AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D

CORE STATE Vermeer
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 96 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 105W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 211TE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.7 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
230,392
133,434
passmark_data_encryption
13,967
7,231
passmark_extended_instructions
15,925
8,615
passmark_find_prime_numbers
170
72
passmark_floating_point_math
34,511
26,150
passmark_integer_math
60,033
33,991
passmark_multithread
20,363
11,685
passmark_physics
2,282
1,278
passmark_random_string_sorting
23,675
14,838
passmark_single_thread
2,941
1,408
passmark_singlethread
2,941
1,408
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
1,229
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
173
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
5,124
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
723
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
12,201
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
1,722

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D vs Intel Core 5 211TE

The Verdict

The benchmark data delivers a decisive outcome. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D wins all 11 recorded head-to-head tests against the Intel Core 5 211TE. The AMD processor posts an average benchmark score of 37,018, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel chip manages an average of 15,370, sitting in the 69th percentile. The Ryzen 5 5500X3D is the clear choice for users prioritizing raw compute performance across every measured category, from data compression to single-threaded workloads. The Intel Core 5 211TE, with its lower TDP of 45 watts compared to the AMD part's 105 watts, serves a different purpose: it is the pick for systems where power efficiency and integrated graphics matter more than peak throughput. The data shows no scenario within these benchmarks where the Intel chip outperforms the AMD part, so the verdict is straightforward: choose the Ryzen 5 5500X3D for performance, choose the Core 5 211TE for its energy profile and built-in display output.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It packs 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy is notable: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a massive 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is the defining feature of the X3D line. The die size measures 74 mm², and the chip supports DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes is available. There is no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The socket is AMD AM4, and the processor is unlocked? No, the multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is restricted.

The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It offers 10 cores and 16 threads, with a much lower base clock of 1.70 GHz but a significantly higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache configuration differs sharply: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and just 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The die is larger at 215 mm². Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel, with a higher memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes is present, a generation ahead of the AMD part. This chip includes integrated UHD Graphics 730, making it a self-contained desktop solution. It uses Intel Socket 1700, and the multiplier is locked. The launch MSRP is $221, though this price should not be interpreted as a value assessment, only as a recorded launch figure.

The core count difference is stark: Intel brings 10 cores and 16 threads against AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads. Yet the AMD chip compensates with its much larger L3 cache, which is 96 MB versus 20 MB. The clock behavior also differs: Intel boosts 0.80 GHz higher, but AMD starts from a 1.30 GHz higher base. The process node advantage goes to AMD at 7 nm versus 10 nm, and the die size difference (74 mm² versus 215 mm²) reflects the distinct implementations. The memory bandwidth edge belongs to Intel at 76.8 GB/s, but the cache capacity edge belongs to AMD.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data shows a clean sweep for the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D. The largest margin comes in the passmark_find_prime_numbers test, where AMD scores 170 against Intel's 72, a delta of 136.1%. This test, which stresses integer arithmetic and branch prediction, highlights how the AMD architecture handles repetitive computational loops.

The single-threaded results are almost as lopsided. In passmark_single_thread, AMD scores 2,941 versus Intel's 1,408, a delta of 108.9%. The same margin appears in the duplicate passmark_singlethread test. This indicates that even with Intel's higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz, the Zen 3 core delivers more instructions per clock in this workload, likely aided by the 96 MB L3 cache.

Data encryption shows AMD at 13,967 versus Intel's 7,231, a delta of 93.2%. Extended instructions follow a similar pattern: AMD scores 15,925, Intel scores 8,615, a delta of 84.9%. These tests rely on cryptographic and SIMD operations, where the larger cache and tighter core design give AMD the advantage.

Integer math delivers AMD 60,033 against Intel's 33,991, a delta of 76.6%. The multithreaded test shows AMD at 20,363 versus Intel's 11,685, a delta of 74.3%. The physics test, which simulates rigid body dynamics, has AMD at 2,282 and Intel at 1,278, a delta of 78.6%. Data compression is closer in percentage terms but still decisive: AMD scores 230,392, Intel scores 133,434, a delta of 72.7%. Random string sorting shows AMD at 23,675 versus Intel's 14,838, a delta of 59.6%. Floating point math has the smallest margin: AMD 34,511, Intel 26,150, a delta of 32%.

Across all 11 tests, the average delta favors AMD by roughly 85%, with the narrowest gap still a 32% win. The Intel chip never comes within striking distance in any category. The data also includes Cinebench results for the Intel part alone (R15 multicore 1,229, R15 singlecore 173, R20 multicore 5,124, R20 singlecore 723, R23 multicore 12,201, R23 singlecore 1,722), but the AMD chip has no corresponding Cinebench entries in the database, so a direct comparison in those specific tests is not possible.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the AMD chip wins all 11 head-to-head benchmark tests.

Q: What is the L3 cache difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D has 96 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The 76 MB difference is the largest architectural gap between the two processors.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). This means the AMD chip requires a separate graphics card.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D has a TDP of 105 watts, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel chip consumes less than half the power budget of the AMD part.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D supports only DDR4, with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel chip has a theoretical memory bandwidth advantage, though benchmark results still favor AMD.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 211TE ranks in the 69th percentile. This places the AMD chip in a higher overall performance tier.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D wins every recorded benchmark category, but the degree of dominance varies by workload. The largest wins come from prime number finding (136.1% ahead), single-threaded performance (108.9% ahead), and data encryption (93.2% ahead). These results indicate the AMD chip is particularly strong in integer-heavy, latency-sensitive tasks where the 96 MB L3 cache reduces memory stalls. The smallest win, floating point math at 32%, still represents a substantial gap. For users running scientific simulations, cryptographic workloads, compression tools, or any single-threaded application, the Ryzen 5 5500X3D is the superior processor according to the data.

The Intel Core 5 211TE does not win any of the 11 head-to-head tests, but it has qualitative advantages that the benchmarks do not capture numerically. It carries integrated graphics, so a system built around it does not need a discrete GPU. Its 45 watt TDP makes it suitable for compact or power-constrained desktop builds, and its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory offers platform flexibility. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration provides more parallel hardware threads, even though the benchmark results show the AMD part outperforming it in multithreaded workloads. The higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz suggests potential in bursty, short-duration tasks, though the recorded single-thread score of 1,408 versus AMD's 2,941 contradicts that expectation in practice.

For a use-case split based strictly on the data: choose the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D for any workload where compute speed is the primary requirement, including data processing, encryption, physics calculations, and general productivity. Choose the Intel Core 5 211TE for systems where the 60 watt TDP reduction matters, where integrated graphics eliminate the need for a discrete card, or where the platform must accept both DDR4 and DDR5 modules. The database shows no performance scenario where the Intel chip takes the lead, so the decision hinges entirely on power efficiency and integrated features rather than benchmark wins.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 5500X3D
5 211TE
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3
1.7 -43.3%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4
4.8 +20.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3
1.7 -43.3%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4
4.8 +20.0%
Multiplier
33
17 -48.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
96 MB (shared)
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
105
45 -57.1%
PL1
45 W
PL2
106 W
PPT
142 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Codename
Vermeer
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 3 (Vermeer))
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Die Size
74 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
AMD 300 Series*, AMD 400 Series, AMD 500 Series
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1300 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
12 nm
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$221
Part Number
100-000001504
SRQDL
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
90°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View Ryzen 5 5500X3D Details View Core 5 211TE Details