Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

The Core 5 211TE and Core 7 150HL are both 45-watt, Intel Socket 1700 desktop processors built on Intel's 10 nm process, yet they occupy different positions in the database's performance hierarchy. The Core 5 211TE, released in January 2025, shows an average benchmark score of 15370 and sits at the 69th percentile of all CPUs measured. The Core 7 150HL, released in April 2024, holds the 50th percentile with no recorded average benchmark score, meaning direct numerical comparison relies entirely on the Core 5's measured data. The Core 5 211TE delivers a full set of benchmark results across Cinebench and Passmark workloads, while the Core 7 150HL has no recorded scores in the database. For any user selecting between these two, the data favors the Core 5 211TE for compute-heavy tasks, though the Core 7 150HL offers architectural advantages in core count and integrated graphics that the Core 5 lacks.

The Verdict

The benchmark database contains complete test results for the Core 5 211TE and none for the Core 7 150HL. This asymmetry defines the practical verdict. The Core 5 211TE achieves a 69th percentile ranking across all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15370. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD EPYC 7543 at 15477 (0.7% higher), the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U at 15682 (2% higher), the AMD EPYC 7702P at 15130 (1.6% lower), and the Intel Core i3-1315U at 15022 (2.3% lower). This places the Core 5 211TE in a competitive band among server and mobile parts, indicating strong multi-threaded performance for its 45-watt envelope.

The Core 7 150HL, by contrast, has no recorded benchmarks and no average score, making any performance verdict impossible from the database. Its 50th percentile ranking is listed, but without measured workloads, that figure cannot be interpreted against the Core 5's 69th percentile with any precision. What the data does show is a structural difference: the Core 7 150HL uses 14 cores and 20 threads, versus 10 cores and 16 threads for the Core 5 211TE. It also carries Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while the Core 5 uses UHD Graphics 730. For users who need integrated graphics capability and more physical cores, the Core 7 150HL is the only choice with those attributes. For users who need verified performance results, the Core 5 211TE is the only processor with recorded scores.

The absence of Core 7 150HL benchmark data does not permit a claim of superiority in either direction. The database shows the Core 5 211TE as a measured, active product with a launch MSRP of $221 and a full suite of test results. The Core 7 150HL appears as an active product with no launch MSRP and no test data. The verdict from the recorded data is clear: the Core 5 211TE is the validated performer, and the Core 7 150HL remains unquantified.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a socket, TDP, process node, and memory support, but diverge in nearly every other architectural detail. The Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation, while the Core 7 150HL uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename and belongs to the Core 7 generation. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process at Intel's foundry, and both run at a 45-watt TDP.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. That difference of 4 cores and 4 threads gives the Core 7 a structural advantage in parallel workloads, assuming all cores scale equally, which the database cannot confirm without benchmark data. Clock speeds also favor the Core 7 150HL. Its base clock is 2.40 GHz and boost clock is 5.00 GHz, compared to 1.70 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost for the Core 5 211TE. The Core 7 starts at a higher base frequency and reaches a higher boost frequency.

Cache hierarchies show a similar pattern. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: the Core 5 211TE has 1.25 MB per core, while the Core 7 150HL has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is larger on the Core 7 as well, with 24 MB shared versus 20 MB shared on the Core 5. The die size is recorded only for the Core 5 211TE at 215 mm², with no die size listed for the Core 7 150HL.

The integrated graphics differ substantially. The Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The Iris Xe branding typically indicates a higher-tier integrated GPU, and the 96EU execution unit count is a concrete specification. Memory support is identical: both support DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 211TE records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 150HL has no memory bandwidth figure listed. ECC memory support is another differentiator: the Core 5 211TE supports ECC, the Core 7 150HL does not.

PCIe capabilities also diverge. The Core 5 211TE uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 150HL uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Core 5's PCIe Gen 5 interface provides double the per-lane bandwidth of Gen 4, and its 16 lanes double the lane count. This gives the Core 5 a clear advantage for discrete GPU and NVMe connectivity. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports unlocked overclocking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database lists no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Core 5 211TE and the Core 7 150HL. The Core 7 150HL has an empty benchmarks array, so no Cinebench or Passmark scores exist for it. All numerical performance analysis must therefore come from the Core 5 211TE's own recorded results, interpreted against its percentile ranking and nearest rivals.

The Core 5 211TE posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12201 and a single-core score of 1722. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5124 multi-core and 723 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1229 multi-core and 173 single-core. These results place the Core 5 at the 69th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7543, scores 15477 on average, just 0.7% higher. The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U scores 15682, 2% higher. The AMD EPYC 7702P scores 15130, 1.6% lower, and the Intel Core i3-1315U scores 15022, 2.3% lower. These deltas show the Core 5 211TE operating in a tight performance band where the difference between it and its nearest rivals is under 3% in all cases.

Passmark results for the Core 5 211TE show strong integer and floating-point performance. The integer math score is 33991, floating-point math is 26150, and extended instructions score is 8615. Data compression scores 133434, data encryption scores 7231, and random string sorting scores 14838. The physics score is 1278, and the find prime numbers score is 72. The multithread score is 11685, and the single-thread score is 1408. These figures indicate a processor that handles both scalar and vector workloads competently within its 45-watt power class.

Because the Core 7 150HL has no benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison cannot proceed beyond structural specifications. The Core 7 has more cores, more threads, higher clocks, and more L3 cache, which would typically suggest higher multi-threaded throughput. The Core 5 has a higher measured percentile, PCIe Gen 5 support, ECC memory support, and a recorded average score. The database does not contain the evidence needed to declare a winner in any specific workload between the two.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 211TE also records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 150HL has no memory bandwidth figure listed.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Core 5 211TE supports ECC memory. The Core 7 150HL does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in integrated graphics?

A: The Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Q: What are the clock speeds of each processor?

A: The Core 5 211TE has a 1.70 GHz base clock and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. The Core 7 150HL has a 2.40 GHz base clock and a 5.00 GHz boost clock.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The Core 5 211TE ranks at the 69th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 7 150HL ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the Core 5 211TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: Yes, it has a full suite of Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark scores. The Core 7 150HL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: What is the PCIe configuration for each processor?

A: The Core 5 211TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Core 7 150HL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 211TE wins in every category where measured data exists. Its 69th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 15370 are the only verified performance figures between the two processors. It also holds structural advantages in PCIe connectivity, offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes versus Gen 4 with 8 lanes, which directly benefits discrete graphics and high-speed storage. ECC memory support gives it an edge for data integrity in workstation or server-adjacent workloads. Its launch MSRP of $221 is the only price data available, though affordability is not the focus here. The Core 5's L3 cache is 20 MB, and its die size is 215 mm², both recorded specifications.

The Core 7 150HL wins in raw architectural specifications. It has 4 more cores and 4 more threads, a higher base clock of 2.40 GHz versus 1.70 GHz, and a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. Its L2 cache is 2 MB per core versus 1.25 MB per core, and its L3 cache is 24 MB versus 20 MB. Its Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a higher-tier integrated GPU than the UHD Graphics 730. These specifications suggest the Core 7 150HL is the stronger candidate for heavily threaded workloads and for systems relying on integrated graphics, provided its performance matches its specifications, which the database does not verify.

For use cases, the data supports a clear split. The Core 5 211TE is the appropriate choice for systems requiring PCIe Gen 5 bandwidth, ECC memory support, and a processor with verified performance results. The Core 7 150HL is the appropriate choice for systems prioritizing core count, thread count, higher clock speeds, larger cache, and a more capable integrated GPU. The Core 5's measured results place it among rivals like the AMD EPYC 7543 and the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U, with deltas under 3%. The Core 7's lack of data means it cannot be placed in any comparative benchmark context. The database records the Core 5 211TE as the only one of the two with proven compute performance, while the Core 7 150HL remains a specification sheet without test validation.