Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a decisive sweep: the Intel Core i7-14650HX wins all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the Intel Core 5 211TE. The margins are substantial across nearly every workload category, though the gap narrows in certain single-threaded tests.

In Cinebench multi-core workloads, the i7-14650HX demonstrates its dominant position. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-14650HX scores 3470.5 against the 211TE's 1229, a 64.6% advantage. The R20 multi-core test shows a 57.1% lead (11946 versus 5124), while R23 multi-core reveals a 40.3% gap (20454 versus 12201). These results indicate that the i7-14650HX delivers roughly two-thirds more throughput in the older R15 test and about two-fifths more in the newer R23 workload.

Single-core performance tells a different story. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the i7-14650HX scores 285.5 versus 173 for the 211TE, a 39.4% lead. The R20 single-core test shows a 57.1% gap (1686 versus 723), while R23 single-core narrows to just 12.5% (1969 versus 1722). This pattern suggests that while the i7-14650HX holds a clear single-thread advantage, the 211TE's architecture closes some of that distance in the more modern R23 workload. The PassMark single-thread score, however, tells a contrasting story: 3841 for the i7-14650HX versus 1408 for the 211TE, a 63.3% difference that indicates a much larger single-thread performance disparity than the R23 result implies.

The PassMark suite highlights where the i7-14650HX truly separates itself. Integer math shows a 70.9% lead (116661 versus 33991), floating-point math a 69.2% advantage (84999 versus 26150), and data compression a 66.5% gap (398418 versus 133434). Data encryption produces the largest relative difference at 68.4% (22917 versus 7231). Extended instructions follow at 64.3% (24150 versus 8615), while random string sorting shows a 65.5% gap (43035 versus 14838). Prime number finding, a test that often scales with core count, shows a 52.6% advantage (152 versus 72). The PassMark multi-thread score reflects this overall disparity: 33495 versus 11685, a 65.1% lead.

The smallest margins appear in physics simulation and single-threaded Cinebench tests. Physics shows a 42% gap (2202 versus 1278), while R23 single-core's 12.5% difference represents the closest result in the entire comparison. Even so, the i7-14650HX wins every single recorded test, with no benchmark favoring the 211TE.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel lineages with distinct design priorities. The Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, part of the Core 5 generation, while the Core i7-14650HX belongs to the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh family within the Core 14th Gen series. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry, but the silicon differs in size: the 211TE measures 215 mm², while the i7-14650HX occupies 257 mm².

Core and thread counts establish the fundamental scaling difference. The 211TE offers 10 cores and 16 threads, while the i7-14650HX provides 16 cores and 24 threads. That extra silicon area translates directly into additional processing resources. Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both processors share an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: 1.25 MB per core on the 211TE versus 2 MB per core on the i7-14650HX. The shared L3 cache doubles from 20 MB on the 211TE to 30 MB on the i7-14650HX, providing the larger chip with significantly more on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Clock speeds favor the i7-14650HX as well. The 211TE has a 1.70 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock, while the i7-14650HX starts at 2.20 GHz and boosts to 5.20 GHz. Thermal design power also differs, with the 211TE rated at 45 watts and the i7-14650HX at 55 watts, reflecting the higher core count and clock speeds.

Memory support remains identical on both: DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. The 211TE records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i7-14650HX entry does not list a bandwidth figure. Both processors support ECC memory and offer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ slightly: the 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i7-14650HX carries UHD Graphics 710.

Physical packaging separates the two clearly. The 211TE uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop market, while the i7-14650HX uses Intel BGA 1964 and is designed for mobile systems. The i7-14650HX also features an unlocked multiplier, whereas the 211TE is locked. Release dates show the i7-14650HX arriving on 2024-01-07, with the 211TE following on 2025-01-12. The 211TE lists a launch MSRP of $221, while the i7-14650HX has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How much larger is the L3 cache on the i7-14650HX?

A: The i7-14650HX has 30 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 20 MB on the 211TE, a 50% increase in on-die cache capacity.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The i7-14650HX boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the 211TE reaches 4.80 GHz, a 0.40 GHz advantage for the i7-14650HX.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 211TE and the Intel Core i7-14650HX support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor is designed for desktop use?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700, while the Intel Core i7-14650HX is a mobile processor using Intel BGA 1964.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i7-14650HX uses UHD Graphics 710. The recorded data does not include graphics benchmark scores for either processor.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 211TE | Intel Core i7-14650HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 16 |

| Threads | 16 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 1.70 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 55 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not listed |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not listed |

| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |

| Part Number | SRQDL | SRMXH |

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data shows the Intel Core i7-14650HX winning every recorded test, which makes the use-case split straightforward. The i7-14650HX dominates in multi-threaded productivity workloads, as evidenced by its 65.1% lead in PassMark multi-thread scoring and its 40.3% advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core. For workloads involving data compression, encryption, or extended instruction sets, the i7-14650HX's 16 cores and 24 threads provide between 64.3% and 68.4% more throughput than the 211TE.

The i7-14650HX also leads in single-threaded performance across all recorded tests. The PassMark single-thread score of 3841 versus 1408 indicates a 63.3% advantage, which suggests that even for lightly threaded applications, the i7-14650HX delivers substantially better responsiveness. Its higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz contributes to this result.

The Intel Core 5 211TE does not win any benchmark category in the recorded data. However, its lower TDP of 45 watts versus 55 watts, smaller die size of 215 mm² versus 257 mm², and desktop socket design (Intel Socket 1700) position it differently in the market. The 211TE also carries a launch MSRP of $221, while the i7-14650HX has no recorded price. For systems where the desktop form factor is required, the 211TE remains the only option between the two, as the i7-14650HX is a mobile BGA part.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear hierarchy: the Intel Core i7-14650HX outperforms the Intel Core 5 211TE in every single benchmark recorded. The 17-0 win tally, combined with the average benchmark score of 41576 for the i7-14650HX versus 15370 for the 211TE, places the i7-14650HX in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the 211TE sits at the 69th percentile. The i7-14650HX's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (0.1% slower) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (0.5% slower), indicating it sits at the top of its performance class. The 211TE, by contrast, competes with parts like the AMD EPYC 7543 (0.7% faster) and the Intel Core i3-1315U (2.3% slower).

For users requiring maximum multi-threaded performance, the i7-14650HX is the clear choice based on the data. Its 16 cores, 24 threads, 30 MB L3 cache, and 5.20 GHz boost clock deliver between 40.3% and 70.9% more performance across the PassMark and Cinebench suites. The mobile BGA 1964 socket means it belongs in laptops or other compact systems, and its unlocked multiplier offers additional configuration flexibility.

The Intel Core 5 211TE, despite its benchmark deficit, serves a distinct purpose. As a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700, it fits into standard desktop motherboards. Its 45 watt TDP and 215 mm² die size suggest a more power-conscious design, and its 10 cores and 16 threads still provide solid multi-threading capability for desktop workloads. The 211TE's 20 MB L3 cache and 4.80 GHz boost clock make it a capable desktop processor, but the recorded data shows it cannot match the i7-14650HX in any performance metric.

The selection between these two processors depends entirely on the target platform. For a mobile system where performance is the priority, the i7-14650HX is the only choice between the two. For a desktop build requiring Socket 1700 compatibility, the 211TE is the available option, with the understanding that its performance profile is significantly lower across all measured benchmarks. The percentile ranks reinforce this: 88th versus 69th places the i7-14650HX in a different performance tier entirely.