Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

The Intel Core 5 211TE and the Intel Core i3-14100F are both desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, yet the benchmark data reveals two distinctly different performance profiles. The Core i3-14100F wins 15 of the 17 recorded head-to-head tests, while the Core 5 211TE takes only 2. Despite the Core 5 211TE offering more cores and threads, the Core i3-14100F consistently delivers higher scores across most workloads, with the single-thread PassMark result showing a remarkable 62.7% gap in its favor.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-14100F is the dominant performer in the vast majority of measured tasks. In all three Cinebench versions, R15, R20, and R23, it wins both the multicore and singlecore tests. The margins are consistent, with the Core i3-14100F holding a 6.7% to 7.0% advantage across all six Cinebench results. This pattern extends to PassMark workloads including data compression, where it leads by 24.2%, and integer math, where it is 25.1% ahead. The Core i3-14100F also wins the PassMark multithread test by 24.2%, the floating point math test by 26.1%, and the extended instructions test by 28.1%. Its largest victory in the entire dataset is the PassMark single-thread test, where its score of 3778 versus 1408 represents a 62.7% lead.

The Intel Core 5 211TE claims wins in two specialized PassMark tests. It outperforms the Core i3-14100F in the find prime numbers test with a score of 72 versus 61, an 18% advantage. It also wins the physics test with 1278 against 1077, a margin of 18.7%. These two victories indicate that the Core 5 211TE has specific strengths in certain mathematical workloads and physics simulations, despite trailing in the broader set of benchmarks. The database shows the Core i3-14100F at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Core 5 211TE sits at the 69th percentile, reinforcing the overall performance ranking.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same Intel Socket 1700, the same 10 nm process node, and the same Intel foundry, but their internal designs diverge significantly. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is classified as Core 5 generation, while the Intel Core i3-14100F belongs to the Raptor Lake family, specifically Raptor Lake-R, under the Core 14th Gen series. The Core 5 211TE packs 10 cores and 16 threads, whereas the Core i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads. This core count difference is substantial, yet the benchmark results show the smaller processor consistently outperforming the larger one.

Cache configurations also differ. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, but the shared L3 cache is not equal. The Core 5 211TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core i3-14100F has 12 MB. Clock speeds tell a different story. The Core 5 211TE has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Core i3-14100F operates at a 3.50 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost. The higher base clock of the Core i3-14100F likely contributes to its single-thread dominance, as the data shows a 62.7% gap in the PassMark single-thread test.

Power and graphics differ as well. The Core 5 211TE has a TDP of 45 watts and includes integrated UHD Graphics 730, while the Core i3-14100F has a TDP of 58 watts and no integrated graphics, as indicated by the N/A field. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The Core 5 211TE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core i3-14100F has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. PCIe support is identical at Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Does the Core 5 211TE have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Core 5 211TE includes UHD Graphics 730. The Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?

A: The Core i3-14100F scores 13084 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is 6.7% higher than the Core 5 211TE score of 12201.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in the PassMark single-thread test, where the Core i3-14100F scores 3778 versus 1408 for the Core 5 211TE, a difference of 62.7%.

Q: In which tests does the Core 5 211TE win?

A: The Core 5 211TE wins the PassMark find prime numbers test with 72 versus 61, and the PassMark physics test with 1278 versus 1077.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 211TE and the Core i3-14100F support ECC memory.

Specification Differences

The processors differ in core count, with the Core 5 211TE at 10 cores versus 4 for the Core i3-14100F. Thread counts follow, 16 versus 8. Base clocks are 1.70 GHz for the Core 5 211TE and 3.50 GHz for the Core i3-14100F. Boost clocks are closer, 4.80 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. TDP differs, 45 watts for the Core 5 211TE and 58 watts for the Core i3-14100F. The codenames are Bartlett Lake for the Core 5 211TE and Raptor Lake-R for the Core i3-14100F. The Core 5 211TE falls under the Core 5 generation, while the Core i3-14100F is in the Core 14th Gen series. L3 cache is 20 MB shared for the Core 5 211TE and 12 MB shared for the Core i3-14100F. The Core 5 211TE has a die size of 215 mm², while the Core i3-14100F has a die size of 163 mm². Integrated graphics are present in the Core 5 211TE as UHD Graphics 730, absent in the Core i3-14100F. The Core 5 211TE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core i3-14100F has no figure recorded. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 211TE is $221, and the launch MSRP for the Core i3-14100F is $109. Release dates differ, with the Core 5 211TE released in January 2025 and the Core i3-14100F released in January 2024. Part numbers are SRQDL for the Core 5 211TE and SRMX2 for the Core i3-14100F.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a uniform pattern of Core i3-14100F victories. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core i3-14100F scores 1318 against 1229 for the Core 5 211TE, a 6.8% margin. The R15 singlecore result is 186 versus 173, a 7.0% difference. Cinebench R20 multicore gives 5495 versus 5124, a 6.8% gap, and R20 singlecore gives 775 versus 723, a 6.7% gap. Cinebench R23 multicore shows 13084 versus 12201, a 6.7% difference, and R23 singlecore shows 1847 versus 1722, a 6.8% margin. These consistent margins across all Cinebench versions indicate that the Core i3-14100F has a stable performance advantage in rendering and CPU-intensive workloads.

The PassMark results show larger gaps in most tests. Data compression favors the Core i3-14100F with 176106 versus 133434, a 24.2% lead. Data encryption shows 8922 versus 7231, a 19% advantage. Extended instructions produce 11984 versus 8615, a 28.1% gap. Floating point math gives 35370 versus 26150, a 26.1% lead. Integer math shows 45357 versus 33991, a 25.1% margin. The multithread test gives 15420 versus 11685, a 24.2% difference. Random string sorting shows 17596 versus 14838, a 15.7% gap. The single-thread test is the outlier, with 3778 versus 1408, a massive 62.7% difference that stands as the largest recorded gap between the two processors.

The Core 5 211TE wins are isolated but notable. In the find prime numbers test, it scores 72 against 61, an 18% advantage. The physics test shows 1278 versus 1077, an 18.7% lead. These two results demonstrate that the Core 5 211TE has specialized strengths, but the overall benchmark data places the Core i3-14100F clearly ahead. The average benchmark score for the Core i3-14100F is 18519, while the Core 5 211TE averages 15370. The Core i3-14100F sits at the 72nd percentile versus the 69th percentile for the Core 5 211TE. The nearest rival data confirms the positioning, with the Core i3-14100F matching the Intel Core i5-13420H at a 0% delta, while the Core 5 211TE sits 0.7% behind the AMD EPYC 7543 and 2.3% ahead of the Intel Core i3-1315U.