Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core 3 201TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it does not use simultaneous multithreading.

Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of process node and foundry?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX uses a 3 nm process fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX boosts to 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the 4.60 GHz boost clock of the Intel Core 3 201TE.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 12 MB shared L3 cache found on the Intel Core 3 201TE.

Q: Do these processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the market segment and socket for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX is a mobile processor using Intel BGA 2114.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design approaches within Intel's lineup. The Intel Core 3 201TE is based on the Bartlett Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundries. It is a desktop part with 4 cores and 8 threads, indicating that it uses Hyper-Threading technology to reach 8 threads from 4 physical cores. Its die size is 163 mm², and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-HX variant. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process, a significantly more advanced node than the 10 nm process used for the Core 3 201TE. The Ultra 5 245HX packs 14 cores and 14 threads, with no Hyper-Threading, and features a much larger die at 243 mm². The transistor count for the Ultra 5 245HX is listed at 17,800 million, while the Core 3 201TE has no transistor count listed in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The Core 3 201TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 245HX has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The per-core cache values are notably higher on the Ultra 5 245HX, and the total L3 cache is exactly double that of the Core 3 201TE.

Memory support also separates the two. The Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Core Ultra 5 245HX supports only DDR5, also dual-channel, but with a higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The Ultra 5 245HX also provides more PCIe lanes: Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), compared to Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) on the Core 3 201TE.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 245HX uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 48 execution units. The Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Core Ultra 5 245HX. The Ultra 5 245HX has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Core 3 201TE is locked. Both processors were released on the same date, 2025-01-12, and both have an active production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 3 201TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX. The Intel Core 3 201TE has no benchmark entries, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals listed in the recorded data. In contrast, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX has a full set of benchmark results across Cinebench and Passmark tests, an average benchmark score of 48,287, and a percentile ranking of 90 against all CPUs.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX delivers substantial multi-core performance in Cinebench tests. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 32,358, and its Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 13,590. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 3,261. Single-core results are also strong: 4,568 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1,918 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 460 in Cinebench R15 single-core.

Passmark results for the Ultra 5 245HX show strong throughput across various workloads. The multithread score is 38,069, and the single-thread score is 4,481. Integer math scores 92,150, floating point math scores 120,735, and extended instructions score 31,212. Data compression scores 393,071, data encryption scores 30,022, and random string sorting scores 47,616. The physics score is 2,526, and find prime numbers scores 359.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX provide context for its performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A has an average score of 48,201, which is 0.2% lower than the 245HX. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 also scores 48,171, 0.2% lower. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48,470, which is 0.4% higher than the 245HX. The Intel Core i5-14600K scores 48,618, 0.7% higher. These delta percentages confirm that the Ultra 5 245HX sits in a tightly competitive band, with all four rivals within approximately one percentage point of its average score.

Because the Core 3 201TE has no benchmark scores recorded, the data cannot quantify its performance relative to the Ultra 5 245HX. The comparison is therefore asymmetric: the Ultra 5 245HX has comprehensive performance data, while the Core 3 201TE has none. The percentile rankings reinforce this gap, with the Core 3 201TE at the 50th percentile against all CPUs and the Ultra 5 245HX at the 90th percentile.

The Verdict

The recorded data strongly favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX in every measurable dimension. It has more cores, higher clock speeds, a more advanced process node, more cache, higher memory bandwidth, more PCIe lanes, and a complete set of benchmark results. Its 90th percentile ranking against all CPUs, combined with an average benchmark score of 48,287, places it firmly in the upper tier of processors. The nearest rival data shows it trading positions with the Core Ultra 5 235A, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, the AMD EPYC 4345P, and the Core i5-14600K, all within a 0.7% band.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, by contrast, offers no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. Its architectural characteristics, including 4 cores, 8 threads, a 10 nm process, 12 MB of L3 cache, and DDR4/DDR5 support, position it as a more modest desktop part. Its ECC memory support is a distinguishing feature that the Ultra 5 245HX lacks, which may matter for specific reliability-focused use cases. Its launch MSRP is $134, a detail recorded in the database.

The choice between the two depends on measurable priorities. The Ultra 5 245HX delivers far greater multi-core and single-core performance as evidenced by its benchmark suite, and its unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking. The Core 3 201TE offers ECC support and a lower power envelope at 45 W TDP compared to 55 W TDP for the Ultra 5 245HX. The Core 3 201TE also supports DDR4 memory, which can be relevant for systems reusing older memory modules.

For workloads that rely on multi-threaded throughput, the 14-core Ultra 5 245HX is the clear choice based on its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,358 and Passmark multithread score of 38,069. For single-threaded responsiveness, its 5.10 GHz boost clock and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,568 indicate strong performance. The Core 3 201TE, with no benchmark data, cannot be positioned on the same performance scale.

The data indicates that the Ultra 5 245HX is the higher-performing processor by a wide margin, while the Core 3 201TE retains specific platform advantages in ECC support, DDR4 compatibility, and lower TDP. Each processor serves a distinct segment, one mobile and high-performance, the other desktop and efficiency-oriented.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 3 201TE | Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 14 |

| Threads | 8 | 14 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 3.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 55 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2114 |

| Architecture | Bartlett Lake | Arrow Lake-HX |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | 243 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 17,800 million |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 48EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Launch MSRP | $134 | Not listed |

The specification table highlights the structural differences between the two processors. The Ultra 5 245HX leads in core count, thread count, clock speeds, cache capacities, process node, memory bandwidth, PCIe lanes, and transistor count. The Core 3 201TE leads in ECC support, DDR4 compatibility, and lower TDP. The production status for both is Active, and both were released on 2025-01-12.