Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 211TE compare to the Intel Core i5-14400T in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has an average benchmark score of 27166, while the Intel Core 5 211TE scores 15370. The i5-14400T sits at the 79th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the 211TE sits at the 69th percentile.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 211TE and the Intel Core i5-14400T use the Intel Socket 1700, and both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the core and thread count for each chip?

A: Both processors have 10 cores and 16 threads, with identical per-core cache allocations: 80 KB of L1, 1.25 MB of L2, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Does the Core 5 211TE have a higher boost clock than the i5-14400T?

A: Yes, the Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz compared to the i5-14400T's 4.50 GHz. The 211TE also has a higher base clock at 1.70 GHz versus 1.50 GHz.

Q: Do both chips support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 211TE and the Intel Core i5-14400T support ECC memory, along with PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Q: Which processor has more benchmark wins in direct comparisons?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T wins 16 out of 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The Intel Core 5 211TE wins only one, the PassMark physics test.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 211TE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Intel Core i5-14400T uses Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series. Both are manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel, and both have a die size of 215 mm². The 211TE belongs to the Core 5 generation (Bartlett Lake), while the i5-14400T belongs to the Core i5 generation (Raptor Lake Refresh).

The two chips share the same fundamental core configuration: 10 cores, 16 threads, with identical cache hierarchies. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 1.25 MB per core, and L3 is 20 MB shared. Neither processor appears to have a 3D V-Cache variant. Both are desktop parts with a production status of Active, and both have a locked multiplier.

The key architectural difference lies in operating frequencies. The Core 5 211TE has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The i5-14400T has a lower base clock of 1.50 GHz and a lower boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Despite the higher clocks on the 211TE, the i5-14400T delivers substantially higher performance across almost every benchmark, indicating that the Raptor Lake refresh architecture has a significant IPC advantage over Bartlett Lake in this comparison.

Both chips feature the UHD Graphics 730 integrated GPU, support dual-channel memory, and offer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The 211TE has a rated memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i5-14400T does not have a memory bandwidth figure recorded. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The 211TE was released on 2025-01-12, while the i5-14400T was released earlier on 2024-01-07. The part numbers are SRQDL for the 211TE and SRN3N for the i5-14400T.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows an overwhelming advantage for the Intel Core i5-14400T. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-14400T scores 17189 against the 211TE's 12201, a 29% difference. The single-core R23 result follows the same pattern: 2426 for the i5-14400T versus 1722 for the 211TE, also a 29% gap. This consistent 29% delta appears across all three Cinebench versions (R15, R20, R23) for both single-core and multi-core tests.

The largest single-core deficit for the 211TE appears in PassMark single-thread testing, where the i5-14400T scores 3512 against 1408, a 59.9% difference. This is the biggest margin in any recorded test. The PassMark integer math test shows a 48.2% gap (65667 versus 33991), and the floating point math test shows a 46.8% gap (49139 versus 26150). Data encryption shows a 45.4% difference (13244 versus 7231), and data compression shows a 43.4% difference (235636 versus 133434).

The i5-14400T also leads in PassMark multi-thread performance with a score of 20223 versus 11685, a 42.2% gap. Random string sorting favors the i5-14400T at 25181 versus 14838, a 41.1% gap. Extended instructions show a 40.8% gap (14562 versus 8615). The narrowest win for the i5-14400T is in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 73 against 72, a 1.4% margin.

The only test where the Intel Core 5 211TE wins is PassMark physics, scoring 1278 against the i5-14400T's 1244, a 2.7% edge. This single win does not offset the broader pattern. In every other recorded benchmark, the i5-14400T leads by a double-digit percentage, with most margins between 29% and 60%.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i5-14400T for almost all workloads. It wins 16 of 17 direct benchmark comparisons, and its average benchmark score of 27166 places it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 211TE's 69th percentile and average score of 15370. The i5-14400T's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-9900K (0.3% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (0.4% ahead), indicating it is a well-rounded performer in its tier.

The Intel Core 5 211TE, by contrast, sits near rivals like the AMD EPYC 7543 (0.7% behind) and the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U (2% behind). Its performance profile is closer to lower-tier mobile and server parts than to desktop mainstream chips. The single physics test win is a minor outlier and does not change the overall assessment.

For anyone comparing these two desktop processors, the i5-14400T delivers significantly higher multi-core and single-core performance, despite having lower base and boost clocks. The 211TE's higher clock speeds do not translate into higher benchmark scores, which suggests the i5-14400T's architecture is substantially more efficient per clock.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors:

Name: Intel Core 5 211TE versus Intel Core i5-14400T

Series: None versus Core 14th Gen

Codename: Bartlett Lake versus Raptor Lake-R

Generation: Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) versus Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Base Clock: 1.70 GHz versus 1.50 GHz

Boost Clock: 4.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz

TDP: 45 W versus 35 W

Memory Bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s versus not recorded

Release Date: 2025-01-12 versus 2024-01-07

Part Number: SRQDL versus SRN3N

All other recorded specifications are identical: 10 cores, 16 threads, 10 nm process, 215 mm² die size, 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, 20 MB shared L3, DDR4 and DDR5 support, dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, UHD Graphics 730, desktop market segment, Active production status, locked multiplier, Intel Socket 1700, and a launch MSRP of $221.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400T wins in every Cinebench test (R15, R20, R23, both single and multi-core), all PassMark math and encryption tests, data compression, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. Its largest advantages are in single-threaded workloads (59.9% faster), integer math (48.2%), and floating point math (46.8%). This makes it the clear choice for productivity applications, content creation, and general desktop responsiveness.

The Intel Core 5 211TE wins only the PassMark physics test by a 2.7% margin. This suggests a very narrow advantage in a specific physics simulation workload, but the difference is small enough that it may not be noticeable in real-world use. The 211TE also has a higher boost clock (4.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz) and a higher TDP (45 W versus 35 W), which could matter in scenarios where the higher clock rate is beneficial and power draw is not a constraint.

For power-sensitive builds, the i5-14400T uses less power with a 35 W TDP while delivering substantially higher performance. The 211TE's higher TDP and lower benchmark scores indicate it is less efficient in this comparison. The i5-14400T also has a longer availability window, having been released in January 2024 versus the 211TE's January 2025 release, which may matter for platform maturity and driver support.