Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows an unambiguous split between these two processors. The Intel Core 3 201TE has no benchmark entries in the database, while the Intel Core i5-14600 carries 19 recorded test scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark suites. This means every measurable performance category favors the i5-14600, from single-threaded workloads to heavily multithreaded rendering tasks.

The Core 3 201TE is positioned as a lower-power desktop part with 4 cores and 8 threads, a 45 TDP, and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its absence from the benchmark database means the analysis must rely on architectural and specification comparisons rather than direct score differentials. The i5-14600, by contrast, delivers a complete benchmark profile that places it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 44,889.

Workload segmentation matters here. For single-threaded responsiveness, the i5-14600 posts a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,300 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,424. For multithreaded productivity, its Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 30,464, and Passmark multithread shows 35,848. The Core 3 201TE offers no comparable numbers, so any use-case analysis must note that the i5-14600 dominates every category where data exists.

The i5-14600 also wins on memory bandwidth specifications. The Core 3 201TE lists 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, while the i5-14600 does not specify a figure in the database. However, the i5-14600 doubles the L3 cache (24 MB shared versus 12 MB shared) and provides 14 cores versus 4, which directly impacts cache-sensitive and parallel workloads.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14600 is the superior processor across all recorded benchmarks. Its 89th percentile ranking versus the Core 3 201TE's 50th percentile places it firmly ahead in the database's overall performance distribution. The i5-14600's average benchmark score of 44,889 stands in contrast to the Core 3 201TE's 0 recorded average, which reflects the absence of test data rather than an actual performance of zero.

For users requiring heavy multithreaded throughput, the i5-14600 delivers Cinebench R23 multi-core of 30,464 and Passmark integer math of 117,078. The Core 3 201TE's 4-core, 8-thread configuration with a 45 TDP suggests a thermal and power profile suited to compact or low-power systems, but the database provides no benchmark confirmation of its capabilities.

The i5-14600 also offers a higher boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 4.60 GHz), a larger die (257 mm² versus 163 mm²), and a more capable integrated GPU (UHD Graphics 770 versus UHD Graphics 730). Its launch MSRP is $255, while the Core 3 201TE launches at $134. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking potential is limited on both.

The verdict from the available data is straightforward: the i5-14600 is the choice for performance-oriented desktop builds where benchmark scores matter. The Core 3 201TE may serve specific low-power or cost-constrained scenarios, but no recorded measurements support a performance advantage in any workload category.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors. The wins count shows 0 for the Core 3 201TE and 0 for the i5-14600, meaning no paired test results exist. However, the i5-14600's standalone benchmark suite provides the only quantitative performance data in this comparison.

Starting with Cinebench R15, the i5-14600 scores 3,070 in multi-core and 433 in single-core. Moving to Cinebench R20, it posts 12,794 multi-core and 1,806 single-core. The R23 iteration shows 30,464 multi-core and 4,300 single-core. These progressive increases across Cinebench versions reflect the i5-14600's consistent scaling under sustained multithreaded loads.

Geekbench results reinforce the pattern: 14,680 multi-core and 2,424 single-core. Passmark tests add granularity across specific instruction types. Integer math scores 117,078, floating-point math scores 85,759, and extended instructions score 25,674. Data compression reaches 434,620, while data encryption hits 25,082. Prime number finding scores 155, random string sorting scores 48,043, physics scores 2,330, and single-thread performance registers at 4,167.

The nearest rivals for the i5-14600 provide context. The Intel Core i9-12900KS averages 45,094, a 0.5% delta below the i5-14600. The AMD EPYC 4344P averages 45,122, also 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D sits 0.7% behind at 44,573, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H trails by 1% at 44,466. These margins are tight, placing the i5-14600 within striking distance of higher-tier and newer processors.

The Core 3 201TE has no rivals listed and no benchmark scores, so its comparative standing cannot be quantified from the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock differences?

A: The i5-14600 boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Core 3 201TE boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The i5-14600 has 24 MB shared L3 cache, and the Core 3 201TE has 12 MB shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 3 201TE and the i5-14600 support ECC memory, and both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: What integrated graphics do they use?

A: The Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14600 uses UHD Graphics 770.

Q: What is the i5-14600's percentile ranking compared to the Core 3 201TE?

A: The i5-14600 ranks at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the Core 3 201TE ranks at the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the Intel Socket 1700 platform and the 10 nm process node, but their internal designs diverge significantly. The Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the i5-14600 uses Raptor Lake-R with the Raptor Lake architecture. The Core 3 201TE belongs to the Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) generation, and the i5-14600 belongs to the Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation.

Core counts differ by a factor of 3.5: the i5-14600 packs 14 cores versus 4 on the Core 3 201TE. Thread counts follow proportionally, with 20 threads versus 8. The i5-14600's die measures 257 mm², substantially larger than the Core 3 201TE's 163 mm², reflecting the additional cores and cache.

Cache hierarchies show structural differences beyond capacity. Both allocate 80 KB L1 cache per core. L2 cache differs per core: the Core 3 201TE has 1.25 MB per core, while the i5-14600 has 2 MB per core. Shared L3 cache doubles from 12 MB on the Core 3 201TE to 24 MB on the i5-14600.

Both processors support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, dual-channel memory, and DDR4/DDR5 memory. Both have ECC support. The i5-14600 features UHD Graphics 770, one tier above the Core 3 201TE's UHD Graphics 730. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The table below summarizes only the fields where the two processors differ according to the database.

| Specification | Intel Core 3 201TE | Intel Core i5-14600 |

|---|---|---|

| Series | None listed | Core 14th Gen |

| Architecture | None listed | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Cores | 4 | 14 |

| Threads | 8 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45 | 65 |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not specified |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $134 | $255 |

| Part Number | SRPKDQ5CK | SRN44 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 89 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 44,889 |

Base clocks differ interestingly: the Core 3 201TE runs at 2.90 GHz base, higher than the i5-14600's 2.70 GHz base. However, the i5-14600's boost reaches 5.20 GHz versus 4.60 GHz, giving it a 0.6 GHz advantage under load. The TDP gap (45 versus 65) reflects the i5-14600's greater core count and sustained performance envelope.

The release dates show the Core 3 201TE launching after the i5-14600 by roughly a year. The database records the Core 3 201TE's production status as Active and the i5-14600's production status as Active, indicating both remain available. The i5-14600's nearest rivals cluster within a 1% performance band, confirming its competitive position among similarly scoring processors.