Intel Core 3 304 vs NVIDIA RTX Spark (MediaTek AHJ11488B) Comparison
Intel Core 3 304
RTX Spark (MediaTek AHJ11488B)
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 3 304 vs NVIDIA RTX Spark (MediaTek AHJ11488B)
The Verdict
The Intel Core 3 304 and the NVIDIA RTX Spark (MediaTek AHJ11488B) occupy different corners of the mobile processor market. The Core 3 304 is an active, shipping part with a full benchmark profile, while the RTX Spark is an unreleased chip with no recorded measurements in the database. The data shows that the Core 3 304 sits at the 68th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13745, placing it within 1.1% of the Intel Core 5 120UL and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. The RTX Spark, by contrast, has a 50th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no performance data exists for it. For any purchase decision today, the Core 3 304 is the only option with measurable performance. The RTX Spark remains a specification sheet until it ships and receives testing.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 3 304 wins in every measured benchmark category because it has actual scores. It delivers 849 points in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 4160 in R20 multi-core, and 5263 in R23 multi-core. Single-core results are equally complete: 264 in R15, 587 in R20, and 1765 in R23. PassMark tests show strengths in data compression (114775), integer math (24640), floating point math (29722), and multithreaded workloads (11625). The RTX Spark has zero recorded wins, as no benchmark results exist in the database. Its advantage is purely architectural: 20 cores versus 5, a quad-channel memory bus versus single-channel, and a higher base clock of 1.70 GHz versus 1.50 GHz. But without measurements, those specifications cannot translate into demonstrated wins. The Core 3 304 also has a higher boost clock at 4.30 GHz versus 4.00 GHz, which supports its single-threaded performance lead in every recorded test.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different design philosophies. The Intel Core 3 304 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, part of the Core 3 generation, built on a 3 nm process at Intel’s foundry. It packs 5 cores and 5 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The RTX Spark, codenamed N1X and part of the Spark (GB10) generation, is also built on a 3 nm process but comes from TSMC. It has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. Its cache layout is notably different: 128 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The die size for the RTX Spark is 208 mm², a figure not available for the Intel part. The RTX Spark uses a quad-channel memory bus with LPDDR5X support and a theoretical bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s, while the Intel chip uses single-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X with 59.7 GB/s. The RTX Spark integrates GB20B “Blackwell” graphics, while the Intel part includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. The Intel chip uses the Intel BGA 1516 socket, whereas the RTX Spark lists no socket. The RTX Spark has no PCIe lanes listed, but the Intel part supports PCIe Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. Neither supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The NVIDIA RTX Spark has 20 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads.
Q: What is the single-thread performance difference in the recorded data?
A: The Intel Core 3 304 shows a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1765, while the RTX Spark has no recorded single-core benchmarks. The database contains no comparable RTX Spark measurements.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 3 304 boosts to 4.30 GHz, which is higher than the RTX Spark’s 4.00 GHz boost clock.
Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?
A: The RTX Spark lists 273.1 GB/s over a quad-channel LPDDR5X bus, while the Intel Core 3 304 lists 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X bus.
Q: Are there any benchmark results for the RTX Spark?
A: No. The database shows zero benchmark entries for the RTX Spark, and its average benchmark score is 0. The Intel Core 3 304 has 17 recorded tests.
Q: What is the production status of each processor?
A: The Intel Core 3 304 is marked as Active, with a release date of 2026-04-15. The RTX Spark is marked as unreleased, with a release date of 2025-12-31.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, with zero wins for either side. This is because the RTX Spark has no measurements. The Intel Core 3 304, however, provides a full suite of scores that define its performance envelope. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 5263 and single-core score of 1765 represent the highest recorded values for this chip in that suite. The R20 results show 4160 multi-core and 587 single-core, while R15 shows 849 multi-core and 264 single-core. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: data compression at 114775, data encryption at 8501, extended instructions at 9686, prime number finding at 68, floating point math at 29722, integer math at 24640, multithreaded performance at 11625, physics at 868, random string sorting at 13659, and single-thread at 3614. The nearest rivals for the Intel chip in the database include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which scores 13786 on average, just 0.3% higher than the Core 3 304’s 13745. The Intel Core i7-8750H scores 13868, 0.9% higher, while the Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13594, 1.1% lower. The AMD EPYC 7443 scores 13936, 1.4% higher. These deltas show the Core 3 304 clustering tightly with established desktop and mobile parts. The RTX Spark has no nearest rivals and no deltas, so its relative standing cannot be assessed.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads, while the RTX Spark has 20 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 1.50 GHz versus 1.70 GHz, and boost clocks are 4.30 GHz versus 4.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 15 watts for the Intel part and 38 watts for the RTX Spark. The Intel chip uses the Intel BGA 1516 socket, while the RTX Spark has no socket listed. The codename differs: Wildcat Lake for Intel, N1X for the RTX Spark. The generation labels also differ: Core 3 (Wildcat Lake) versus Spark (GB10). Both use a 3 nm process, but Intel is the foundry for the Core 3 304, and TSMC for the RTX Spark. The die size is 208 mm² for the RTX Spark, with no figure for the Intel part. Cache configurations are distinct: the Intel chip has 192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3; the RTX Spark has 128 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 and LPDDR5X for Intel, LPDDR5X only for the RTX Spark. The memory bus is single-channel for Intel versus quad-channel for the RTX Spark, with bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s versus 273.1 GB/s. Neither supports ECC. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes for Intel, while the RTX Spark lists N/A. Integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) versus GB20B “Blackwell” for the RTX Spark. The market segment is Mobile for both. Production status is Active for Intel and unreleased for the RTX Spark. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $309, while the RTX Spark has no launch MSRP. The Intel part number is SAE3K, and the RTX Spark part number is GSE1-675-A1. The release date for Intel is 2026-04-15, and for the RTX Spark it is 2025-12-31. Both have locked multipliers. The Core 3 304 has a percentile of 68 among all CPUs, while the RTX Spark sits at 50. The average benchmark score is 13745 for Intel and 0 for the RTX Spark. These differences define two very different products: one is a low-power, high-clock mobile chip with proven results, the other is a high-core-count, high-bandwidth part awaiting validation.