra 5 245K averages 54053, placing it in the 91st percentile. The Core Ultra 5 245K's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P with a 0.7% higher score, Intel Core i7-14700F at 0.8% lower, and AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D at 1.3% lower. The Core 5 211TE sits near AMD EPYC 7543, AMD EPYC 7702P, AMD Ryzen 3 7440U, and Intel Core i3-1315U.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K has 14 cores, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores. The Core Ultra 5 245K has 14 threads, while the Core 5 211TE has 16 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245K scores 25066, which is 51.3% ahead of the Core 5 211TE's score of 12201.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 211TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K support ECC memory in the recorded specifications.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 5 211TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Core Ultra 5 245K supports DDR5 only.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245K boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 245K also has a higher base clock at 4.20 GHz versus 1.70 GHz.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 245K uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The Arc-based solution is a newer graphics architecture.

The Verdict

The benchmark data supports a straightforward conclusion. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K outperforms the Intel Core 5 211TE in every recorded test, with deltas ranging from 19.2% in Cinebench R23 single-core to 82.6% in PassMark find prime numbers. The average benchmark scores place the Core Ultra 5 245K in the 91st percentile versus the 69th percentile for the Core 5 211TE.

The Core 5 211TE's advantages are platform-level rather than performance-level. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and has a 45W TDP. These characteristics suit systems where memory flexibility or lower power draw is prioritized.

The Core Ultra 5 245K targets users who need maximum performance. It uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, requires DDR5, has a 125W TDP, and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Its 3 nm process node, larger caches, and higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s support its performance leadership.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 211TE | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 14 |

| Base clock | 1.70 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 125 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Arrow Lake-S |

| Process node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 17,800 million |

| Die size | 215 mm² | 243 mm² |

| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | Yes |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $319 |

| Release date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-10-23 |