Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between the Intel Core 5 211TE and the Intel Core 9 273PQE. Across all 17 recorded tests, the Core 9 273PQE takes the win. The smallest margin appears in PassMark physics, where the Core 9 leads by 53.6%, scoring 2754 against 1278. The largest gap is in PassMark integer math, where the Core 9 delivers 164629 versus 33991, a 79.4% advantage.

Cinebench results follow the same pattern. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core 9 273PQE scores 39190, while the Core 5 211TE manages 12201, a 68.9% deficit. The single-core R23 test shows 5532 versus 1722, also a 68.9% gap. The R20 multicore test shows 16459 against 5124, and R15 multicore shows 3950 against 1229, both with the same 68.9% delta. These consistent deltas across all Cinebench versions indicate the performance difference scales uniformly with workload intensity.

PassMark tests reveal where the Core 9 273PQE stretches its lead furthest. Data compression shows 585752 versus 133434, a 77.2% gap. Extended instructions show 38743 versus 8615, a 77.8% difference. Floating point math delivers 125546 versus 26150, a 79.2% gap. Integer math, as noted, is the widest at 79.4%. Data encryption shows 29636 versus 7231, a 75.6% margin. Random string sorting shows 53167 versus 14838, a 72.1% gap. Multithread performance shows 46107 versus 11685, a 74.7% difference. Find prime numbers shows 198 versus 72, a 63.6% gap.

The Core 9 273PQE also dominates in single-threaded PassMark tests, scoring 4573 against 1408, a 69.2% advantage. This is notable because single-thread performance often reflects architectural efficiency rather than raw core count. The data indicates the Core 9 273PQE holds a substantial lead even when only one thread is active.

The Verdict

The database places the Core 9 273PQE at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the Core 5 211TE sits at the 69th percentile. The average benchmark score for the Core 9 273PQE is 66099, compared to 15370 for the Core 5 211TE. This places the Core 9 273PQE in the company of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, which scores 66159, a 0.1% difference. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, which scores 65914, a 0.3% difference. The Core 5 211TE, by contrast, sits near the AMD EPYC 7543, which scores 15477, a 0.7% difference, and the Intel Core i3-1315U, which scores 15022, a 2.3% difference.

For workloads that demand maximum throughput, the Core 9 273PQE is the clear choice. The data shows no benchmark where the Core 5 211TE comes out ahead. The Core 5 211TE is suitable for systems where lower power consumption and a smaller thermal footprint are priorities, but its performance ceiling is far lower. Builders who need heavy multi-threaded performance, large data set processing, or fast single-thread responsiveness should select the Core 9 273PQE. Builders with modest workloads and power constraints should consider the Core 5 211TE.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use the Bartlett Lake codename and are built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The additional two cores and eight threads explain part of the multi-threaded performance gap.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The Core 5 211TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The Core 9 273PQE has the same 80 KB L1 per core, but 2 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the Core 9 273PQE support its higher throughput in cache-sensitive workloads, such as data compression and integer math.

The Core 5 211TE has a die size of 215 mm². The die size for the Core 9 273PQE is not recorded in the database. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel memory buses. The Core 5 211TE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 9 273PQE reaches 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory and use the Intel Socket 1700. Both provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: the Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 9 273PQE uses UHD Graphics 770. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The base clock of the Core 5 211TE is 1.70 GHz, while the Core 9 273PQE runs at 3.40 GHz. Boost clocks are 4.80 GHz and 5.90 GHz respectively. Thermal design power differs significantly: the Core 5 211TE is rated at 45 W, while the Core 9 273PQE is rated at 125 W. The Core 5 211TE has a launch MSRP of $221, and the Core 9 273PQE has a launch MSRP of $589.

The Core 5 211TE was released on 2025-01-12, and the Core 9 273PQE was released on 2026-03-08. Part numbers are SRQDL for the Core 5 211TE and SA4Q9 for the Core 9 273PQE. Both are desktop market segments and are designated as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE boosts to 5.90 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz.

Q: How much larger is the L3 cache on the Core 9 273PQE?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 5 211TE has 20 MB. The Core 9 273PQE also has 2 MB of L2 per core versus 1.25 MB per core on the Core 5 211TE.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 211TE and the Core 9 273PQE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the thread count difference?

A: The Core 5 211TE has 16 threads, while the Core 9 273PQE has 24 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 211TE.

Q: What is the performance percentile for each processor?

A: The Core 5 211TE is at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, while the Core 9 273PQE is at the 93rd percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PQE wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its largest advantages are in integer math, floating point math, and extended instructions, where it leads by roughly 79%, 79%, and 78% respectively. These tests often reflect raw compute throughput, and the Core 9 273PQE's higher core count, larger caches, and faster clocks drive those results.

The Core 5 211TE's smallest deficit is in PassMark physics, where the Core 9 273PQE leads by 53.6%. Physics tests often rely on a mix of single-thread and multi-thread performance, and the narrower gap suggests the Core 5 211TE handles that specific workload relatively better than others. Still, the Core 9 273PQE wins decisively.

For single-thread responsiveness, the Core 9 273PQE holds a 69.2% advantage in PassMark single-thread tests. This matters for applications that cannot use many cores, such as certain legacy software or lightly threaded games. The Core 9 273PQE also leads by 68.9% in Cinebench R23 single-core, confirming its single-thread dominance.

The Core 5 211TE has a lower TDP of 45 W versus 125 W, making it the more power-conscious option. Its smaller cache and lower clocks reduce performance, but for systems with limited cooling or power budgets, the Core 5 211TE can still handle basic workloads. The Core 9 273PQE, by contrast, is the choice for compute-heavy tasks where the 125 W power draw is acceptable.

The release dates separate the two by over a year, with the Core 9 273PQE launching later. Both processors use the same socket, so platform compatibility is identical. The Core 9 273PQE's integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a step up from the UHD Graphics 730 in the Core 5 211TE, though neither is designed for demanding graphics workloads. The database shows no scenario where the Core 5 211TE outperforms the Core 9 273PQE.