Intel Core 5 130UL vs Intel Core 5 320 Comparison

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 130UL and Intel Core 5 320 represent two distinct approaches to low-power computing. The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between them, so the analysis relies on the recorded performance metrics of the Core 5 320 and the architectural profile of the Core 5 130UL.

The Core 5 320 holds a 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18023. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 at 17994 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core 5 120U at 17898 (0.7% lower), the Intel Core i5-1334U at 18154 (0.7% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT at 17891 (0.7% lower). This places the Core 5 320 in a tight performance cluster where it effectively matches or slightly edges out several established desktop and mobile processors.

The Core 5 130UL, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, no average score, and a 50th percentile ranking. It sits in the middle of the database distribution, but without measured data, its actual performance cannot be quantified. The Core 5 320 is the only option with verified benchmark results.

For workloads that demand measured performance, the Core 5 320 is the only choice with data to support a decision. It delivers competitive multi-core and single-core results across Cinebench and Passmark tests. The Core 5 130UL offers a higher core count, more threads, and a larger L3 cache, but the database contains no evidence of how those specifications translate into real-world performance. Users requiring verified throughput should select the Core 5 320.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 320 wins in measured performance across every benchmark category in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6197 and single-core score of 1926 demonstrate balanced capability. Passmark integer math reaches 32323, floating point math reaches 42440, and extended instructions score 13262. Data compression hits 148779, while data encryption reaches 10984. The processor also delivers a multi-thread score of 15450 and a single-thread score of 4045.

The Core 5 320 benefits from a 3 nm process node, which suggests higher transistor density and efficiency compared to the 10 nm node of the Core 5 130UL. Its integrated graphics, Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, represent a newer generation than the Iris Xe Graphics 80EU found in the Core 5 130UL. The Core 5 320 also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is absent from the Core 5 130UL's memory support list.

The Core 5 130UL wins on paper in several architectural dimensions. It has 10 cores and 12 threads versus 6 cores and 6 threads for the Core 5 320. Its 12 MB shared L3 cache doubles the 6 MB shared L3 of the Core 5 320. It supports dual-channel memory, while the Core 5 320 is single-channel. It also offers 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes on the CPU versus 6 lanes for the Core 5 320. However, these advantages remain unverified in benchmark terms.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying designs. The Core 5 130UL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. It belongs to the Core 5 generation of Raptor Lake-PS processors. The Core 5 320 uses the Wildcat Lake codename with a 3 nm process node, also fabricated by Intel, and belongs to the Core 5 generation of Wildcat Lake processors.

Core and thread counts differ sharply. The Core 5 130UL provides 10 cores and 12 threads, suggesting a hybrid configuration with performance and efficiency cores. The Core 5 320 provides 6 cores and 6 threads, indicating a simpler layout without hyper-threading. Base clocks are close: 1.60 GHz for the Core 5 130UL versus 1.50 GHz for the Core 5 320. Boost clocks are similarly near: 4.70 GHz versus 4.60 GHz.

Cache structures differ in both size and organization. The Core 5 130UL has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 320 has 192 KB of L1 cache total, 2.5 MB of L2 cache total, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The per-core L1 and L2 figures for the Core 5 320 are not specified in the database, but the total cache capacities are substantially lower.

Memory support marks a major division. The Core 5 130UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus. The Core 5 320 supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Core 5 130UL has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

Socket and packaging differ completely. The Core 5 130UL uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop processor. The Core 5 320 uses Intel BGA 1516 and is classified as mobile. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Core 5 130UL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the CPU, while the Core 5 320 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes on the CPU.

Integrated graphics represent two generations. The Core 5 130UL includes Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. The Core 5 320 includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 130UL has 10 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The Core 5 130UL is built on a 10 nm process. The Core 5 320 is built on a 3 nm process. Both are fabricated by Intel.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 5 130UL supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus. The Core 5 320 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and a recorded bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Core 5 320?

A: The Core 5 320 has an average benchmark score of 18023 and ranks in the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Core 5 130UL have any recorded benchmark data?

A: No. The database contains no benchmark scores for the Core 5 130UL, no average score, and no nearest rival comparisons. Its percentile ranking is 50.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Core 5 320?

A: The launch MSRP is $340.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database includes no head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Core 5 130UL and the Core 5 320. The wins count for each processor is zero. However, the Core 5 320 has a full set of standalone benchmark results that provide a reference point for its measured performance.

Cinebench R15 multi-core scoring places the Core 5 320 at 1054, while single-core reaches 276. Cinebench R20 multi-core improves to 5462 with single-core at 771. Cinebench R23 multi-core delivers 6197 and single-core delivers 1926. These results show that the Core 5 320 scales reasonably well from R15 to R23, with the multi-core figures increasing consistently.

Passmark tests reveal specific workload characteristics. Integer math scores 32323, which reflects strong arithmetic throughput. Floating point math scores 42440, indicating solid scientific computing capability. Extended instructions reach 13262, useful for vectorized and SIMD workloads. Data compression scores 148779, while data encryption scores 10984, suggesting that compression tasks benefit from the processor's architecture more than encryption tasks do.

The multi-thread score of 15450 and single-thread score of 4045 confirm that the Core 5 320 handles both parallel and serial workloads competently. Physics calculations score 1221, random string sorting scores 18038, and prime number finding scores 110. The prime number score is notably low compared to other integer workloads, which may indicate that the processor's architecture prioritizes other instruction patterns.

For the Core 5 130UL, no comparable data exists. The database records no Cinebench scores, no Passmark scores, and no average benchmark score. The 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all CPUs, but this ranking appears to be based on incomplete data. Without measured results, the Core 5 130UL cannot be compared numerically to the Core 5 320 or any other processor in the database.

The nearest rivals for the Core 5 320 provide additional context. The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 averages 17994, just 0.2% below the Core 5 320. The Intel Core 5 120U averages 17898, 0.7% lower. The Intel Core i5-1334U averages 18154, 0.7% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT averages 17891, 0.7% lower. This clustering shows that the Core 5 320 performs nearly identically to a range of established processors from both Intel and AMD, spanning multiple generations and market segments.

Specification Differences

The Core 5 130UL and Core 5 320 differ in the following recorded specifications:

Cores: Core 5 130UL has 10 cores. Core 5 320 has 6 cores.

Threads: Core 5 130UL has 12 threads. Core 5 320 has 6 threads.

Base clock: Core 5 130UL runs at 1.60 GHz. Core 5 320 runs at 1.50 GHz.

Boost clock: Core 5 130UL boosts to 4.70 GHz. Core 5 320 boosts to 4.60 GHz.

TDP: Both processors have a TDP of 15.

Socket: Core 5 130UL uses Intel Socket 1700. Core 5 320 uses Intel BGA 1516.

Architecture: Core 5 130UL uses Raptor Lake. Core 5 320 has no recorded architecture name.

Codename: Core 5 130UL uses Raptor Lake-PS. Core 5 320 uses Wildcat Lake.

Process node: Core 5 130UL is built on 10 nm. Core 5 320 is built on 3 nm.

L1 cache: Core 5 130UL has 80 KB per core. Core 5 320 has 192 KB total.

L2 cache: Core 5 130UL has 1.25 MB per core. Core 5 320 has 2.5 MB total.

L3 cache: Core 5 130UL has 12 MB shared. Core 5 320 has 6 MB shared.

Memory support: Core 5 130UL supports DDR4 and DDR5. Core 5 320 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Memory bus: Core 5 130UL is dual-channel. Core 5 320 is single-channel.

Memory bandwidth: Core 5 130UL has no recorded figure. Core 5 320 has 59.7 GB/s.

PCIe: Core 5 130UL provides Gen 4, 8 lanes on the CPU. Core 5 320 provides Gen 4, 6 lanes on the CPU.

Integrated graphics: Core 5 130UL includes Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. Core 5 320 includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

Market segment: Core 5 130UL is desktop. Core 5 320 is mobile.

Part number: Core 5 130UL is unknown. Core 5 320 is SAE3H.

Release date: Core 5 130UL released on 2024-04-07. Core 5 320 released on 2026-04-15.

Launch MSRP: Core 5 130UL has no recorded MSRP. Core 5 320 has a launch MSRP of $340.

Benchmark data: Core 5 130UL has no benchmarks. Core 5 320 has 17 recorded benchmark results.

Average benchmark score: Core 5 130UL has 0. Core 5 320 has 18023.

Percentile ranking: Core 5 130UL ranks in the 50th percentile. Core 5 320 ranks in the 72nd percentile.

ECC memory support: Neither processor supports ECC memory.

Unlocked multiplier: Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.