Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and Intel Core 3 201TE occupy very different tiers of Intel's desktop lineup, and the recorded benchmark data reflects that gap clearly. The Core Ultra 5 245T carries a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results in the database, while the Core 3 201TE currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence of data for the 201TE means direct head-to-head comparisons must be drawn from architectural specifications and the Ultra 5's measured performance against its nearest rivals.

The Core Ultra 5 245T posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208, which is a strong result for a 65 W desktop part. Its single-core score in the same test reaches 3699. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 11007 and the single-core result is 1553. The older Cinebench R15 workload produces a multi-core score of 2641 and a single-core score of 372. These numbers indicate that the Ultra 5 245T scales impressively across threaded workloads, with multi-core scores roughly seven times its single-core scores in R15 and R20, and about seven times in R23 as well.

PassMark results for the Ultra 5 245T show broad strength across different instruction types. Integer math scores 88676, floating point math reaches 108499, and extended instructions hit 22071. Data compression records 283812, while data encryption manages 23656. The find prime numbers test returns 324, random string sorting scores 34931, and the physics test delivers 2278. The multithread score is 30833, and single-thread performance is 4367. These figures place the chip in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 38194.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Ultra 5 245T's standing. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 posts an average score of 38221, which is 0.1% higher than the Ultra 5 245T. The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38149, putting it 0.1% behind. The Intel Core i5-13600HX records 38261, a 0.2% advantage over the Ultra 5 245T. The Intel Core i5-13600KF comes in at 38103, 0.2% lower. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the Ultra 5 245T sits in a tightly contested performance cluster where no single competitor holds a decisive edge.

Because the Core 3 201TE has no benchmark entries, its relative standing cannot be quantified from measured scores. The database does show its percentile rank at 50, which suggests it sits near the midpoint of all CPUs, but no average score or rival comparisons accompany that figure. The head-to-head benchmark array between the two processors is empty, and the win counters show zero for both sides.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 5 245T supports ECC memory.

Q: What socket does the Intel Core 3 201TE use?

A: The Core 3 201TE uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: How many cores does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T have?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245T has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core 3 201TE?

A: The Core 3 201TE has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245T has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What integrated graphics does the Core Ultra 5 245T include?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245T includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and are built on different process nodes. The Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Arrow Lake-S codename and the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The foundry shift is a notable distinction: Intel produces the 201TE, while TSMC produces the Ultra 5 245T.

Transistor counts and die sizes differ substantially. The Core 3 201TE has no recorded transistor count, but its die size is 163 mm². The Core Ultra 5 245T contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The smaller process node combined with a larger die area gives the Ultra 5 245T significantly more transistor budget for its 14-core configuration.

Core and thread counts diverge sharply. The Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245T has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Ultra 5 245T does not use simultaneous multithreading, as its thread count matches its core count. The 201TE, by contrast, doubles its threads through hyperthreading-style parallelism.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The Core 3 201TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 245T has 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 3 MB of L2 cache per core, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Every level of cache favors the Ultra 5 245T in both per-core and total capacity.

Memory support separates the two as well. The Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Core Ultra 5 245T supports DDR5 only, also dual-channel, but with a higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The PCIe implementation differs too: the 201TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 5 245T provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

The Verdict

The database presents a clear performance hierarchy, though it is complicated by the absence of measured benchmarks for the Core 3 201TE. The Core Ultra 5 245T delivers strong multi-threaded and single-threaded results across Cinebench and PassMark workloads, and it posts an average benchmark score of 38194 with an 86th percentile ranking. The Core 3 201TE has no recorded average score and sits at the 50th percentile, which places it in the middle of the database distribution.

The Ultra 5 245T's nearest rivals all land within 0.2% of its average score, indicating that the chip is competitively positioned against other mid-range and upper-mid-range processors. The Core 3 201TE lacks any rival data, so its performance envelope cannot be compared with the same precision.

For workloads that benefit from high core counts, large caches, and fast memory bandwidth, the Core Ultra 5 245T is the processor with the observed data to back its capability. The Core 3 201TE offers a lower core count, smaller caches, and a narrower memory interface, but it also supports DDR4, which may matter for certain platform configurations. The production status of both processors is Active, and both were released in January 2025, with the 201TE on January 12 and the Ultra 5 245T on January 6.

Users selecting between these two should weigh the Ultra 5 245T's measured benchmark dominance and architectural advantages against the 201TE's lower core count and legacy memory support. The data does not support a scenario where the 201TE outperforms the Ultra 5 245T in raw throughput, given the latter's 14 cores, larger caches, and higher boost clock.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field. The Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245T has 14 cores and 14 threads. Base clocks are 2.90 GHz for the 201TE and 2.20 GHz for the Ultra 5 245T, but boost clocks reverse the order: 4.60 GHz for the 201TE and 5.10 GHz for the Ultra 5 245T. TDP figures are 45 W for the 201TE and 65 W for the Ultra 5 245T.

Sockets differ: Intel Socket 1700 for the 201TE, Intel Socket 1851 for the Ultra 5 245T. Process nodes are 10 nm for the 201TE and 3 nm for the Ultra 5 245T. Foundries are Intel and TSMC, respectively. Die sizes are 163 mm² for the 201TE and 243 mm² for the Ultra 5 245T. The Ultra 5 245T records 17,800 million transistors, while the 201TE has no transistor count listed.

Cache configurations diverge at every level. The 201TE has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The Ultra 5 245T has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 for the 201TE, DDR5 only for the Ultra 5 245T. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s versus 102.4 GB/s. PCIe lanes from the CPU are 16 for the 201TE and 20 for the Ultra 5 245T, both Gen 5.

Integrated graphics differ as well: UHD Graphics 730 on the 201TE versus Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU on the Ultra 5 245T. Both support ECC memory. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The launch MSRP for the Core 3 201TE is $134, and the launch MSRP for the Core Ultra 5 245T is $270.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 245T wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Cinebench scores, PassMark scores, cache capacities, memory bandwidth, core count, boost clock, and process node all favor it. The chip's 86th percentile ranking and average score of 38194, with nearest rivals within 0.2%, show that it competes at a high level for its class.

The Core 3 201TE holds advantages in areas that are not measured by benchmarks but are still relevant to platform decisions. It supports DDR4 memory, which the Ultra 5 245T does not, and its 45 W TDP is lower than the Ultra 5 245T's 65 W. The 201TE also uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which may be more accessible than the newer Socket 1851. Its launch MSRP of $134 is lower than the Ultra 5 245T's $270, though pricing is not a performance metric.

For multi-threaded rendering, data compression, encryption, and physics simulations, the recorded results point squarely at the Core Ultra 5 245T. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 and PassMark multithread score of 30833 demonstrate substantial parallel throughput. The Core 3 201TE has no such data, and its 4-core, 8-thread configuration would not be expected to approach these figures.

For single-threaded workloads, the Ultra 5 245T's 4367 PassMark single-thread score and 3699 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicate strong per-core performance, aided by its 5.10 GHz boost clock. The Core 3 201TE's 4.60 GHz boost clock is lower, and it lacks any recorded single-thread scores.

The practical split is straightforward: the Core Ultra 5 245T is the processor for users who need measured multi-core and single-core performance, larger caches, faster memory bandwidth, and modern architecture. The Core 3 201TE is the processor for users who prioritize a lower TDP, DDR4 compatibility, and the Socket 1700 ecosystem, provided they accept the lack of benchmark validation and the substantial hardware gap.