Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

The Verdict

The data in the database presents two desktop processors on the same Intel Socket 1700 platform, but with distinctly different positioning. The Intel Core 3 201TE is the higher-tier part, with double the core and thread count of the Intel Processor 300T, a higher boost clock, and a larger shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor 300T counters with a higher base clock and a lower TDP. Benchmark results are not currently recorded for either part, so the analysis here is driven entirely by the specification-level differences captured in the database. The Core 3 201TE is the part to select for workloads that scale with parallel execution, given its 4 cores and 8 threads versus the 2 cores and 4 threads of the Processor 300T. The Processor 300T is the part to select for lower-power operation, with a 35 W TDP compared to the 45 W TDP of the Core 3 201TE, and for tasks where the higher 3.40 GHz base clock matters more than additional cores. The Core 3 201TE also carries ECC memory support and a more capable integrated graphics unit, making it the more feature-complete option for desktop builds that prioritize data integrity and display output.

Architecture Differences

The Core 3 201TE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename. Both processors are manufactured on a 10 nm process node at Intel, and both use a die size of 163 mm². The Core 3 201TE is part of the Core 3 generation, while the Processor 300T is part of the Intel Processor generation. The core configurations differ significantly: the Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads, whereas the Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads. The per-core cache structure is identical in size, with 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, but the shared L3 cache differs, with the Core 3 201TE featuring 12 MB shared versus 6 MB shared on the Processor 300T. The Core 3 201TE was released later, with a release date in January 2025, while the Processor 300T was released in January 2024. The production status for both is listed as Active. The integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710. ECC memory support is present on the Core 3 201TE but not on the Processor 300T. The Core 3 201TE has a part number of SRPKDQ5CK, and the Processor 300T has a part number of SRN3K.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the Core 3 201TE versus the Processor 300T. The benchmark arrays for both processors are empty, and the wins counters for each part are both zero. The average benchmark score for each processor is also zero, and both are placed at the 50th percentile against all CPUs in the database. This absence of recorded measurements means that direct performance comparisons cannot be drawn from test data at this time. The nearest rivals lists for both processors are also empty, so there is no comparative benchmark context from other CPUs to substitute. What the database does provide is a clear specification-level comparison that can inform expectations. The Core 3 201TE has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Processor 300T has no recorded boost clock, only a base clock of 3.40 GHz. The Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz. The extra two cores and four threads on the Core 3 201TE, combined with double the L3 cache, point to a substantial advantage in multi-threaded workloads, though the exact magnitude cannot be quantified without benchmark scores. The Processor 300T has a higher base clock, which suggests an advantage in lightly threaded tasks that rely on single-core frequency, but again, the data does not yet confirm this with measured results.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads. The base clock of the Core 3 201TE is 2.90 GHz, while the Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz. The Core 3 201TE has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Processor 300T has no boost clock listed. The TDP of the Core 3 201TE is 45 W, while the Processor 300T is 35 W. The L3 cache is 12 MB shared on the Core 3 201TE versus 6 MB shared on the Processor 300T. The architectures differ, with the Core 3 201TE using the Bartlett Lake codename and the Processor 300T using the Raptor Lake architecture and Raptor Lake-S codename. The generation names differ as well: Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) versus Intel Processor (Raptor Lake). The integrated graphics differ, with UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 3 201TE and UHD Graphics 710 on the Processor 300T. ECC memory support is true for the Core 3 201TE and false for the Processor 300T. The release dates differ, with the Core 3 201TE released in January 2025 and the Processor 300T released in January 2024. The launch MSRP for the Core 3 201TE is $134, and the launch MSRP for the Processor 300T is $82. The part numbers differ: SRPKDQ5CK for the Core 3 201TE and SRN3K for the Processor 300T. The memory bandwidth field is 76.8 GB/s for the Core 3 201TE, while the Processor 300T has no recorded memory bandwidth. Both processors share the same socket, process node, foundry, die size, L1 and L2 cache sizes per core, memory support for DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel memory bus, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, desktop market segment, and active production status. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: How many cores does the Intel Core 3 201TE have compared to the Intel Processor 300T?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no recorded boost clock.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 W, which is lower than the 45 W TDP of the Intel Core 3 201TE.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300T does not.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors use?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710.

Q: What are the launch MSRP values for these processors?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 3 201TE is $134, and the launch MSRP for the Intel Processor 300T is $82.

Q: What is the shared L3 cache size on each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Processor 300T has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 201TE wins on multi-threaded capability. Its 4 cores and 8 threads double the thread count of the Intel Processor 300T, and its 12 MB shared L3 cache doubles the 6 MB shared L3 cache of the Processor 300T. The Core 3 201TE also has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, which provides a frequency ceiling for single-threaded bursts that the Processor 300T cannot match, as it has no recorded boost clock. The Core 3 201TE also holds advantages in ECC memory support, which the Processor 300T lacks, and a higher-tier integrated graphics unit in UHD Graphics 730 versus UHD Graphics 710. The recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s on the Core 3 201TE further separates it from the Processor 300T, which has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. For memory-heavy workloads, the Core 3 201TE appears better positioned.

The Intel Processor 300T wins on power efficiency and base frequency. Its 35 W TDP is lower than the 45 W TDP of the Core 3 201TE, making it the more power-conscious choice for systems where thermal and energy constraints are primary. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz is higher than the 2.90 GHz base clock of the Core 3 201TE, which suggests an advantage in workloads that operate at sustained base frequency without boosting. The Processor 300T also has a lower launch MSRP of $82 compared to the $134 of the Core 3 201TE, which is a notable difference in the recorded data. The Processor 300T shares the same socket, process node, die size, memory support, and PCIe configuration as the Core 3 201TE, so platform-level compatibility is similar. For basic desktop tasks that do not require many cores, the higher base clock and lower power draw of the Processor 300T give it a clear use case, while the Core 3 201TE is the choice for more demanding workloads that benefit from additional cores, threads, cache, and ECC support.