Intel Core 3 304 vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison
Intel Core 3 304
Core 5 223PE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 3 304 vs Intel Core 5 223PE
The Intel Core 3 304 and Intel Core 5 223PE are two active Intel processors with different platform targets. The Core 3 304 is a Wildcat Lake mobile chip with 5 cores and 5 threads, a 15W TDP, and a 3 nm process node. The Core 5 223PE is a Bartlett Lake desktop chip with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 65W TDP, and a 10 nm process node. Across the 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, the Core 5 223PE wins every test. Its average benchmark score is 40585 against 13745 for the Core 3 304, and it sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs compared with the 68th percentile for the Core 3 304.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head set contains 17 comparisons, and the Intel Core 5 223PE wins all 17. The Intel Core 3 304 records 0 wins. The largest margin is in Cinebench R23 multi-core: the Core 5 223PE scores 26455, the Core 3 304 scores 5263, and the delta is -80.1 percent. PassMark integer math is the second largest gap: 99819 versus 24640, a -75.3 percent delta. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows 2666 versus 849, a -68.2 percent delta. PassMark data compression is 346623 versus 114775, a -66.9 percent delta. PassMark physics is 2493 versus 868, a -65.2 percent delta. PassMark multithread is 31124 versus 11625, a -62.6 percent delta, and Cinebench R20 multi-core is 11111 versus 4160, also -62.6 percent. PassMark random string sorting is 35798 versus 13659, a -61.8 percent delta. PassMark floating point math is 76468 versus 29722, a -61.1 percent delta. PassMark extended instructions is 24672 versus 9686, a -60.7 percent delta. PassMark find prime numbers is 159 versus 68, a -57.2 percent delta. PassMark data encryption is 18448 versus 8501, a -53.9 percent delta. Cinebench R23 single-core is 3734 versus 1765, a -52.7 percent delta. Cinebench R20 single-core is 1568 versus 587, a -62.6 percent delta. Cinebench R15 single-core is 376 versus 264, a -29.8 percent delta. The narrowest gap is PassMark single-thread, where the score is 4219 versus 3614, a -14.3 percent delta; the same single-thread result appears twice in the recorded set.
Architecture Differences
The Core 3 304 and Core 5 223PE use different Intel generations and sockets. The Core 3 304 is from the Core 3 (Wildcat Lake) generation, built on a 3 nm process, and uses Intel BGA 1516. The Core 5 223PE is from the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation, built on a 10 nm process, and uses Intel Socket 1700. Both are made by Intel and both are active production parts with locked multipliers. The Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads; the Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 1.50 GHz and 2.90 GHz, respectively, while boost clocks are 4.30 GHz and 5.20 GHz. TDP is 15W for the Core 3 304 and 65W for the Core 5 223PE.
Cache layouts differ as well. The Core 3 304 has 192 KB of L1 cache, 2.5 MB of L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 223PE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support also splits the pair: the Core 3 304 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X on a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Core 5 223PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported on the Core 3 304, but it is supported on the Core 5 223PE. The Core 3 304 provides Gen 4 PCIe with 6 CPU lanes; the Core 5 223PE provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe on the Core 3 304 and UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 223PE. The release dates in the database are 2026-03-08 for the Core 5 223PE and 2026-04-15 for the Core 3 304.
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data gives the Core 5 223PE a clean sweep: 17 wins and 0 wins for the Core 3 304. The Core 5 223PE is particularly dominant in multi-core and math-heavy tests. Its largest deltas are in Cinebench R23 multi-core at -80.1 percent, PassMark integer math at -75.3 percent, Cinebench R15 multi-core at -68.2 percent, PassMark data compression at -66.9 percent, PassMark physics at -65.2 percent, and PassMark multithread at -62.6 percent. These results place the Core 5 223PE ahead for Cinebench multi-core, compression, encryption, sorting, and computational workloads. The Core 3 304 is comparatively closest in single-thread tests: PassMark single-thread at -14.3 percent and Cinebench R15 single-core at -29.8 percent. Even there, it does not win. The Core 3 304's platform attributes, a 15W TDP, mobile BGA 1516 socket, single-channel memory, and 3 nm process, are not performance wins in the database. The Core 5 223PE's desktop attributes, 65W TDP, Socket 1700, dual-channel memory, ECC support, and Gen 5 PCIe, align with the benchmark results.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score and percentile?
A: The Core 5 223PE has an average benchmark score of 40585 and sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 3 304 has an average benchmark score of 13745 and sits at the 68th percentile.
Q: What is the largest recorded head-to-head margin?
A: Cinebench R23 multi-core: the Core 5 223PE scores 26455, the Core 3 304 scores 5263, and the delta is -80.1 percent. The second largest is PassMark integer math at -75.3 percent, 99819 versus 24640.
Q: How do the cache configurations differ?
A: The Core 3 304 has 192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3. The Core 5 223PE has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The Core 5 223PE supports ECC memory. The Core 3 304 does not support ECC memory.
Q: What platforms do the two processors use?
A: The Core 3 304 is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1516 with a 15W TDP and single-channel memory. The Core 5 223PE is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700 with a 65W TDP and dual-channel memory.
Q: What are the nearest rivals listed in the database?
A: For the Core 3 304, the nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX at 13786 (-0.3 percent), Intel Core i7-8750H at 13868 (-0.9 percent), Intel Core 5 120UL at 13594 (1.1 percent), and AMD EPYC 7443 at 13936 (-1.4 percent). For the Core 5 223PE, the nearest rivals are the Intel Core 7 253PE at 40557 (0.1 percent), Intel Xeon 6357P at 40630 (-0.1 percent), Intel Core Ultra X7 368H at 40518 (0.2 percent), and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G at 40718 (-0.3 percent).
The Verdict
The Core 5 223PE wins all 17 head-to-head benchmarks and holds the higher average score, 40585 versus 13745. It also occupies the higher percentile, 87 versus 68. Every measured workload in the head-to-head set, from Cinebench multi-core to PassMark integer math, encryption, compression, physics, and sorting, favors the Core 5 223PE. The Core 3 304 comes closest in single-thread tests, but still trails by 14.3 percent in PassMark single-thread and by 29.8 percent in Cinebench R15 single-core. The Core 3 304's advantages are platform-level: 15W TDP, 3 nm process, BGA 1516 socket, single-channel memory, and Intel Xe3 Graphics. The Core 5 223PE is the desktop option with 65W TDP, 10 nm process, Socket 1700, dual-channel memory, ECC support, Gen 5 PCIe, and UHD Graphics 730. For desktop systems where recorded benchmark performance is the priority, the Core 5 223PE is the indicated processor. For mobile systems requiring a 15W part on BGA 1516, the Core 3 304 is the only one of the two that fits. The benchmark data does not show a scenario where the Core 3 304 wins on performance.