Intel Core 3 304 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Core 3 304 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100. The Intel Core 3 304 has a full set of recorded benchmark scores, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database at this time. This means every performance comparison must rely on the Intel part's absolute scores and its position relative to other CPUs in the database, rather than a direct matchup.

The Intel Core 3 304 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5263 and a single-core score of 1765. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 4160 and the single-core result is 587. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 849 multi-core and 264 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 11625, a single-thread score of 3614, integer math at 24640, floating point math at 29722, data compression at 114775, data encryption at 8501, extended instructions at 9686, find prime numbers at 68, physics at 868, and random string sorting at 13659.

The Intel Core 3 304 sits at the 68th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 13745. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX with an average score of 13786, which is 0.3% higher, and the Intel Core i7-8750H with an average score of 13868, which is 0.9% higher. On the other side, the Intel Core 5 120UL trails with an average score of 13594, putting the Core 3 304 1.1% ahead, and the AMD EPYC 7443 scores 13936, which is 1.4% higher than the Core 3 304.

Because the Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has no recorded benchmarks and no nearest rivals listed, the data cannot establish any performance delta between the two processors. The comparison must instead focus on architectural specifications, memory support, and platform characteristics.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design lineages. The Intel Core 3 304 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, belongs to the Core 3 (Wildcat Lake) generation, and is built on a 3 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 uses the Oryon codename, belongs to the Snapdragon X (Elite) generation, and is built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC.

Core counts differ substantially. The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads, meaning no hyper-threading is present. The Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads, also without simultaneous multi-threading. The Snapdragon part offers more than double the physical core count.

Clock behavior also diverges. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, indicating a wide frequency range for burst workloads. The Snapdragon part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz but no boost clock listed in the database, suggesting a fixed or unlisted maximum frequency.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. The Intel Core 3 304 has 192 KB of L1 cache, 2.5 MB of L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The per-core cache allocation on the Snapdragon is significantly larger, and the L2 cache is organized in modules rather than a single monolithic block.

Memory support also differs. The Intel chip supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a single-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Snapdragon part supports only LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Snapdragon more than doubles the memory bandwidth available to the Intel part.

PCIe connectivity is another differentiator. The Intel Core 3 304 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only), while the Snapdragon X1E-78-100 provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The Snapdragon doubles the available PCIe lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Intel part uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core, while the Snapdragon part uses the Adreno X1-85.

Both processors are mobile market segments, are currently marked as Active in production status, and do not have unlocked multipliers. Neither supports ECC memory.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 wins on specifications that enable high throughput in parallel and memory-heavy workloads. The 12 cores versus 5 cores gives it a structural advantage in any workload that scales with core count. The dual-channel LPDDR5X memory interface with 135.2 GB/s of bandwidth versus 59.7 GB/s on the Intel part means memory-bound tasks such as large dataset processing, data streaming, and certain database operations can move data much faster. The 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 6 lanes also allows more simultaneous high-speed device connections.

The Intel Core 3 304 wins on frequency flexibility and platform compatibility. The boost clock of 4.30 GHz, compared to the Snapdragon's listed base clock of 3.40 GHz with no boost figure, suggests the Intel part can reach higher single-thread burst performance when the workload demands it. The support for both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory gives system designers more options for memory configuration, even though the bus width is narrower. The Intel chip also has a smaller process node at 3 nm versus 4 nm, which can indicate better power efficiency per transistor, though the database does not provide direct power consumption measurements.

The Intel Core 3 304 has a recorded benchmark profile, which allows comparison against other CPUs in the database. Its 68th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms a majority of recorded processors. With an average benchmark score of 13745, it lands within 1.4% of the AMD EPYC 7443 and 0.9% of the Intel Core i7-8750H, both of which are higher-scoring, while it sits 1.1% above the Intel Core 5 120UL. These deltas are small, showing the Core 3 304 is competitive with those established parts.

The Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has no recorded benchmarks, no average score, and no nearest rivals, so the database provides no evidence of its actual performance. It ranks at the 50th percentile by default, but this is not based on any measured data. The only concrete advantages are structural: more cores, more cache, more memory bandwidth, and more PCIe lanes.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 supports only LPDDR5X memory.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each processor provide?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 provides 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel bus. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 provides 135.2 GB/s over a dual-channel bus.

Q: What are the process nodes for these two chips?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 is built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Does either processor have an unlocked multiplier?

A: No. Both the Intel Core 3 304 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 have locked multipliers.

Q: What is the release date for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 was released on 2026-04-15. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 was released on 2024-04-23.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 3 304 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 |

|----------------|------------------|-------------------------------|

| Cores | 5 | 12 |

| Threads | 5 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 1.50 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 15 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Codename | Wildcat Lake | Oryon |

| Generation | Core 3 (Wildcat Lake) | Snapdragon X (Elite) |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 12 MB (per module) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 135.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) | Adreno X1-85 |

| Release Date | 2026-04-15 | 2024-04-23 |

| Launch MSRP | $309 | Not listed |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | SAE3K | X1E78100 |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split between these two processors. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 is the stronger choice for workloads that benefit from raw core count, memory bandwidth, and PCIe connectivity. With 12 cores versus 5, 135.2 GB/s versus 59.7 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and 12 PCIe lanes versus 6, the Snapdragon is structurally better positioned for parallel processing, large data movement, and multi-device configurations. Its 35 W TDP reflects a higher power budget for sustained throughput.

The Intel Core 3 304 is the more appropriate pick for scenarios where single-thread burst performance and platform flexibility matter. Its 4.30 GHz boost clock, support for both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, and smaller 3 nm process node give it advantages in frequency-sensitive applications and power efficiency per transistor. Its 15 W TDP is substantially lower, which can matter in thermally constrained mobile designs.

The Intel part has verified benchmark scores placing it at the 68th percentile overall, with an average score of 13745 and competitive deltas against the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (-0.3%), Intel Core i7-8750H (-0.9%), Intel Core 5 120UL (+1.1%), and AMD EPYC 7443 (-1.4%). The Snapdragon has no recorded benchmark scores, so its actual performance cannot be verified from the database.

For a user who needs maximum multi-core throughput, high memory bandwidth, and many PCIe lanes, the Snapdragon X1E-78-100 is the data-backed choice. For a user who prioritizes high single-core frequency, lower power consumption, and broader memory compatibility, the Intel Core 3 304 is the better fit. The launch MSRP of the Intel part is $309, while the Snapdragon has no listed launch MSRP. The final decision depends entirely on the workload profile, as the two chips target different performance characteristics.