Intel Core 3 N350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 3 N350 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 represent divergent approaches to mobile computing, and the recorded data shows a stark contrast in their performance profiles. The most immediate observation is that the database contains a complete benchmark suite for the Intel part, while the Qualcomm processor has no recorded benchmark scores in the database at this time. This absence of data for the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 means that a direct numerical comparison across identical workloads is not possible from the available measurements.

What the data does provide is a detailed picture of the Intel Core 3 N350's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the N350 scores 6274 points in the multicore test and 885 points in the singlecore test. The Cinebench R20 results show 2635 points multicore and 371 points singlecore, while the older Cinebench R15 test yields 632 points multicore and 89 points singlecore. These scores place the N350 at the 66th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 9903.

The PassMark suite offers additional granularity. The N350 delivers 80444 in data compression, 5693 in data encryption, 3981 in extended instructions, and 20 in finding prime numbers. Floating point math scores 17781, integer math scores 27669, and multithreaded performance scores 7382. Physics processing records 446, random string sorting records 10102, and single-thread performance scores 1974.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the N350's standing. The Intel Core i7-3770 has an average score of 9706, which is 2% lower than the N350's average of 9903. The Intel Core i5-1035G1 scores 9684 on average, 2.3% below the N350. On the higher end, the AMD EPYC 7F52 averages 10159, which is 2.5% above the N350, and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 averages 10230, 3.2% above. These deltas are tight, indicating that the N350 sits in a competitive cluster of processors from different generations and market positions.

The Snapdragon X1E-80-100, by contrast, has a percentile ranking of 50 among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the absence of recorded test results. Without measured scores, no head-to-head wins can be assigned to either processor. The wins counter shows 0 for both parts, confirming that the database has not recorded any comparative benchmark outcomes between these two specific processors.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Core 3 N350 is the only one of these two processors with measurable performance data in the database. Its 66th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates that it outperforms a majority of recorded processors, despite its modest specifications. The nearest rivals, all within a 3.2% band of the N350's average score, reinforce that it delivers competitive throughput for its class.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 cannot be evaluated on the same terms because no benchmark scores exist for it in the database. Its 50th percentile placeholder and zero average score do not reflect actual performance; they simply mark the absence of measurements. Anyone seeking a processor with verified performance records should consider the Intel part, as the database contains a full suite of results across Cinebench versions and PassMark workloads.

From a capability standpoint, the N350's 8 cores and 8 threads with a boost clock of 3.90 GHz and a 7 W TDP indicate an efficient design suited for sustained mobile workloads. The Snapdragon offers 12 cores and 12 threads with a higher boost clock of 4.00 GHz and a 35 W TDP, but without recorded scores, its real-world performance remains unquantified in this database. The verdict from the recorded data is that the Intel Core 3 N350 is the verified performer, while the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 awaits benchmark validation.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two processors is pronounced. The Intel Core 3 N350 uses the Twin Lake architecture, part of the Core 3 generation built on the Alder Lake-N family, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 uses the Oryon codename within the Snapdragon X (Elite) generation, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference, 10 nm versus 4 nm, is significant and indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology for the Qualcomm part.

Core counts differ substantially. The N350 has 8 cores and 8 threads, meaning no simultaneous multithreading. The Snapdragon has 12 cores and 12 threads, also without multithreading but with a higher physical core count. Base clocks are far apart: the N350 runs at 0.10 GHz base with a 3.90 GHz boost, while the Snapdragon runs at 3.40 GHz base with a 4.00 GHz boost. The Snapdragon's base clock is dramatically higher, suggesting it maintains higher frequencies under load.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The Intel part features 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm part has 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The L2 allocation is particularly notable, with the Snapdragon providing six times the L2 capacity in its per-module configuration.

Memory support reflects different design targets. The N350 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory over a single-channel bus, delivering 38.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Snapdragon supports only LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering 135.2 GB/s, which is roughly 3.5 times the bandwidth of the Intel part. PCIe connectivity also differs: the N350 uses Gen 3 with 9 CPU lanes, while the Snapdragon uses Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics are present on both. The Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Qualcomm part uses Adreno X1-85. Neither processor supports ECC memory. Both are active production parts for the mobile segment. The N350 was released on 2025-01-06, while the Snapdragon was released on 2024-04-23. The N350 carries the part number SRPNS, and the Snapdragon carries part number X1E80100. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The N350 uses an Intel BGA 1264 socket, while the Snapdragon uses a Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 N350 has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between these two processors?

A: The Intel Core 3 N350 has a TDP of 7 W, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has a TDP of 35 W.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s over a dual-channel LPDDR5X bus, compared to the Intel Core 3 N350's 38.4 GB/s over a single-channel bus supporting DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 N350 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The N350 averages 9903 in benchmark scores. The Intel Core i7-3770 scores 9706, 2% lower; the Intel Core i5-1035G1 scores 9684, 2.3% lower; the AMD EPYC 7F52 scores 10159, 2.5% higher; and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 scores 10230, 3.2% higher.

Q: What process nodes are used for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 N350 uses a 10 nm process at Intel, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Does the database contain any benchmark scores for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100?

A: The database has no recorded benchmark scores for the Snapdragon X1E-80-100. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile ranking is 50, which reflects the absence of measured data rather than actual performance.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 N350 wins in the category of verified performance data. The database contains 17 recorded benchmark scores for this processor, covering Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both multicore and singlecore tests, plus a full PassMark suite including data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, multithreading, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. This comprehensive dataset allows for direct comparison against its nearest rivals, where it sits within 2% to 3.2% of four different processors spanning desktop, mobile, and server segments.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 wins in raw specification counts. It offers 12 cores versus 8, a 3.40 GHz base clock versus 0.10 GHz, a 4.00 GHz boost clock versus 3.90 GHz, 288 KB of L1 cache per core versus 96 KB, 12 MB of L2 per module versus 2 MB shared, and 135.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth versus 38.4 GB/s. It also uses a smaller 4 nm process node versus 10 nm, supports PCIe Gen 4 versus Gen 3, and has 12 CPU lanes versus 9.

For users prioritizing measured outcomes, the Intel part is the clear choice from the database's perspective. Its 66th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates that it outperforms the majority of processors with recorded data. The tight clustering of its nearest rivals, all within a 3.2% performance band, shows that the N350 delivers consistent throughput across varied workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 7382 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 6274 provide concrete reference points for expected performance.

For users prioritizing architectural specifications, the Snapdragon appears stronger on paper. The higher core count, dramatically higher base clock, larger cache allocations, wider memory bus, and more advanced process node suggest a design with greater theoretical headroom. The dual-channel memory interface and Gen 4 PCIe support indicate a platform built for higher data throughput. However, without benchmark scores in the database, these specifications cannot be validated against actual workload performance.

The recorded data shows that the Intel Core 3 N350 is the only processor in this comparison with demonstrated benchmark results, placing it at the 66th percentile of all CPUs. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 remains an unmeasured quantity, with its specification sheet suggesting capability but its benchmark results still pending in the database.