Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a complete benchmark set for the Intel Core 5 211TE, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has no recorded benchmark scores. This means a direct head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the Core 5 211TE's measured performance and the architectural specifications of both processors.

The Core 5 211TE achieves an average benchmark score of 15370, placing it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7543 (15477 average score, 0.7% higher), the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U (15682 average score, 2% higher), the AMD EPYC 7702P (15130 average score, 1.6% lower), and the Intel Core i3-1315U (15022 average score, 2.3% lower). The Core 5 211TE sits within a narrow band of these rivals, trailing the Ryzen 3 7440U by 2% and the EPYC 7543 by 0.7%, while leading the EPYC 7702P by 1.6% and the i3-1315U by 2.3%.

In Cinebench testing, the Core 5 211TE scores 1229 in R15 multi-core and 173 in R15 single-core. The R20 results show 5124 multi-core and 723 single-core. R23 testing produces 12201 multi-core and 1722 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that handles both heavily threaded workloads and single-threaded tasks with consistent strength, given its 10 cores and 16 threads.

PassMark results for the Core 5 211TE cover a range of specialized workloads. Multi-thread performance scores 11685, while single-thread performance scores 1408. Integer math reaches 33991, floating-point math reaches 26150, and extended instructions score 8615. Data compression scores 133434, data encryption scores 7231, and random string sorting scores 14838. Physics processing scores 1278, and find prime numbers scores 72. The strongest relative results appear in integer math, floating-point math, and data compression, reflecting a processor that allocates its resources effectively across varied computational tasks.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry, with a die size of 215 mm². The Core Ultra 5 135HL uses Meteor Lake architecture, specifically the Meteor Lake-PS codename, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1 generation. It is built on a 7 nm process node, also at Intel's foundry, but its die size is not recorded in the database.

Core counts differ substantially. The Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL has 14 cores and 18 threads. Both processors have a base clock of 1.70 GHz, but the Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the Core Ultra 5 135HL's boost of 4.60 GHz. Both are locked processors with multipliers that cannot be unlocked.

Cache hierarchies diverge in capacity and distribution. The Core 5 211TE has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 135HL has 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 135HL therefore holds more private cache per core, while the Core 5 211TE has more total shared L3.

Memory support differs as well. The Core 5 211TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL supports DDR5 with capacity dependent on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the Core Ultra 5 135HL has a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s compared to 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 211TE. ECC memory is supported by the Core 5 211TE but not by the Core Ultra 5 135HL.

PCIe capabilities are also distinct. The Core 5 211TE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU-only lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL uses Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. Socket requirements diverge, with the Core 5 211TE using Intel Socket 1700 and the Core Ultra 5 135HL using Intel Socket 1851.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 211TE wins in raw measured performance because it has benchmark data and the Core Ultra 5 135HL does not. The Core 5 211TE's multi-thread scores, such as 12201 in R23 multi-core and 11685 in PassMark multi-thread, establish a baseline of proven capability that the Core Ultra 5 135HL cannot currently match according to the database.

The Core 5 211TE also wins on boost clock, reaching 4.80 GHz versus the Core Ultra 5 135HL's 4.60 GHz. For single-threaded tasks, the database shows a PassMark single-thread score of 1408 and an R23 single-core score of 1722 for the Core 5 211TE. Higher boost clocks typically translate to stronger single-thread performance, but the Core Ultra 5 135HL's lower recorded boost means the Core 5 211TE holds the advantage in this area per the specifications.

The Core Ultra 5 135HL wins on core count, offering 14 cores versus 10, and thread count, offering 18 threads versus 16. More cores and threads generally support better parallel workload scaling, though the Core Ultra 5 135HL's lack of benchmark data prevents verification of that advantage. The Core Ultra 5 135HL also wins on memory bandwidth, providing 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, which can benefit memory-intensive applications.

The Core Ultra 5 135HL has larger per-core caches, with 112 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core versus 80 KB and 1.25 MB for the Core 5 211TE. The Core Ultra 5 135HL also uses a smaller 7 nm process node versus 10 nm, which can improve power efficiency, though neither power consumption nor efficiency is directly measured in the database. The Core Ultra 5 135HL integrates Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics, a more advanced integrated GPU than the UHD Graphics 730 found in the Core 5 211TE.

The Core 5 211TE wins in cache capacity at the L3 level, with 20 MB shared versus 18 MB shared for the Core Ultra 5 135HL. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility that the Core Ultra 5 135HL does not provide, since that processor supports DDR5 only. ECC memory support in the Core 5 211TE gives it an advantage for reliability-sensitive computing environments.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 211TE is the only processor in this comparison with measured benchmark results. Its average score of 15370 and 69th percentile ranking demonstrate that it performs competitively against processors like the AMD EPYC 7543, AMD EPYC 7702P, AMD Ryzen 3 7440U, and Intel Core i3-1315U. Users seeking a processor with proven, quantified performance should select the Core 5 211TE based on the available data.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL offers architectural advantages that the Core 5 211TE lacks: 14 cores versus 10, 18 threads versus 16, higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, a smaller 7 nm process node, and a more capable integrated GPU with Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. These specifications suggest potential strength in multi-threaded workloads and graphics-related tasks, but the absence of benchmark scores in the database means that potential remains unverified.

The Core 5 211TE offers the higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz, which supports strong single-thread performance as indicated by its R23 single-core score of 1722 and PassMark single-thread score of 1408. It also provides ECC memory support, DDR4 compatibility, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and a larger 20 MB L3 cache. These features make it suitable for users who prioritize measured performance, memory flexibility, and platform compatibility.

The Core Ultra 5 135HL targets a different use case with its higher core count, larger per-core caches, and newer process node. Its support for PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes and DDR5-only memory reflects a more modern platform, but the smaller lane count may limit expansion options compared to the Core 5 211TE's 16 Gen 5 lanes. The Core Ultra 5 135HL also lacks ECC memory support, which the Core 5 211TE includes.

Based strictly on the database, the Core 5 211TE is the stronger choice because it has measurable performance data and a higher percentile ranking of 69 versus 50 for the Core Ultra 5 135HL. The Core 5 211TE's launch MSRP is $221. The Core Ultra 5 135HL has no recorded launch MSRP, no benchmark scores, and no nearest rivals, leaving it as a specification-only option whose real-world performance cannot be assessed.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has 14 cores, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has measured benchmark scores?

A: Only the Intel Core 5 211TE has benchmark scores in the database. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has no recorded benchmarks.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE provides 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL provides 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 20 MB shared L3, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has 18 MB shared L3.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 211TE | Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL |

|----------------|-------------------|---------------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 18 |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Meteor Lake-PS |

| Architecture | Not specified | Meteor Lake |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, depends on motherboard |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc Xe-LPG 128EU |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-04-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SRQDL | SRN33 |