Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core 7 253PTE Comparison
Intel Core 5 211TE
Core 7 253PTE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core 7 253PTE
Intel Core 5 211TE and Intel Core 7 253PTE belong to the same Bartlett Lake family, share the Intel Socket 1700 platform, and both carry the UHD Graphics 730 integrated solution. Despite these commonalities, the recorded benchmark data separates them decisively. The Core 7 253PTE wins every single head-to-head test in the database, 17 victories to zero, with the average benchmark score for the Core 7 253PTE at 34962, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 5 211TE averages 15370, which is the 69th percentile. The performance gap is consistent and substantial, but the nature of that gap varies by workload, which matters for understanding where each processor fits.
Where Each One Wins
The Core 5 211TE does not win any benchmark in the recorded dataset. Every head-to-head comparison, from Cinebench R15 through PassMark's suite, shows the Core 7 253PTE ahead. The practical interpretation is that the Core 5 211TE is not a competitive alternative in any measured workload category. The Core 7 253PTE dominates both single-threaded and multi-threaded tests, as well as specialized operations like data compression, encryption, and floating-point math.
The closest margin for the Core 5 211TE appears in PassMark physics, where the Core 7 253PTE leads by only 3%. This suggests that in physics simulation, the gap narrows considerably. The Core 5 211TE scores 1278 versus 1318 for the Core 7 253PTE. That is the only test within single-digit percentage difference. Every other benchmark shows the Core 7 253PTE leading by at least 12.2%, and most gaps exceed 40%.
For use-case planning, the Core 7 253PTE is the clear choice for integer-heavy computation, floating-point workloads, encryption tasks, and multi-threaded rendering. The Core 5 211TE, while slower across the board, still delivers functional desktop performance with its 10 cores and 16 threads, but the database shows no workload where it takes the lead.
Architecture Differences
Both processors use the same 10 nm process node from Intel and share the Bartlett Lake codename. The Core 5 211TE features 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 253PTE also has 10 cores but 20 threads. This thread count difference comes from the Core 7 253PTE supporting simultaneous multithreading on all cores, whereas the Core 5 211TE appears to have fewer threads enabled.
Cache configurations differ notably. The Core 5 211TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The Core 7 253PTE matches the L1 at 80 KB per core but increases L2 to 2 MB per core and L3 to 33 MB shared. The larger cache hierarchy on the Core 7 253PTE contributes to its higher scores in data compression (275828 versus 133434) and random string sorting (28227 versus 14838).
Base clock speeds are close: 1.70 GHz for the Core 5 211TE and 1.80 GHz for the Core 7 253PTE. Boost clocks diverge more significantly, with the Core 5 211TE reaching 4.80 GHz and the Core 7 253PTE boosting to 5.40 GHz. Both processors have a 45 W TDP and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Memory bandwidth favors the Core 7 253PTE, listed at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 211TE. Both support ECC memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.
The Core 5 211TE has a die size of 215 mm², while the die size for the Core 7 253PTE is not recorded in the database. Both processors are active production parts, use the same integrated UHD Graphics 730, and lack an unlocked multiplier. Release dates differ, with the Core 5 211TE launching earlier and the Core 7 253PTE following later.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more threads?
A: The Core 7 253PTE has 20 threads, while the Core 5 211TE has 16 threads. Both have 10 cores.
Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?
A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and both support ECC memory.
Q: What is the boost clock difference?
A: The Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the Core 7 253PTE reaches 5.40 GHz, a 0.60 GHz advantage.
Q: How much larger is the L3 cache on the Core 7 253PTE?
A: The Core 7 253PTE has 33 MB of shared L3, compared to 20 MB on the Core 5 211TE.
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The Core 7 253PTE has an average score of 34962, more than double the Core 5 211TE's 15370.
Q: Are both processors on the same socket?
A: Yes, both use Intel Socket 1700 and share the same 10 nm process node from Intel.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several recorded specifications. Thread count: 16 threads on the Core 5 211TE versus 20 threads on the Core 7 253PTE. Base clock: 1.70 GHz versus 1.80 GHz. Boost clock: 4.80 GHz versus 5.40 GHz. L2 cache per core: 1.25 MB versus 2 MB. L3 cache shared: 20 MB versus 33 MB. Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. Die size: 215 mm² for the Core 5 211TE, not recorded for the Core 7 253PTE. Release date differs, with the Core 5 211TE launching earlier. Launch MSRP for the Core 5 211TE is $221, and for the Core 7 253PTE it is $384.
Identical specifications include: 10 cores, 45 W TDP, Intel Socket 1700, 10 nm process, Intel foundry, 80 KB L1 per core, DDR4/DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, UHD Graphics 730, desktop market segment, active production status, and locked multiplier.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The largest single gap appears in PassMark integer math. The Core 7 253PTE scores 119552, while the Core 5 211TE manages 33991, a delta of 71.6% in favor of the Core 7 253PTE. This indicates a major advantage in integer-heavy workloads such as general computation and certain scientific tasks.
Floating-point math shows a 61.1% gap, with the Core 7 253PTE scoring 67209 versus 26150 for the Core 5 211TE. Single-thread PassMark results show a 62.9% difference, with scores of 3794 and 1408. The Cinebench suite shows consistent 42.7% gaps across all versions, both multi-core and single-core. For example, Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21276 for the Core 7 253PTE, 12201 for the Core 5 211TE. Single-core R23: 3003 versus 1722.
Data compression and encryption show 51.6% and 53.3% gaps, respectively, with the Core 7 253PTE reaching 275828 in compression and 15500 in encryption. Extended instructions follow at 49.6% (17099 versus 8615). Random string sorting shows a 47.4% gap. The smallest gap is in PassMark physics, where the Core 7 253PTE leads by only 3%, scoring 1318 versus 1278.
The Core 7 253PTE also leads in multi-thread PassMark by 53.3%, scoring 25031 versus 11685. The find prime numbers test shows a 12.2% gap, with scores of 82 and 72. All 17 head-to-head benchmarks record the Core 7 253PTE as the winner, with no test favoring the Core 5 211TE.
The Verdict
The data presents a one-sided comparison. The Core 7 253PTE outperforms the Core 5 211TE in every recorded benchmark, with an average score of 34962 compared to 15370. The Core 7 253PTE sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 211TE sits in the 69th percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core 7 253PTE include the Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Core i9-12900HX, both within 0.1% of its average score, indicating that this processor competes at a high-performance mobile and desktop level. The Core 5 211TE's nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7543 and AMD Ryzen 3 7440U, with deltas ranging from 2.3% to 2% difference, showing it slots into a much lower performance tier.
For workloads requiring maximum throughput in multi-threaded rendering, integer math, or data compression, the Core 7 253PTE is the only choice between these two based on the benchmark evidence. The Core 5 211TE remains a functional processor with 10 cores and 16 threads, but its performance ceiling is far lower. The 12.2% gap in prime number finding and the 3% gap in physics are the only areas where the Core 5 211TE comes close, but it still loses. The Core 7 253PTE delivers 5.40 GHz boost, 33 MB L3, and 20 threads, all of which contribute to its dominance. The Core 5 211TE offers lower clocks, smaller cache, and fewer threads, which the benchmark results confirm. For any application where performance matters, the recorded data points to the Core 7 253PTE without exception.