Intel Core 5 130HL vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a stark contrast between these two desktop processors. The Intel Core 5 130HL is a 12-core, 16-thread part based on Raptor Lake, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 9 273PQE, however, is a substantially more capable part. It is also a 12-core design but supports 24 threads, runs at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz, and falls into the 93rd percentile. The benchmark data confirms that the Core 9 273PQE is the dominant processor in every measurable category. For any workload that prioritizes raw compute throughput, high thread counts, or maximum clock speeds, the Core 9 273PQE is the clear selection. The Core 5 130HL, with its lower clocks and fewer threads, is positioned for systems where the processor is not the primary performance focus, though the data does not include any benchmark scores for it, making it impossible to quantify its absolute performance.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results for the Intel Core 9 273PQE establish its superiority across all tested dimensions. The Core 5 130HL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its specific performance profile cannot be compared numerically. The Core 9 273PQE delivers a multi-thread score of 39190 in Cinebench R23 and a single-thread score of 5532 in the same test. These figures indicate a processor that excels in both heavily threaded rendering workloads and lightly threaded application responsiveness. Its Passmark results further reinforce this, with a multithread score of 46107 and a single-thread score of 4573. The Core 5 130HL, by contrast, offers a lower base clock and a lower boost clock, suggesting it will produce fewer instructions per unit time in all scenarios. The Core 9 273PQE also features a larger L3 cache of 36 MB shared, compared to the 18 MB shared on the Core 5 130HL, which often benefits workloads with large working sets. The Core 9 273PQE is the winner in every category where data exists; the Core 5 130HL has no recorded wins.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in their underlying architecture. The Intel Core 5 130HL is built on Raptor Lake, with the codename Raptor Lake-PS, and is part of the Core 5 generation. The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation. Both are fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. The core counts are identical at 12, but the thread counts diverge: the Core 5 130HL supports 16 threads, while the Core 9 273PQE supports 24 threads, indicating a different arrangement of physical and logical cores. The cache hierarchy is similar at the L1 and L2 levels, with 80 KB per core and 2 MB per core respectively, but the L3 cache doubles from 18 MB shared on the Core 5 130HL to 36 MB shared on the Core 9 273PQE. The Core 9 273PQE also operates at significantly higher clocks, with a 3.40 GHz base and 5.90 GHz boost, versus the 2.60 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost of the Core 5 130HL. The power envelope is also distinct, with the Core 5 130HL rated at 45 W TDP and the Core 9 273PQE at 125 W TDP.

Memory support is a shared trait: both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The Core 9 273PQE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while no such figure is recorded for the Core 5 130HL. The Core 9 273PQE supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Core 5 130HL. PCIe capabilities also differ. The Core 5 130HL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the Core 9 273PQE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ as well, with the Core 5 130HL using Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and the Core 9 273PQE using UHD Graphics 770. Both processors use the Intel Socket 1700 and have locked multipliers. The Core 9 273PQE has a launch MSRP of $589 and a part number of SA4Q9. The release dates in the database are 2024-04-07 for the Core 5 130HL and 2026-03-08 for the Core 9 273PQE.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher thread count?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE supports 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 130HL supports 16 threads. Both have 12 physical cores.

Q: What are the boost clock frequencies for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The Intel Core 5 130HL has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How does the L3 cache compare between the two?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 130HL has 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The Core 9 273PQE additionally supports ECC memory, which the Core 5 130HL does not.

Q: What is the TDP rating for each?

A: The Intel Core 5 130HL is rated at 45 W TDP. The Intel Core 9 273PQE is rated at 125 W TDP.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has an average benchmark score of 66099 and sits at the 93rd percentile. The Intel Core 5 130HL has no recorded benchmark scores and is at the 50th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head comparison in the database contains no direct benchmark entries, but the recorded scores for the Intel Core 9 273PQE provide a comprehensive performance profile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 places this processor well above typical desktop parts, while the single-core score of 5532 indicates strong per-thread performance. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 16459 and the single-core score is 2323. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multi-core score of 3950 and a single-core score of 557. These results demonstrate consistent scaling across different versions of the rendering benchmark.

The Passmark suite reveals specific strengths. The integer math score is 164629, while floating point math reaches 125546. Data compression scores 585752, and data encryption scores 29636. Extended instructions produce a score of 38743. The processor achieves 46107 in the multithread test and 4573 in the single-thread test. Physics simulation scores 2754, and random string sorting scores 53167. The find prime numbers test yields 198. Since the Intel Core 5 130HL has no corresponding benchmark data, the Core 9 273PQE is unopposed in all of these metrics.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Core 9 273PQE holds a narrow edge over some and a slight deficit against others. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus by 0.1 percent, with that rival averaging 66159. It leads the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D by 0.3 percent, which averages 65914. It is 1.1 percent behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, which averages 66855, and 1.2 percent behind the AMD EPYC 4465P, which averages 66925. This places the Core 9 273PQE in a tight competitive cluster where the score differences are minimal, within a range of approximately 1.2 percent. For the Core 5 130HL, no such rival data exists, leaving its competitive positioning undefined in the database.