Intel Core 3 304 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 304 compare to the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 in core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads. The Snapdragon has more than three times the core count, but the Core 3 304 relies on a higher boost clock of 4.30 GHz versus 4.70 GHz for the Snapdragon.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has a base clock of 4.00 GHz, which is substantially higher than the Intel Core 3 304's base clock of 1.50 GHz. The Snapdragon's base clock exceeds the Intel chip's base by 2.50 GHz.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth capabilities of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a single-channel bus and a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 supports LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s, which is roughly 2.5 times higher than the Intel part.

Q: What integrated graphics do these processors use?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe), while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 uses the Adreno X2-90. The Intel chip's graphics core is part of the Wildcat Lake generation, while the Snapdragon's GPU is integrated into the Glymur die.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 has an average benchmark score of 13745 and falls in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking, so direct performance comparisons rely on the Intel chip's recorded results only.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for each chip?

A: Both processors are built on a 3 nm process node. The Intel Core 3 304 uses Intel's own foundry, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 uses TSMC as its foundry.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in their fundamental design. The Intel Core 3 304, codenamed Wildcat Lake, is a 5-core, 5-thread part with no multithreading, meaning each core handles a single thread. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100, codenamed Glymur, is an 18-core, 18-thread design, also without multithreading, but with 13 more physical cores. This core-count gap is the single biggest architectural differentiator between the two.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The Intel part has a 192 KB L1 cache, a 2.5 MB L2 cache, and a 6 MB shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm part lists a 288 KB L1 cache per core and a 16 MB L2 cache per module, with no L3 cache specified. The Snapdragon's per-core L1 allocation is 96 KB larger than the Intel chip's total L1, and its per-module L2 is 13.5 MB larger than the Intel L2, though the Intel design includes a dedicated shared L3 that the Snapdragon does not list.

Memory architecture separates the two as well. The Intel Core 3 304 uses a single-channel memory bus with DDR5 and LPDDR5X support, delivering 59.7 GB/s. The Snapdragon X2E-88-100 uses a dual-channel LPDDR5X bus delivering 152.4 GB/s, a 92.7 GB/s advantage. The Snapdragon also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes.

The process node is identical at 3 nm, but the foundries differ: Intel fabricates its chip in-house, while TSMC fabricates the Snapdragon. The Snapdragon die size is recorded at 220 mm²; no die size is listed for the Intel part. The Snapdragon's base clock of 4.00 GHz is well above the Intel's 1.50 GHz, though the boost clocks are closer at 4.70 GHz versus 4.30 GHz. The Intel part has a TDP of 15 watts; the Snapdragon has no TDP listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark records between the Intel Core 3 304 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100. The Snapdragon has no recorded benchmark scores at all, so all quantitative comparisons must reference the Intel chip's results and its nearest rivals.

The Intel Core 3 304 delivers an average benchmark score of 13745, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest recorded rival is the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX with an average score of 13786, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the Intel chip trails that workstation part by a negligible margin. Against the Intel Core i7-8750H, the Core 3 304 is behind by 0.9% (13868 vs. 13745). The Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13594, which is 1.1% lower than the Core 3 304, making it the only rival the Intel chip leads in this group. The AMD EPYC 7443 scores 13936, a 1.4% advantage over the Core 3 304.

Within the Intel part's own benchmark suite, the strongest results appear in PassMark single-thread testing, where the chip scores 3614 in both the "single_thread" and "singlethread" entries. The Cinebench R20 multicore score is 4160 and the single-core score is 587. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 5263 and the single-core score is 1765. The PassMark data compression score is 114775, while data encryption reaches 8501 and extended instructions hit 9686. Floating point math scores 29722 and integer math scores 24640. The multithread score is 11625, physics is 868, and random string sorting is 13659. The find prime numbers result is 68.

Because the Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has no benchmark entries, the database cannot show which processor wins a single recorded test. The Intel chip's 68th percentile ranking and 13745 average score stand as the only performance reference points available.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear performance verdict for the Intel Core 3 304, since it is the only one of the two with any benchmark results. It scores 13745 on average and sits in the 68th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival comparisons showing a spread of only 1.4% against the AMD EPYC 7443 and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core 5 120UL. This indicates the Intel part is a solid mid-pack mobile processor with competitive single-thread and multicore results.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 cannot be validated through benchmark data. Its 18-core configuration, 4.70 GHz boost clock, and 152.4 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest strong theoretical capabilities, but the database contains no scores to confirm actual performance. The 50th percentile ranking and 0 average score reflect the absence of measurements, not a measured performance level.

For users requiring measured performance data, the Intel Core 3 304 is the only option with verified results. The Snapdragon's dual-channel memory and higher core count could indicate advantages in memory-heavy or highly parallel workloads, but no benchmark evidence supports such claims. The Intel chip's 15-watt TDP and 4.30 GHz boost clock make it a plausible choice for power-conscious mobile designs, while the Snapdragon's unlisted TDP leaves its power profile undefined.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 3 304 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 5 | 18 |

| Threads | 5 | 18 |

| Base clock | 1.50 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | Not listed |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | Qualcomm BGA 2343 |

| Codename | Wildcat Lake | Glymur |

| Generation | Core 3 (Wildcat Lake) | Snapdragon X2 (Elite) |

| Process node | 3 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die size | Not listed | 220 mm² |

| L1 cache | 192 KB | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 16 MB (per module) |

| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | Not listed |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 152.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) | Adreno X2-90 |

| Part number | SAE3K | X2E88100 |

| Release date | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-05 |

| Launch MSRP | $309 | Not listed |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 304 wins in the only category with measured outcomes: verified benchmark performance. Its 13745 average score, 68th percentile ranking, and 3614 PassMark single-thread result give it a documented performance profile. It also carries a recorded 15-watt TDP, which supports deployment in lower-power mobile designs, and it has a launch MSRP of $309, providing a fixed reference point for market positioning. The 6 MB shared L3 cache and Intel Xe3 Graphics give it a complete package for everyday mobile workloads.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 wins on paper in raw architectural specifications. It has 13 more cores, a 0.40 GHz higher boost clock, a 2.50 GHz higher base clock, and more than double the memory bandwidth at 152.4 GB/s versus 59.7 GB/s. Its dual-channel memory bus, PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes, and larger per-module L2 cache of 16 MB all point to advantages in data-intensive or massively parallel tasks, assuming software can utilize the 18 cores. The 220 mm² die and TSMC fabrication also distinguish it physically from the Intel part.

The decisive factor in the database is the absence of Snapdragon benchmark results. Until measurements exist, the Intel Core 3 304 holds the only confirmed performance position, while the Snapdragon remains an unverified specification sheet. Use-case selection therefore hinges on whether the user prioritizes recorded performance data or architectural headroom. The Intel chip delivers measurable results in the mid-range mobile segment, while the Snapdragon offers a higher-specification foundation that the database has not yet validated.