Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive outcome: the Intel Core i5-14400 wins all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons. The Intel Core 5 211TE does not secure a single victory in any test. The margin of victory varies significantly across workloads, revealing where the i5-14400’s architectural advantages are most pronounced.

In Cinebench tests, the i5-14400 consistently outperforms the Core 5 211TE by a nearly uniform margin. The Cinebench R15 multicore test shows the i5-14400 scoring 2148 against 1229 for the Core 5 211TE, a delta of -42.8%. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern: 303 versus 173, also -42.8%. This consistency continues in Cinebench R20, where multicore scores are 8952 versus 5124 (-42.8%), and single-core scores are 1263 versus 723 (-42.8%). The Cinebench R23 results repeat the pattern, with the i5-14400 posting 21315 multicore and 3009 single-core, against 12201 and 1722 respectively for the Core 5 211TE, both at -42.8%.

The PassMark suite shows a wider spread of deltas, indicating that some workloads benefit more from the i5-14400’s higher operating characteristics. The largest single-core gap appears in PassMark single-thread and single-threaded tests, where the i5-14400 scores 3741 against 1408 for the Core 5 211TE, a delta of -62.4%. This is the most significant percentage difference in the entire dataset.

Integer math shows a similar lopsided result: the i5-14400 scores 82017 versus 33991, a delta of -58.6%. Floating point math follows closely, with 61549 versus 26150, a delta of -57.5%. Data compression shows 314995 versus 133434, a delta of -57.6%. Extended instructions deliver 19816 versus 8615, a delta of -56.5%. Data encryption results are 16731 versus 7231, a delta of -56.8%.

The multithread PassMark score gives the i5-14400 a 25080 result against 11685 for the Core 5 211TE, a delta of -53.4%. Random string sorting shows 32346 versus 14838, a delta of -54.1%. The narrowest deltas appear in physics simulation and prime number finding. PassMark physics scores 1396 for the i5-14400 versus 1278 for the Core 5 211TE, a delta of only -8.5%. Prime number finding shows 80 versus 72, a delta of -10%. These smaller gaps suggest that the two processors share closer performance characteristics in workloads that depend heavily on raw core count and basic arithmetic throughput rather than memory bandwidth or single-thread efficiency.

The overall average benchmark score reinforces the hierarchy: the i5-14400 averages 32115, while the Core 5 211TE averages 15370. In the database’s percentile ranking against all CPUs, the i5-14400 sits at the 82nd percentile, while the Core 5 211TE sits at the 69th percentile. The nearest rivals for the i5-14400 include the Intel Core i7-12800H (delta 0%), Intel Core i7-13705H (delta 0.1%), and Intel Core i5-14450HX (delta 0.2%), placing it in a tightly contested performance band. The Core 5 211TE’s nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7543 (delta -0.7%), AMD EPYC 7702P (delta 1.6%), AMD Ryzen 3 7440U (delta -2%), and Intel Core i3-1315U (delta 2.3%), indicating it competes in a lower performance tier.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the Intel Core i5-14400 is the superior processor in every measured benchmark. The core and thread counts are identical at 10 cores and 16 threads, so the performance gap must be attributed to other factors. The i5-14400 carries a 2.50 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost clock, while the Core 5 211TE uses a 1.70 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock. The higher base clock of the i5-14400 likely explains much of the gap in sustained workloads, even though the Core 5 211TE has a slightly higher boost ceiling.

The thermal design power differs as well: the i5-14400 is rated at 65 watts, while the Core 5 211TE is rated at 45 watts. This 20-watt difference suggests the i5-14400 has more headroom for sustained multi-core operation, which aligns with its superior multicore results. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21315 versus 12201 represents a 74.7% advantage for the i5-14400, a substantial gap for two processors with identical core counts.

The percentile data confirms the tier separation. The i5-14400 ranks in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Core 5 211TE ranks in the 69th percentile. The nearest rivals for each processor reinforce this distinction: the i5-14400 sits alongside mobile H-series and HX-series chips from Intel’s own lineup, while the Core 5 211TE sits alongside server EPYC parts and low-power mobile chips.

The launch MSRP for both processors is $221. The i5-14400 achieves its higher performance at a lower power envelope per unit of work delivered. For users who prioritize raw performance, the i5-14400 is the clear choice. The Core 5 211TE’s lower power rating might appeal in constrained thermal environments, but the recorded data shows a consistent and often dramatic performance deficit.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400 wins across every recorded benchmark category. There is no workload in the dataset where the Core 5 211TE posts a higher score. However, the magnitude of the i5-14400’s advantage varies by workload type, which informs where each processor might be acceptable.

The i5-14400 delivers its smallest deltas in physics simulation (-8.5%) and prime number finding (-10%). These workloads depend heavily on integer arithmetic and core count rather than memory bandwidth or advanced instruction throughput. Both processors have 10 cores and 16 threads, so these tests show the two chips are closer in capability when the workload is simple and parallel. The i5-14400 still wins, but the gap is modest.

The i5-14400’s largest advantages appear in single-threaded PassMark tests (-62.4%), integer math (-58.6%), and floating point math (-57.5%). These workloads benefit from higher base clocks and more efficient instruction execution per clock cycle. The i5-14400’s 2.50 GHz base clock versus 1.70 GHz on the Core 5 211TE gives it a substantial head start in lightly threaded scenarios. The boost clock difference is smaller (4.70 GHz versus 4.80 GHz), but the base clock matters more for sustained single-core loads.

For multithreaded workloads, the i5-14400’s advantage is also large but slightly narrower. PassMark multithread shows -53.4%, Cinebench R23 multicore shows -42.8%, and data compression shows -57.6%. These workloads scale with core count, and since both chips have the same core and thread counts, the difference comes from the i5-14400’s ability to maintain higher clocks across all cores simultaneously. The 65-watt TDP of the i5-14400 likely permits more sustained all-core boost behavior than the 45-watt Core 5 211TE.

The Core 5 211TE’s only theoretical advantage lies in its lower power rating and its slightly higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. The data shows no benchmark where these factors translate into a win. The Core 5 211TE also has a release date later than the i5-14400, but the newer production date does not yield a performance benefit in any recorded test.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 averages 32115 across all recorded benchmarks, while the Intel Core 5 211TE averages 15370. The i5-14400’s average is roughly double that of the Core 5 211TE.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the Core 5 211TE wins?

A: No. The dataset records 17 head-to-head comparisons, and the Intel Core i5-14400 wins all 17. The Core 5 211TE records zero wins.

Q: What is the closest benchmark result between the two processors?

A: The PassMark physics test shows the smallest delta at -8.5%, with the i5-14400 scoring 1396 and the Core 5 211TE scoring 1278. The PassMark find prime numbers test is close at -10%, with scores of 80 and 72 respectively.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: Both processors have 10 cores and 16 threads. The performance difference is not due to core count but rather to other architectural and operating characteristics.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has a 2.50 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost clock. The Intel Core 5 211TE has a 1.70 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock. The i5-14400 has a higher base clock, while the Core 5 211TE has a slightly higher boost clock.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 is rated at 65 watts, and the Intel Core 5 211TE is rated at 45 watts.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share several fundamental architectural characteristics. They both use the Intel Socket 1700, have a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel, and feature a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy is identical: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and both integrate UHD Graphics 730. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The core architectural difference lies in the design lineage. The Intel Core i5-14400 belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is part of the Core 5 generation. Both are fabricated on the same 10 nm node with the same die size, but the underlying microarchitecture differs. The i5-14400’s Raptor Lake design is a refresh of Intel’s established hybrid architecture, while Bartlett Lake represents a newer product line with a different branding scheme.

The memory bandwidth figures differ in the recorded data. The Core 5 211TE lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i5-14400 does not have a recorded memory bandwidth value. Both support dual-channel memory, and both support DDR4 and DDR5, so the practical bandwidth difference may depend on the specific memory configuration used.

The release dates differ: the i5-14400 was released in January 2024, while the Core 5 211TE was released in January 2025. The part numbers also differ, with the i5-14400 carrying the SRN3QSRN46 identifier and the Core 5 211TE carrying the SRQDL identifier.

The production status for both processors is Active. Both are desktop market segment parts. The i5-14400 is classified in the Core 14th Gen series, while the Core 5 211TE carries no series designation but is identified by its Core 5 generation label. The market positioning differs, but the silicon characteristics show many shared traits: same process node, same die size, same cache structure, same socket, same memory support, and same PCIe configuration. The performance differences measured in the benchmarks must therefore stem from clock behavior, power delivery, and microarchitectural execution efficiency rather than from fundamental resource availability.