Intel Core 3 N350 vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive sweep for the Intel Core i5-14401E across every shared benchmark in the database. The head-to-head table lists six cinebench tests, and the Core i5-14401E wins all six with a uniform delta of -65.5% relative to the Core 3 N350. This consistency is notable: the performance gap is not concentrated in one type of workload but appears across both single-core and multi-core tests.

In Cinebench R15, the Core i5-14401E scores 1830 in multicore against 632 for the Core 3 N350. The single-core result is 258 versus 89. Both deltas sit at -65.5%, meaning the Core i5-14401E delivers roughly three times the performance in each case. The same ratio holds in Cinebench R20, where the Core i5-14401E posts 7627 multicore and 1076 single-core, while the Core 3 N350 manages 2635 and 371. Cinebench R23 repeats the pattern with 18161 versus 6274 in multicore and 2564 versus 885 in single-core.

The uniformity of the delta across all six tests suggests the advantage comes from a fundamental architectural and power difference rather than a workload-specific strength. Every generation of the cinebench suite scales similarly, which points to a consistent per-thread and per-core advantage for the Core i5-14401E.

The Core 3 N350 does hold some ground in other database entries. Its Passmark suite results include a data compression score of 80444, a floating point math score of 17781, and an integer math score of 27669. These are not directly comparable to the Core i5-14401E because the database does not list Passmark results for that processor, so the comparison set is limited to cinebench. Within that set, the Core 3 N350 wins zero of six tests.

The average benchmark score in the database tells a broader story. The Core 3 N350 has an average benchmark score of 9903, placing it in the 66th percentile of all CPUs. The Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253, placing it in the 60th percentile. These figures appear contradictory at first glance, since the Core 3 N350 shows a higher percentile despite losing every head-to-head cinebench test. The explanation lies in the different benchmark portfolios: the Core 3 N350 has many Passmark results recorded, while the Core i5-14401E only has cinebench scores. The neighbor comparisons reinforce this. The Core 3 N350 sits near the Intel Core i7-3770 (delta 2%), the Intel Core i5-1035G1 (delta 2.3%), the AMD EPYC 7F52 (delta -2.5%), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 (delta -3.2%). The Core i5-14401E sits near the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 (delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i7-11700B (delta 0.2%), the Intel Core i9-10850K (delta 0.2%), and the Intel Core i5-13400T (delta 0.8%). These are two very different performance neighborhoods.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14401E is the stronger processor for cinebench-style rendering workloads by a wide margin. The six head-to-head results show a consistent 65.5% deficit for the Core 3 N350, which translates to the Core i5-14401E scoring roughly 2.9 times higher in every test. For anyone selecting a CPU for multi-threaded or single-threaded rendering tasks, the Core i5-14401E is the clear choice based on these measurements.

The Core 3 N350, however, occupies a different market segment. Its 7 watt TDP and mobile socket placement indicate a low-power design, while the Core i5-14401E is a desktop processor with a 65 watt TDP. The average benchmark score for the Core 3 N350 is higher because the database includes a larger set of tests for it, and its percentile ranking is also higher at 66 versus 60. This does not change the head-to-head outcome, but it does show that the Core 3 N350 is competitive within its own class of CPUs. The nearest rivals for the Core 3 N350 include the Intel Core i7-3770 and the Intel Core i5-1035G1, both older or lower-power parts. The nearest rivals for the Core i5-14401E include the Intel Core i9-10850K and the Intel Core i5-13400T, which are higher-end desktop chips.

The choice depends on the workload and platform. The Core i5-14401E wins every recorded comparison. The Core 3 N350 offers a far lower power envelope and a smaller physical footprint suited to mobile systems.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel architectures. The Core 3 N350 uses the Twin Lake architecture, also listed as Core 3 from the Alder Lake-N generation. The Core i5-14401E uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh from the Core 14th Gen series. Both are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel, so the manufacturing process is identical. The die size differs: the Core i5-14401E has a die size of 215 mm², while the database does not list a die size for the Core 3 N350.

Core and thread counts diverge significantly. The Core 3 N350 has 8 cores and 8 threads, meaning no simultaneous multithreading. The Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads, meaning each core supports two threads. This explains part of the multi-core performance gap: the Core i5-14401E can execute 12 threads concurrently versus 8 for the Core 3 N350, despite having fewer physical cores.

Clock speeds also favor the Core i5-14401E. The base clock is 2.50 GHz versus 0.10 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.70 GHz versus 3.90 GHz. The extremely low base clock of the Core 3 N350 is characteristic of a low-power mobile part, likely designed for burst workloads rather than sustained heavy lifting. The boost clock difference of 0.80 GHz contributes to the single-core gap in the cinebench results.

Cache layouts are completely different. The Core 3 N350 has 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Core i5-14401E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The total L2 capacity for the Core i5-14401E across 6 cores is 7.5 MB, which is larger than the 2 MB shared pool on the Core 3 N350. The L3 advantage is substantial: 20 MB versus 6 MB. This larger cache likely helps the Core i5-14401E in repeated workloads and data-heavy tasks.

Memory support shows a split. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5. The Core 3 N350 adds LPDDR5 support, which aligns with its mobile positioning. The memory bus differs: the Core 3 N350 is single-channel while the Core i5-14401E is dual-channel. The database lists a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s for the Core 3 N350 but does not list a figure for the Core i5-14401E. ECC memory support also differs: the Core 3 N350 does not support ECC, while the Core i5-14401E does.

PCIe connectivity favors the Core i5-14401E. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Core 3 N350 supports PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes. The newer PCIe generation and higher lane count give the desktop part more expansion headroom.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 3 N350 uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core i5-14401E uses UHD Graphics 730. The socket types are incompatible: the Core 3 N350 uses Intel BGA 1264, a soldered mobile socket, and the Core i5-14401E uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 3 N350 has 8 cores, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores. However, the Core i5-14401E has 12 threads due to simultaneous multithreading, versus 8 threads for the Core 3 N350.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23?

A: In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core i5-14401E scores 18161 versus 6274 for the Core 3 N350, a delta of -65.5% from the Core 3 N350's perspective. Single-core shows 2564 versus 885, also -65.5%.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5. The Core 3 N350 additionally supports LPDDR5. The Core i5-14401E supports ECC memory, while the Core 3 N350 does not.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: The Core 3 N350 has a TDP of 7 watts. The Core i5-14401E has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Core 3 N350 has an average benchmark score of 9903, compared to 5253 for the Core i5-14401E. The Core 3 N350 also has a higher percentile ranking at 66 versus 60.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The Core 3 N350 uses Intel BGA 1264, a mobile socket. The Core i5-14401E uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins every benchmark recorded in the head-to-head comparison. The six cinebench tests cover both single-core and multi-core workloads across three versions of the suite. The multi-core wins in Cinebench R15 (1830 versus 632), R20 (7627 versus 2635), and R23 (18161 versus 6274) indicate a strong advantage in rendering tasks that scale with thread count and sustained clock speed. The single-core wins in R15 (258 versus 89), R20 (1076 versus 371), and R23 (2564 versus 885) show that the advantage persists even in lightly threaded workloads. The Core i5-14401E also has a much higher boost clock at 4.70 GHz versus 3.90 GHz, a larger L3 cache at 20 MB versus 6 MB, and dual-channel memory support, all of which contribute to its benchmark dominance.

The Intel Core 3 N350 does not win any of the recorded head-to-head tests, but it does hold advantages in specific specification areas. Its 7 watt TDP makes it suitable for fanless or low-power mobile designs. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a newer graphics unit than the UHD Graphics 730 on the Core i5-14401E. The Core 3 N350 also supports LPDDR5 memory, which is not listed for the Core i5-14401E. Its 8 physical cores exceed the 6 physical cores of the Core i5-14401E, though the Core i5-14401E compensates with 12 threads. The average benchmark score of 9903 for the Core 3 N350 is higher than the 5253 for the Core i5-14401E, and its percentile ranking of 66 exceeds the Core i5-14401E's 60, indicating that within the broader database it competes with a different set of processors.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. Core count: 8 for the Core 3 N350 versus 6 for the Core i5-14401E. Thread count: 8 versus 12. Base clock: 0.10 GHz versus 2.50 GHz. Boost clock: 3.90 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. TDP: 7 watts versus 65 watts. Socket: Intel BGA 1264 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture: Twin Lake versus Raptor Lake. Process node: both 10 nm. Die size: no recorded value for the Core 3 N350 versus 215 mm² for the Core i5-14401E.

Cache differences are pronounced. L1 cache: 96 KB per core for the Core 3 N350 versus 80 KB per core for the Core i5-14401E. L2 cache: 2 MB shared for the Core 3 N350 versus 1.25 MB per core for the Core i5-14401E. L3 cache: 6 MB shared versus 20 MB shared. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 for the Core 3 N350 versus DDR4 and DDR5 for the Core i5-14401E. Memory bus: single-channel versus dual-channel. Memory bandwidth: 38.4 GB/s for the Core 3 N350, no recorded value for the Core i5-14401E. ECC memory: not supported versus supported.

PCIe connectivity: Gen 3 with 9 lanes for the Core 3 N350 versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Core i5-14401E. Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 770 versus UHD Graphics 730. Market segment: Mobile versus Desktop. Release date: 2025-01-06 for the Core 3 N350 versus 2024-06-30 for the Core i5-14401E. Both processors are active in production. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP. Both have locked multipliers. The Core 3 N350 has part number SRPNS, and the Core i5-14401E has part number Q49JSRNJS.