Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core 9 273PTE

The Intel Core 9 273PTE is the dominant processor in this comparison, delivering substantially higher performance across every measurable benchmark category. The Core 3 201TE, with its lower core count and smaller cache, serves a fundamentally different role within the same Bartlett Lake family. The recorded data shows the Core 9 273PTE outperforms the Core 3 201TE in all workload types, with the gap widening dramatically in multi-threaded and memory-intensive tasks. The Core 3 201TE has no benchmark entries in the database, while the Core 9 273PTE has a full suite of scores. This asymmetry means the analysis relies entirely on the Core 9 273PTE's recorded measurements, its percentile ranking, and the architectural specifications of both parts. The Core 3 201TE holds a 50th percentile versus all CPUs, while the Core 9 273PTE sits at the 82nd percentile, a clear indication of their relative standing in the broader market.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PTE wins in every workload category that has recorded data. There are no benchmark wins for the Core 3 201TE because no benchmark scores exist for that processor in the database. The Core 9 273PTE's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20445 points to strong sustained multi-threaded performance, suitable for rendering, compilation, and other parallel workloads. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2886 indicates robust single-thread performance as well, making it versatile across both lightly threaded and heavily threaded applications. In PassMark tests, the Core 9 273PTE achieves 24054 in multithread, 3433 in single thread, 82411 in integer math, 60673 in floating point math, and 258704 in data compression. These figures represent a processor that handles computational tasks with high throughput. The Core 3 201TE, by contrast, has no recorded scores to compare. Its 4 cores and 8 threads suggest a more limited capacity for parallel work, while its 2.90 GHz base clock and 4.60 GHz boost clock indicate it can still handle single-threaded tasks reasonably well. The Core 9 273PTE has a lower base clock of 1.40 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz, allowing it to reach higher peak speeds when needed. For users focused on multi-core performance, the Core 9 273PTE is the clear choice. For basic desktop tasks with light threading, the Core 3 201TE could suffice, but the data does not include any benchmarks to confirm its real-world performance levels.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Bartlett Lake codename and are built on Intel's 10 nm process node. They both use the Intel Socket 1700 and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, a threefold increase in core count and thread count. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core on both parts. The L2 cache differs: the Core 3 201TE has 1.25 MB per core, while the Core 9 273PTE has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major differentiator, with the Core 3 201TE offering 12 MB shared and the Core 9 273PTE offering 36 MB shared, a threefold difference that benefits the larger processor in workloads with large working sets. Memory bandwidth also differs, with the Core 3 201TE rated at 76.8 GB/s and the Core 9 273PTE at 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, a feature relevant for reliability-sensitive environments. The integrated graphics are the same, UHD Graphics 730 on both. PCIe support is identical as well, Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Core 3 201TE has a die size of 163 mm², while the Core 9 273PTE has no recorded die size. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either part. The Core 3 201TE was released on January 12, 2025, while the Core 9 273PTE was released on March 8, 2026. The production status for both is Active. The part numbers are SRPKDQ5CK for the Core 3 201TE and SA4QJ for the Core 9 273PTE. The launch MSRP for the Core 3 201TE is $134, and for the Core 9 273PTE it is $549. The market segment is Desktop for both.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Core 9 273PTE is the superior processor for almost any workload that benefits from multiple cores or high peak clock speeds. Its 12 cores and 24 threads provide a significant advantage in parallel processing, and its 36 MB of L3 cache supports larger datasets. The Core 3 201TE, with 4 cores and 8 threads, is positioned for lighter tasks where power efficiency and lower cost are priorities, though the database does not include benchmark scores to quantify its performance. The Core 9 273PTE's 82nd percentile ranking versus all CPUs places it well above the Core 3 201TE's 50th percentile. The Core 9 273PTE also has a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz compared to 4.60 GHz on the Core 3 201TE, meaning it can execute single-threaded tasks faster when boost is active. The Core 3 201TE does have a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus 1.40 GHz on the Core 9 273PTE, which may help in sustained low-load scenarios, but the Core 9 273PTE's boost capabilities outweigh this in most cases. Both processors support ECC memory and use the same socket, making platform compatibility similar. The Core 9 273PTE also has higher memory bandwidth, 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, which benefits memory-bound applications. The Core 3 201TE's smaller die size of 163 mm² may indicate lower manufacturing cost, but that is not a performance consideration. For users who need maximum performance, the Core 9 273PTE is the appropriate choice. For users with very light workloads, the Core 3 201TE could be adequate, but the lack of benchmark data means its performance profile is not verified in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two processors?

A: The Core 9 273PTE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the Core 3 201TE has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 3 201TE and the Intel Core 9 273PTE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the L3 cache size on each processor?

A: The Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor versus all CPUs?

A: The Core 3 201TE ranks at the 50th percentile, and the Core 9 273PTE ranks at the 82nd percentile.

Q: What are the release dates for these two processors?

A: The Core 3 201TE was released on January 12, 2025, and the Core 9 273PTE was released on March 8, 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core 9 273PTE has a full set of benchmark scores, while the Core 3 201TE has none. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison impossible in terms of measured results. However, the Core 9 273PTE's scores can be examined to understand its performance level. In Cinebench R15, the Core 9 273PTE scores 2060 in multicore and 290 in singlecore. In Cinebench R20, it scores 8586 in multicore and 1212 in singlecore. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20445 in multicore and 2886 in singlecore. These Cinebench results show strong scaling from R15 to R23, with multicore scores increasing significantly as the test becomes more demanding. The PassMark results for the Core 9 273PTE are as follows: data compression 258704, data encryption 14253, extended instructions 15952, find prime numbers 142, floating point math 60673, integer math 82411, multithread 24054, physics 1917, random string sorting 28973, and single thread 3433. The multithread score of 24054 and single thread score of 3433 indicate a balanced processor that performs well in both parallel and sequential tasks. The nearest rivals for the Core 9 273PTE in the database are the Intel Core i7-12700F with an average score of 31081 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS with an average score of 31074 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-13700TE with an average score of 31028 and a delta of 0.4 percent, and the Intel Core i7-12650HX with an average score of 31290 and a delta of negative 0.5 percent. These deltas are all within one percent, meaning the Core 9 273PTE performs essentially on par with these rivals. The Core 9 273PTE's average benchmark score is 31143. The Core 3 201TE has an average benchmark score of 0 due to the absence of recorded benchmarks. The Core 9 273PTE's performance in integer math, 82411, and floating point math, 60673, shows strong arithmetic capability. The data compression score of 258704 is particularly high, suggesting efficient handling of compression workloads. The encryption score of 14253 indicates moderate encryption throughput. The physics score of 1917 is relatively low compared to other metrics, which may reflect the specific nature of that test. The random string sorting score of 28973 shows reasonable sorting performance. The find prime numbers score of 142 is the lowest recorded score, which may indicate that this particular workload does not scale well with the processor's architecture. The extended instructions score of 15952 shows support for modern instruction sets. Overall, the Core 9 273PTE delivers consistent performance across a wide range of tests, while the Core 3 201TE remains unmeasured.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. Core count: the Core 3 201TE has 4 cores, the Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores. Thread count: 8 threads versus 24 threads. Base clock: 2.90 GHz versus 1.40 GHz. Boost clock: 4.60 GHz versus 5.50 GHz. L2 cache: 1.25 MB per core versus 2 MB per core. L3 cache: 12 MB shared versus 36 MB shared. Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. Die size: the Core 3 201TE is 163 mm², the Core 9 273PTE has no recorded die size. Release date: January 12, 2025 versus March 8, 2026. Launch MSRP: $134 versus $549. Part number: SRPKDQ5CK versus SA4QJ. Both processors share the same socket, Intel Socket 1700, the same process node, 10 nm, the same codename, Bartlett Lake, the same integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 730, the same memory support, DDR4 and DDR5, the same memory bus, dual-channel, the same PCIe configuration, Gen 5 with 16 lanes, the same ECC memory support, and both have locked multipliers. Both are Active in production status and target the Desktop market segment. The Core 3 201TE has a higher base clock, which may benefit idle or lightly loaded scenarios, while the Core 9 273PTE has a higher boost clock, which benefits peak performance. The Core 3 201TE has a smaller L3 cache and lower memory bandwidth, which could limit performance in memory-intensive applications. The Core 9 273PTE has a significantly larger L3 cache and higher memory bandwidth, which supports its higher core count. The lack of a recorded die size for the Core 9 273PTE prevents a direct comparison of physical dimensions, but the Core 3 201TE's 163 mm² die is recorded. Both processors are manufactured by Intel and use the Intel foundry. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not available. The Core 3 201TE's generation is listed as Core 3 (Bartlett Lake), and the Core 9 273PTE's generation is listed as Core 9 (Bartlett Lake). The series field is null for both. The transistors field is null for both. The total L3 field is null for both, and the vCache3d field is null for both. The architecture field is null for both. The Core 9 273PTE has an average benchmark score of 31143, while the Core 3 201TE has an average benchmark score of 0. The percentile rankings are 50 for the Core 3 201TE and 82 for the Core 9 273PTE. These specification differences illustrate a clear performance hierarchy within the same product family.