Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

The Intel Core 3 201TE and the Intel Core i5-14400T are both desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, yet they occupy different tiers of the product stack. The Core 3 201TE is a 4-core, 8-thread Bartlett Lake part, while the Core i5-14400T is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part. The recorded data shows a clear division of labor between the two: the Core i5-14400T dominates in multi-threaded workloads, while the Core 3 201TE maintains a slight edge in single-thread performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head test results for these two processors. However, the available data for the Intel Core i5-14400T provides a strong baseline for comparison. The Core i5-14400T achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17189 points, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 27166 confirms its position as a solid mid-range performer.

The Core i5-14400T shows particular strength in integer-heavy tasks. Its Passmark integer math score of 65667 demonstrates significant computational throughput. The floating-point math score of 49139 is also robust, indicating balanced execution units. Data compression performance reaches 235636 in the Passmark data compression test, while data encryption scores 13244.

The Core i5-14400T's multi-threaded capabilities are the primary differentiator. With 16 threads available, the processor leverages its larger core count effectively. The Passmark multithread score of 20223 reflects this advantage. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7219 and the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1732 both confirm the scaling advantage of having 10 physical cores versus 4.

Single-thread performance tells a different story. The Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Core i5-14400T has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Core 3 201TE's higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz versus 4.50 GHz suggests a slight advantage in lightly-threaded workloads. The Core i5-14400T's single-thread scores in the database include a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2426, a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1018, and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 244.

The Core 3 201TE has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, which limits direct quantitative comparisons. The Core i5-14400T's nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier. It sits 0.3% above the Intel Core i9-9900K in average score, 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, and 0.7% below the Intel Core i7-13700H. These deltas place the Core i5-14400T in a competitive position against older flagship and mid-range parts.

The Core i5-14400T also records a Passmark single-thread score of 3512. The Passmark physics score of 1244 and the Passmark extended instructions score of 14562 round out the available performance profile. The random string sorting score of 25181 shows strong memory and cache interaction in sorting workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14400T has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14400T has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Core i5-14400T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 3 201TE and the Intel Core i5-14400T support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T ranks at the 79th percentile. The Intel Core 3 201TE ranks at the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Intel Core i5-14400T uses the Raptor Lake-R codename with the Raptor Lake architecture. Both are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry, but the die sizes differ: the Core 3 201TE has a die size of 163 mm², while the Core i5-14400T has a die size of 215 mm².

The core configuration is the most significant architectural divergence. The Core 3 201TE uses 4 cores and 8 threads, a uniform layout without hybrid architecture. The Core i5-14400T uses 10 cores and 16 threads, which in the Raptor Lake design includes a mix of performance and efficiency cores. The database does not specify the exact performance and efficiency core split for the Core i5-14400T, but the total thread count of 16 with 10 physical cores indicates that some cores provide two threads each.

Cache hierarchies differ in capacity but not in per-core structure. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache is where the substantial difference appears: the Core 3 201TE has 12 MB shared, while the Core i5-14400T has 20 MB shared. The larger L3 cache on the Core i5-14400T provides more room for shared data across the additional cores.

Both processors integrate the UHD Graphics 730. They also share the same PCIe configuration: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The memory support is identical, with DDR4 and DDR5 options running in dual-channel mode. The Core 3 201TE has a listed memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core i5-14400T has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ substantially. The Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Base clock speeds differ by a wide margin. The Core 3 201TE runs at 2.90 GHz base, while the Core i5-14400T runs at 1.50 GHz base. Boost clocks are closer, with the Core 3 201TE at 4.60 GHz and the Core i5-14400T at 4.50 GHz.

Thermal design power differs by 10 watts. The Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core i5-14400T has a TDP of 35 watts. This makes the Core i5-14400T the lower-power part despite having more cores.

The L3 cache allocation is different. The Core 3 201TE has 12 MB shared, and the Core i5-14400T has 20 MB shared.

The die size is different. The Core 3 201TE measures 163 mm², while the Core i5-14400T measures 215 mm².

The release dates are different. The Core i5-14400T was released on 2024-01-07, while the Core 3 201TE was released on 2025-01-12.

The launch MSRP is different. The Core 3 201TE has a launch MSRP of $134, while the Core i5-14400T has a launch MSRP of $221.

The part numbers also differ: the Core 3 201TE uses part number SRPKDQ5CK, and the Core i5-14400T uses part number SRN3N.

The memory bandwidth specification is present only for the Core 3 201TE at 76.8 GB/s. The Core i5-14400T does not have a memory bandwidth figure in the database.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14400T is the stronger processor for multi-threaded workloads. Its 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with 20 MB of L3 cache, deliver substantial performance in parallel tasks. The recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17189 and the Passmark multithread score of 20223 confirm this advantage. The 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it well above the Core 3 201TE's 50th percentile ranking.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz compared to 4.50 GHz on the Core i5-14400T. This suggests a potential edge in single-threaded tasks, though no benchmark scores are recorded for the Core 3 201TE to quantify this advantage. The 4-core, 8-thread configuration with 12 MB of L3 cache positions it as a more modest processor overall.

The Core i5-14400T also comes with a lower TDP of 35 watts versus 45 watts for the Core 3 201TE, making it the more efficient choice in terms of power draw. The Core 3 201TE is the newer release, with a 2025 launch date compared to the 2024 launch of the Core i5-14400T.

For users who prioritize multi-threaded performance, the Core i5-14400T is the clear pick based on the benchmark data. For users who prioritize single-thread speed and a lower cost, the Core 3 201TE presents a more targeted option, but its lack of recorded benchmark results limits the strength of that recommendation.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400T wins in all multi-threaded scenarios. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1732, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7219, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17189 all reflect the advantage of having 10 cores and 16 threads. The Passmark multithread score of 20223 reinforces this position. The larger 20 MB L3 cache also benefits workloads that share substantial data across threads, such as data compression with a score of 235636 and integer math with a score of 65667.

The Intel Core 3 201TE wins in scenarios where clock speed matters more than core count. Its boost clock of 4.60 GHz exceeds the Core i5-14400T's 4.50 GHz. For lightly-threaded applications that rely on a single core reaching maximum frequency, the Core 3 201TE has a nominal advantage. Its higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus 1.50 GHz also means it maintains higher sustained performance in tasks that do not scale with additional cores.

The Core i5-14400T also wins in power efficiency, with a TDP of 35 watts compared to 45 watts for the Core 3 201TE. This makes the Core i5-14400T suitable for systems where thermal output is a concern, despite having more processing resources.

The Core 3 201TE wins in cost, with a launch MSRP of $134 compared to $221 for the Core i5-14400T. The Core 3 201TE also wins in die size efficiency, with a smaller 163 mm² die versus 215 mm².

For workloads that benefit from the Core i5-14400T's higher thread count, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the recorded benchmark scores show a clear advantage. For workloads that are latency-sensitive and single-threaded, such as certain legacy applications or specific game titles that do not use many cores, the Core 3 201TE's higher boost clock provides a potential edge, though the lack of recorded benchmark data for the Core 3 201TE prevents a definitive quantitative confirmation.