Intel Core 5 210H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T dominates the head-to-head comparison, winning 16 of 17 recorded benchmarks against the Intel Core 5 210H. The only victory for the Core 5 210H comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 61503 against 59543, a 3.3% advantage. This single win highlights a narrow strength in basic arithmetic workloads, but the overall performance gap heavily favors the Ultra 5 225T.

The largest delta appears in PassMark find prime numbers, where the Ultra 5 225T scores 284 versus just 53 for the Core 5 210H, an 81.3% difference. This result indicates a massive advantage in prime number computation, a workload sensitive to architectural efficiency and clock speed. Similarly, Cinebench R23 multicore shows a 46.2% gap, with the Ultra 5 225T scoring 21971 against 11830. The single-core R23 result follows the same pattern: 3101 versus 1771, a 42.9% deficit for the Core 5 210H.

Cinebench R20 repeats the trend. The Ultra 5 225T scores 9227 in multicore and 1302 in single-core, while the Core 5 210H manages 6504 and 918 respectively, both 29.5% behind. Cinebench R15 shows a smaller but still significant gap: 2214 versus 1757 in multicore (20.6%) and 312 versus 247 in single-core (20.8%). These consistent Cinebench results confirm that the Ultra 5 225T delivers superior rendering performance across all versions of the test.

PassMark multithread tests show a 28% advantage for the Ultra 5 225T, scoring 25358 against 18252. Floating point math reveals a 45.6% gap, with 82751 versus 45057. Extended instructions follow at 33.4%, with scores of 20083 and 13370. Data encryption shows the same 33.4% delta, recording 18289 versus 12187. Physics tests display a 49.3% difference, 2053 versus 1040. Random string sorting is 18.5% faster on the Ultra 5 225T, 28774 versus 23451. Data compression shows the smallest multi-core gap at 6.9%, 233998 versus 217805. Single-thread PassMark results give the Ultra 5 225T a 18.6% edge, 4348 versus 3539.

The average benchmark score reinforces the hierarchy. The Core 5 210H averages 24872, while the Ultra 5 225T averages 30468, a 22.5% overall difference. In the database percentile rankings, the Ultra 5 225T sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 210H rests at the 77th. The nearest rivals for the Core 5 210H include the Intel Core i7-13620H (average 24911, 0.2% above), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (24822, 0.2% below), Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, 0.3% above), and AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24964, 0.4% above). For the Ultra 5 225T, the closest competitors are the Intel Core i9-11980HK (30422, 0.2% below), AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (30390, 0.3% below), Intel Core i5-13600H (30548, 0.3% above), and AMD Ryzen 7 7736U (30364, 0.3% below). These placements show that the Core 5 210H competes with older high-end mobile chips, while the Ultra 5 225T matches recent mid-range desktop and mobile processors.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and are built for different segments. The Intel Core 5 210H uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H variant, and belongs to the Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, and belongs to the Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) generation. It is built on a 3 nm process node by TSMC. The Ultra 5 225T has 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, while transistor count and die size are not recorded for the Core 5 210H.

Core configuration differs significantly. The Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads, indicating a hybrid layout with performance and efficiency cores. The Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads, which suggests a design without hyperthreading on any core type. Base clocks favor the Ultra 5 225T at 2.50 GHz versus 2.20 GHz, and boost clocks also favor it at 4.90 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. Thermal design power is much higher for the Ultra 5 225T at 65 watts, compared to 45 watts for the Core 5 210H, reflecting its desktop orientation.

Cache hierarchies diverge substantially. The Core 5 210H has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 5 225T has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core caches on the Ultra 5 225T align with its newer architecture.

Memory support differs as well. The Core 5 210H supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration; memory bandwidth is not recorded. The Ultra 5 225T supports only DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with a recorded bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity shows a major gap. The Core 5 210H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU only. The Ultra 5 225T provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU only, a much wider interface for expansion.

Integrated graphics also differ. The Core 5 210H uses Iris Xe Graphics with 48 execution units. The Ultra 5 225T uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units. The Core 5 210H has more execution units, which may benefit certain graphics workloads, though the architecture of the Arc solution is newer.

Sockets and market segments reflect their intended platforms. The Core 5 210H uses Intel BGA 1744 and targets mobile systems. The Ultra 5 225T uses Intel Socket 1851 and targets desktop systems. Release dates are close: the Core 5 210H launched on 2024-12-17, and the Ultra 5 225T launched on 2024-12-31. The Core 5 210H has a recorded launch MSRP of $342; no launch MSRP is listed for the Ultra 5 225T. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads. The Intel Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads. The Ultra 5 225T has more cores, while the Core 5 210H has more threads than cores, indicating hyperthreading support.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Ultra 5 225T scores 21971 versus 11830 for the Core 5 210H, a 46.2% advantage. This is the largest multicore delta in the Cinebench suite.

Q: Does the Core 5 210H win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Core 5 210H wins PassMark integer math with a score of 61503 against 59543, a 3.3% margin. This is the sole victory in the head-to-head comparison.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 5 210H supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Ultra 5 225T supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The Core 5 210H has Iris Xe Graphics with 48 execution units. The Ultra 5 225T has Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units. The Core 5 210H has more execution units.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Core 5 210H is manufactured on a 10 nm node by Intel. The Ultra 5 225T is manufactured on a 3 nm node by TSMC. The Ultra 5 225T also has 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core 5 210H | Intel Core Ultra 5 225T |

|-------|-------------------|-------------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-H | Arrow Lake-S |

| Generation | Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 243 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 102.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 48EU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-12-17 | 2024-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $342 | Not listed |

| Part Number | SRQ6RQ5MN | Unknown |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins across nearly every measured workload. Its strongest advantages appear in prime number finding (81.3% ahead), physics simulation (49.3%), floating point math (45.6%), and Cinebench R23 multicore (46.2%). These results indicate superiority in compute-heavy tasks such as rendering, scientific calculations, and physics-based applications. The 20 MB L3 cache and 3 nm process node likely contribute to these gains, though the database does not isolate those factors.

The Ultra 5 225T also leads in single-thread performance by 18.6% in PassMark and 42.9% in Cinebench R23 single-core. This makes it the better choice for applications that rely on single-core speed, such as older games or lightly threaded software. Its desktop socket and 65 W TDP allow sustained operation at higher power, which aligns with its benchmark dominance.

The Intel Core 5 210H wins only in PassMark integer math, with a 3.3% edge. This narrow victory suggests a slight advantage in tasks that involve basic integer operations, such as certain database operations or legacy code paths. However, the margin is small and isolated to a single test. The Core 5 210H also has more execution units in its integrated graphics (48 versus 16), which may provide better iGPU performance for video playback or light graphics work, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The Core 5 210H uses a mobile socket (BGA 1744) and supports DDR4 memory, which may be relevant for systems with existing DDR4 modules. Its 45 W TDP indicates lower power draw than the 65 W Ultra 5 225T. For mobile deployments where power efficiency matters, the Core 5 210H may be easier to integrate, but the recorded benchmarks do not measure power consumption.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T for performance-oriented use. It wins 16 of 17 benchmarks, with an average score of 30468 versus 24872. The 82nd percentile ranking versus the 77th percentile confirms its higher standing in the database. For any workload that benefits from multicore throughput, rendering, encryption, or single-thread speed, the Ultra 5 225T is the superior choice based on recorded measurements.

The Core 5 210H remains relevant only in specific scenarios. Its win in integer math, while narrow, shows competence in that niche. Its mobile form factor and support for DDR4 memory may suit upgrade paths for existing laptops. The 45 W TDP also suggests lower power requirements, which could matter in thermally constrained environments. However, the benchmark data does not show a broader performance advantage.

For users comparing these two processors, the Ultra 5 225T delivers consistently higher scores across Cinebench and PassMark suites. The only reason to select the Core 5 210H would be platform compatibility, such as a BGA 1744 socket requirement or DDR4 memory support. The Ultra 5 225T's desktop socket and DDR5-only support limit it to newer systems. The launch MSRP of $342 for the Core 5 210H provides a price reference, while no MSRP is recorded for the Ultra 5 225T.

The verdict from the database is straightforward: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is the faster processor by a wide margin, with the Core 5 210H holding a single narrow victory. Performance-sensitive buyers should choose the Ultra 5 225T. Those constrained by socket or memory compatibility may still find the Core 5 210H functional, but the recorded data shows no other competitive advantage.