Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the Intel Core 3 201TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, though direct head-to-head benchmark results are not available in the database. What can be established is that the Core Ultra 5 245 holds an average benchmark score of 48,995, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs tracked. The Core 3 201TE, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, meaning no comparable workload scores have been recorded for it.

The Core Ultra 5 245 delivers its strongest results in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 32,924 in the multi-core test and 4,648 in single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 13,828 multi-core and 1,952 single-core, while Cinebench R15 records 3,318 multi-core and 468 single-core. The Passmark suite reinforces this pattern: multithread score of 38,706, integer math at 91,187, floating point math at 120,548, and extended instructions at 33,304.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Core Ultra 5 245's positioning. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49,196, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49,228, 0.5% higher. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H trails by 0.6% at 48,698, and the Intel Core i5-14600K trails by 0.8% at 48,618. This places the Core Ultra 5 245 in a tight competitive cluster, effectively matching those four processors within a 1.4% total spread.

Single-thread performance on the Core Ultra 5 245 is strong relative to its multi-thread standing. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,394 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,648 both indicate a high-frequency design that excels in lightly threaded tasks. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz supports this, as does the base clock of 3.50 GHz.

The Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores, which makes direct numerical comparisons impossible. Its percentile ranking of 50 indicates it sits at the midpoint of all CPUs in the database, but the absence of workload scores means the data cannot confirm specific performance levels in any individual test.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 245 wins in every measurable category, based on the recorded data. It uses 14 cores and 14 threads, a configuration that suits parallel workloads such as rendering, compression, and scientific computing. The Passmark data compression score of 400,942 and data encryption score of 30,236 demonstrate strong throughput in data-heavy tasks. Random string sorting at 49,140 and find prime numbers at 365 rounds out the computational profile.

The Core 3 201TE offers a lower-power alternative. Its 45 W TDP compared to the Core Ultra 5 245's 65 W TDP suggests it draws less power under load, though the database records no power consumption measurements. Its 4 cores and 8 threads make it suitable for basic desktop tasks, light productivity, and scenarios where the workload does not scale beyond a few threads. The 2.90 GHz base clock and 4.60 GHz boost clock indicate it can handle single-threaded responsive work, but the lack of recorded benchmarks prevents quantitative confirmation.

Memory bandwidth favors the Core Ultra 5 245 at 102.4 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Core 3 201TE. This matters for memory-intensive workloads such as large dataset manipulation and high-resolution video processing. The Core Ultra 5 245 also supports only DDR5, while the Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving the latter more flexibility in system build options.

The integrated graphics differ significantly. The Core Ultra 5 245 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, while the Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The database records no graphics benchmarks, so the performance gap cannot be quantified, but the execution unit count suggests the Arc solution is substantially more capable for display output and light GPU acceleration.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245 records an average benchmark score of 48,995. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49,196 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49,228 (0.5% higher), the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48,698 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Core i5-14600K scores 48,618 (0.8% lower).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 supports DDR5 only. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE boosts to 4.60 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 boosts to 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the production status of both processors?

A: Both the Intel Core 3 201TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 are listed as Active in production status.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 3 201TE | Intel Core Ultra 5 245 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 14 |

| Threads | 8 | 14 |

| Base clock | 2.90 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Process node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die size | 163 mm² | 243 mm² |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 17,800 million |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1.25 MB per core | 3 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 12 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| PCIe lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |

| Generation | Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) | Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) |

| Release date | 2025-01-12 | 2025-01-06 |

| Launch MSRP | $134 | $270 |

| Part number | SRPKDQ5CK | SRVFE |

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Arrow Lake-S codename with the Arrow Lake architecture and is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. This process difference is substantial: the newer, denser 3 nm node allows the Core Ultra 5 245 to pack 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die, while the Core 3 201TE's transistor count is not recorded in the database, though its die size is 163 mm².

The cache hierarchy differs in both capacity and organization. The Core 3 201TE provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 245 provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core caches on the Core Ultra 5 245 indicate a design aimed at reducing memory latency and improving instruction throughput per core.

Memory architecture also diverges. The Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, which is a legacy-friendly option, while the Core Ultra 5 245 supports DDR5 exclusively. The memory bandwidth figures reflect this: 76.8 GB/s for the Core 3 201TE versus 102.4 GB/s for the Core Ultra 5 245. Both are dual-channel configurations.

PCIe connectivity favors the Core Ultra 5 245 with 20 CPU-only Gen 5 lanes versus 16 on the Core 3 201TE. This provides additional headroom for high-bandwidth expansion cards such as storage controllers or accelerators.

The integrated graphics represent a generational leap. The Core 3 201TE ships with UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 245 ships with Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The database does not record graphics benchmark scores for either, so the performance delta remains unquantified, but the architectural difference is clear.

Both processors support ECC memory, which is notable for workstation and small-server deployments. Both are listed as Desktop market segment products with Active production status. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 records an average benchmark score of 48,995 and sits at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with strong results across Cinebench and Passmark workloads. Its 14 cores, 14 threads, 5.10 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB of L3 cache make it a capable processor for multi-threaded rendering, data processing, and high-frequency single-threaded tasks. Its nearest rivals cluster within 0.8% of its average score, placing it in the same performance tier as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, AMD Ryzen 9 7900, Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, and Intel Core i5-14600K.

The Intel Core 3 201TE occupies a different position entirely. With no recorded benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking, the database provides no evidence of its absolute performance. What is known: 4 cores, 8 threads, a 4.60 GHz boost clock, 12 MB of L3 cache, and a 45 W TDP. This configuration targets efficiency and basic desktop workloads rather than high-end performance.

The choice between the two depends on workload requirements. For users who need maximum throughput in multi-threaded applications, the Core Ultra 5 245 is the only option with recorded evidence of performance. For users who prioritize lower power consumption, the Core 3 201TE's 45 W TDP gives it an advantage, and its DDR4 support enables more economical system builds. The Core Ultra 5 245 costs more at launch MSRP of $270 compared to $134 for the Core 3 201TE, but the performance data justifies the difference for compute-heavy use cases. The Core 3 201TE, lacking recorded benchmarks, should be selected only when the workload is known to be light and efficiency is the primary concern.