Intel Core 5 130UL vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct benchmark entries for the Intel Core 5 130UL, meaning its measured performance profile is absent from the recorded results. In contrast, the Intel Core i7-14701E has a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark scores, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The Core 5 130UL sits at the 50th percentile, but without benchmark data, that percentile reflects its general classification rather than a tested result.

Because the head-to-head benchmark table is empty, the only quantitative comparison available comes from the Core i7-14701E's absolute scores and its nearest rival deltas. The Core i7-14701E records 22195 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 9321 in R20 multi-core, and 2237 in R15 multi-core. Single-core results are 3133 in R23, 1315 in R20, and 315 in R15. PassMark tests show 81325 in integer math, 61873 in floating point math, 282939 in data compression, 14862 in data encryption, 18528 in extended instructions, 176 in find prime numbers, 26112 in multithread, 2399 in physics, 29158 in random string sorting, and 4305 in single-thread tests.

The nearest rivals for the Core i7-14701E confirm its competitive position. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 33244, placing the Core i7-14701E 0.1 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33091, putting the Core i7-14701E 0.3 percent ahead. The Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 33089, with the Core i7-14701E leading by 0.4 percent. These deltas are all within one percent, indicating that the Core i7-14701E's average benchmark score of 33206 sits in a tightly packed cluster of similarly performing processors.

The Core 5 130UL has no recorded scores in any test, so no win count can be assigned to either processor. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, confirming that no direct measurements exist to compare the two. The Core i7-14701E's data stands as the only tested reference point, while the Core 5 130UL remains a specification-only entry in the database.

The Core i7-14701E's multi-core Cinebench results show a clear scaling pattern: 2237 in R15, 9321 in R20, and 22195 in R23. These scores indicate strong sustained multi-threaded throughput. The single-core results are similarly consistent, with 315 in R15, 1315 in R20, and 3133 in R23. The PassMark multithread score of 26112 and single-thread score of 4305 align with the Cinebench pattern, showing a processor that excels in both parallel and single-thread workloads.

The Core 5 130UL's 50th percentile ranking suggests mid-pack positioning, but no measured scores exist to validate that classification. The Core i7-14701E's 83rd percentile, backed by concrete test data, places it firmly in the upper tier of desktop processors. The absence of Core 5 130UL benchmarks means any head-to-head numerical comparison is impossible; the database simply lacks the required measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The Core i7-14701E is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark wins across every tested workload. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 indicates strong performance in rendering and CPU-intensive tasks, while the R23 single-core score of 3133 shows competitive per-thread capability. PassMark integer math at 81325 and floating point math at 61873 point to solid arithmetic processing. Data compression at 282939 and encryption at 14862 highlight efficiency in data-handling workflows. Physics at 2399 and random string sorting at 29158 round out a versatile profile.

The Core 5 130UL has no wins in the database because it has no benchmark scores. Its specification sheet suggests a different design intent: 10 cores, 12 threads, a 1.60 GHz base clock, and a 4.70 GHz boost clock. The Core i7-14701E uses 8 cores and 16 threads with a 2.60 GHz base clock and 5.40 GHz boost clock. The Core 5 130UL's higher core count but lower thread count, combined with a 15 W TDP versus the Core i7-14701E's 65 W TDP, indicates a power-conscious configuration. The Core i7-14701E's 33 MB shared L3 cache versus the Core 5 130UL's 12 MB shared L3 cache gives the former a substantial cache advantage.

For scenarios requiring raw multi-threaded performance, the Core i7-14701E's tested scores make it the clear choice. Its 22195 R23 multi-core result and 26112 PassMark multithread score demonstrate sustained throughput under heavy parallel loads. For single-thread responsiveness, the 4305 PassMark single-thread score and 3133 R23 single-core score show strong per-core speed. The Core 5 130UL, lacking any measured results, cannot claim wins in any category. Its lower TDP and higher core count (10 vs 8) suggest it targets efficiency-oriented builds, but without benchmark data, its actual performance remains unquantified.

The nearest rival deltas reinforce the Core i7-14701E's standing. It edges the Ryzen 7 7745HX by 0.3 percent and the Core i7-13650HX by 0.4 percent, while trailing the Ryzen 5 8645HS by 0.1 percent. These near-ties mean the Core i7-14701E trades blows with its closest competitors, but the database shows no such comparisons for the Core 5 130UL.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 130UL have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Core 5 130UL has an empty benchmarks array, zero recorded wins, and an average benchmark score of 0. Its 50th percentile ranking is not supported by any measured test results.

Q: What is the Core i7-14701E's best multi-core benchmark result?

A: The Core i7-14701E scores 22195 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 9321 in R20 multi-core, and 2237 in R15 multi-core. Its PassMark multithread score is 26112.

Q: How does the Core i7-14701E compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i7-14701E's average benchmark score is 33206. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33244) by 0.1 percent, matches the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201) at 0 percent, and leads the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091) by 0.3 percent and the Intel Core i7-13650HX (33089) by 0.4 percent.

Q: What are the single-thread scores for the Core i7-14701E?

A: The Core i7-14701E records 3133 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1315 in R20 single-core, 315 in R15 single-core, and 4305 in PassMark single-thread tests.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Core 5 130UL has 10 cores and 12 threads. The Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Core 5 130UL has more physical cores, while the Core i7-14701E has more threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Core 5 130UL has a 15 W TDP. The Core i7-14701E has a 65 W TDP.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The Core 5 130UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 1.60 GHz for the Core 5 130UL and 2.60 GHz for the Core i7-14701E. Boost clocks are 4.70 GHz for the Core 5 130UL and 5.40 GHz for the Core i7-14701E. TDP is 15 W for the Core 5 130UL and 65 W for the Core i7-14701E.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The Core 5 130UL has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The Core i7-14701E has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. The die size is listed as 257 mm² for the Core i7-14701E, while the Core 5 130UL has no recorded die size.

PCIe support varies. The Core 5 130UL uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Core i7-14701E uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the Core 5 130UL has Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while the Core i7-14701E has UHD Graphics 770. ECC memory support is false for the Core 5 130UL and true for the Core i7-14701E.

Release dates are distinct. The Core 5 130UL was released on 2024-04-07. The Core i7-14701E was released on 2024-06-30. The part number for the Core 5 130UL is unknown, while the Core i7-14701E has the part number Q49FSRNJK. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Both processors share several specifications. Both use Intel Socket 1700, Raptor Lake architecture, a 10 nm process node, Intel as the foundry, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, and dual-channel memory buses. Both are desktop market segments with active production status. Neither has recorded transistors, memory bandwidth, or total L3 cache values.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 130UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation (Raptor Lake-PS). The Core i7-14701E uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, specifically Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh). Both are built on Raptor Lake architecture and a 10 nm process node at Intel.

The core and thread configurations reflect different design philosophies. The Core 5 130UL pairs 10 cores with 12 threads, suggesting a mix of performance and efficiency cores where some cores lack hyper-threading. The Core i7-14701E pairs 8 cores with 16 threads, indicating all cores support hyper-threading. The Core i7-14701E's higher base and boost clocks (2.60 GHz and 5.40 GHz versus 1.60 GHz and 4.70 GHz) point to a higher-performance tuning, supported by its 65 W TDP relative to the Core 5 130UL's 15 W TDP.

Cache hierarchy differs in both L2 and L3. The Core 5 130UL allocates 1.25 MB L2 per core, while the Core i7-14701E allocates 2 MB L2 per core. Shared L3 is 12 MB for the Core 5 130UL and 33 MB for the Core i7-14701E. This 21 MB difference in shared L3 gives the Core i7-14701E a substantial advantage for workloads that benefit from large, fast caches.

PCIe capabilities diverge sharply. The Core 5 130UL supports Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes. The Core i7-14701E supports Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. This doubles both the lane count and the PCIe generation for the Core i7-14701E, enabling higher bandwidth for discrete GPUs and NVMe storage. Integrated graphics also differ: Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on the Core 5 130UL versus UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i7-14701E, though no benchmark scores exist to compare their graphics performance.

ECC memory support is present on the Core i7-14701E but absent on the Core 5 130UL. This makes the Core i7-14701E suitable for memory-error-sensitive workloads such as data processing and server-like applications. The Core 5 130UL's lower TDP and higher core count suggest a design focused on efficiency, while the Core i7-14701E's higher clocks, larger cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support indicate a performance-oriented part. The Core i7-14701E's die size of 257 mm² is recorded, while the Core 5 130UL's die size is not listed. Both processors share the same L1 cache per core (80 KB), socket, memory support, and fabrication node.