Intel Core 5 210H vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

The Intel Core 5 210H and Intel Core 7 251TE present a stark contrast in design philosophy and target application, despite both carrying the Core branding. The data shows a complete sweep for the Core 7 251TE across all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, yet the two processors are engineered for fundamentally different environments. The Core 5 210H is a mobile part built for battery-conscious laptops, while the Core 7 251TE is a desktop part with a much larger core count and higher power envelope. This analysis breaks down the recorded performance data, architectural differences, and what the benchmark numbers imply for each processor's intended role.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core 7 251TE wins every single head-to-head comparison in the database, from single-threaded tests to heavily parallel workloads. The Core 5 210H does not record a single victory across the 17 benchmark entries. This is not a close contest; the Core 7 251TE outperforms the Core 5 210H in every measured category, including multi-threaded render workloads, integer math, floating-point math, and data compression.

The magnitude of the Core 7 251TE's advantage varies significantly by workload type. In single-threaded performance, the gap is narrow, with the Core 7 251TE leading by only 0.8% in the Passmark single-thread test. This indicates that per-core efficiency is similar, and the Core 5 210H holds its own when only one core is active. However, as the workload scales across multiple cores, the Core 7 251TE pulls ahead dramatically. The Cinebench R23 multi-core test shows a 53.6% advantage for the Core 7 251TE, and the Passmark integer math test shows a 51.1% lead. The Core 7 251TE also delivers a 62.1% lead in the Passmark find prime numbers test, which is heavily dependent on parallel processing capability.

For the Core 5 210H, its competitive position lies not in winning benchmarks but in its mobility class. It operates within a 45W TDP, same as the Core 7 251TE, but it is designed for the Intel BGA 1744 socket, indicating a soldered mobile implementation. The Core 5 210H posts an average benchmark score of 24872, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-13620H and AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, have nearly identical average scores, within 0.4% of the Core 5 210H. This shows the Core 5 210H is a solid mid-range mobile option, but it is not a performance leader.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Core 5 210H uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H codename, built on Intel's 10nm process. It belongs to the Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. In contrast, the Intel Core 7 251TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, also on a 10nm process, but it is classified under the Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The die size also differs, with the Core 7 251TE measuring 215 mm², while the die size for the Core 5 210H is not recorded in the database.

Core configuration is the most significant architectural split. The Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads, while the Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. This is a 3x difference in core count and a 2.67x difference in thread count. The cache hierarchy reflects this disparity. The Core 5 210H has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 7 251TE has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core but a much larger 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core for both.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Core 5 210H has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Core 7 251TE has a lower base clock of 1.40 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This suggests the Core 7 251TE is designed to idle lower but ramp up to higher single-core speeds when needed. Memory support is similar, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. The Core 7 251TE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core 5 210H's memory bandwidth is not listed.

PCIe capabilities differ substantially. The Core 5 210H provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 251TE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Core 7 251TE twice the CPU-attached PCIe bandwidth, which is relevant for desktop expansion. The integrated graphics also differ: the Core 5 210H uses Iris Xe Graphics 48EU, while the Core 7 251TE uses UHD Graphics 770. The Core 7 251TE also supports ECC memory, while the Core 5 210H does not. The socket types reflect their intended platforms: the Core 5 210H is on Intel BGA 1744 (mobile), and the Core 7 251TE is on Intel Socket 1700 (desktop).

The Verdict

The data points to a clear separation of roles. The Intel Core 7 251TE is the superior processor in absolute performance terms, with an average benchmark score of 41650, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H and Intel Core i7-14650HX, with scores within 0.2% of the Core 7 251TE. This places it in a high-performance desktop tier, suitable for demanding multi-threaded workloads such as video rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing.

The Intel Core 5 210H, with its 77th percentile ranking and average score of 24872, is positioned as a capable mobile processor. Its performance profile is comparable to the Intel Core i7-13620H and AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, which are established mobile or low-power desktop parts. The Core 5 210H's 8-core, 12-thread configuration with a 4.80 GHz boost clock is suited for everyday computing, productivity applications, and moderately threaded workloads in a laptop form factor.

For users selecting between these two, the decision hinges on the platform. The Core 7 251TE is a desktop processor on Socket 1700, while the Core 5 210H is a mobile processor on BGA 1744. They are not interchangeable. The Core 7 251TE delivers roughly double the performance in multi-threaded benchmarks, as evidenced by the 53.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and the 51.1% lead in Passmark integer math. The Core 5 210H, however, offers a much closer single-threaded performance, trailing by only 0.8% in Passmark single-thread. The Core 5 210H also uses less silicon area and is built for power-sensitive mobile designs, though both share a 45W TDP rating.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 210H has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The Core 7 251TE also supports ECC memory, while the Core 5 210H does not.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 210H has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel Core 7 251TE has a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has an average benchmark score of 41650, compared to 24872 for the Intel Core 5 210H.

Q: What are the socket types for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 210H uses Intel BGA 1744, while the Intel Core 7 251TE uses Intel Socket 1700.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results show a consistent pattern of dominance for the Intel Core 7 251TE. The largest margin is in the Passmark find prime numbers test, where the Core 7 251TE scores 140 versus 53 for the Core 5 210H, a 62.1% advantage. This test is highly parallel, and the Core 7 251TE's 24 cores provide a massive throughput advantage.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 7 251TE scores 25518 against 11830 for the Core 5 210H, a 53.6% lead. The single-core version of the same test shows a 50.8% lead, with scores of 3602 and 1771 respectively. This indicates that even in single-threaded rendering tasks, the Core 7 251TE's higher 5.40 GHz boost clock provides a significant edge over the Core 5 210H's 4.80 GHz.

The Passmark integer math test shows a 51.1% lead, with the Core 7 251TE scoring 125739 versus 61503. Floating-point math shows a 47.4% lead, with scores of 85607 and 45057. Data compression shows a 34.9% lead, with the Core 7 251TE scoring 334399 versus 217805. Data encryption shows a 45% lead, with scores of 22176 and 12187.

The closest contest is in the Passmark single-thread test, where the Core 7 251TE scores 3568 versus 3539 for the Core 5 210H, a mere 0.8% difference. Similarly, the extended instructions test shows a 21.2% lead, with scores of 16974 and 13370. The multithread test shows a 39.2% lead, with scores of 30022 and 18252. Physics scores show a 46.3% lead, with 1938 versus 1040. Random string sorting shows a 40.8% lead, with 39643 versus 23451.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads, while the Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clocks differ: 2.20 GHz for the Core 5 210H versus 1.40 GHz for the Core 7 251TE. Boost clocks also differ, with the Core 5 210H at 4.80 GHz and the Core 7 251TE at 5.40 GHz.

The socket is a major differentiator: Intel BGA 1744 for the Core 5 210H versus Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 7 251TE. The codenames differ, with Raptor Lake-H for the Core 5 210H and Bartlett Lake for the Core 7 251TE. The die size is 215 mm² for the Core 7 251TE, while the Core 5 210H's die size is not recorded.

L2 cache differs: 2 MB per core for the Core 5 210H versus 1.25 MB per core for the Core 7 251TE. L3 cache differs significantly: 12 MB shared for the Core 5 210H versus 36 MB shared for the Core 7 251TE. Memory bandwidth is recorded as 89.6 GB/s for the Core 7 251TE, while the Core 5 210H has no recorded value.

ECC memory support is present on the Core 7 251TE but absent on the Core 5 210H. PCIe lanes differ: 8 lanes for the Core 5 210H versus 16 lanes for the Core 7 251TE, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics differ: Iris Xe Graphics 48EU for the Core 5 210H versus UHD Graphics 770 for the Core 7 251TE. The market segment is Mobile for the Core 5 210H and Desktop for the Core 7 251TE.