Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 253PE holds a dominant position over the Intel Core 3 201TE in every measurable performance category. The Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the Core 7 253PE delivers a substantial array of results across Cinebench and Passmark workloads. The Core 7 253PE achieves an average benchmark score of 40,557, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Core 3 201TE sits at the 50th percentile with no average score recorded.

The Core 7 253PE delivers 24,880 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with a single-core result of 3,512 points. The Core 3 201TE offers no comparable figures, so a direct numerical comparison is impossible from the recorded data. What the data does show is a processor with substantial multi-threaded throughput: 10,449 points in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 2,507 points in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core results of 1,475 in R20 and 354 in R15 indicate that the Core 7 253PE maintains strong per-thread performance alongside its parallel capabilities.

Passmark results reinforce this picture. The Core 7 253PE scores 114,158 in integer math, 80,870 in floating point math, and 21,806 in extended instructions. Multithreaded performance reaches 29,271 points, while single-thread performance lands at 3,955. Data compression scores 339,133, and encryption tasks complete at 18,385. Random string sorting hits 32,777, physics simulation scores 1,845, and prime number finding registers 138. Every one of these figures belongs exclusively to the Core 7 253PE, as the Core 3 201TE has no benchmark entries in the database.

The nearest rivals to the Core 7 253PE provide context for its standing. The Intel Core 5 223PE posts an average score of 40,585, a 0.1% difference from the Core 7 253PE. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40,518, also 0.1% away. The Intel Xeon 6357P delivers 40,630, trailing the Core 7 253PE by 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40,431, a 0.3% gap. These margins are narrow, meaning the Core 7 253PE trades places with its closest competitors depending on the exact workload mix, but the Core 3 201TE is not part of that competitive cluster.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Bartlett Lake codename and use Intel's 10 nm process node, with Intel as the foundry for each. The Core 3 201TE is a 4-core, 8-thread part, while the Core 7 253PE doubles the core count to 10 and offers 20 threads. That difference in parallel resources explains much of the performance gap in multi-threaded workloads.

Cache configurations differ sharply. The Core 3 201TE provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The Core 7 253PE also provides 80 KB of L1 per core but increases L2 to 2 MB per core and triples the shared L3 to 33 MB. The larger shared cache on the Core 7 253PE gives it more headroom for data-heavy workloads that benefit from frequent cache hits.

Clock speeds also separate the two. The Core 3 201TE runs at a base clock of 2.90 GHz with a boost of 4.60 GHz. The Core 7 253PE starts lower at 2.50 GHz base but boosts higher to 5.50 GHz. The Core 7 253PE therefore has a 0.90 GHz higher boost ceiling, which contributes to its single-threaded advantages.

Thermal design power differs as well. The Core 3 201TE carries a 45 W TDP, while the Core 7 253PE operates at 65 W. The higher TDP on the Core 7 253PE aligns with its additional cores, larger cache, and higher boost clock. Both processors fit the Intel Socket 1700, so they are socket-compatible with each other on paper.

Memory support is identical in type: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. However, the memory bandwidth differs. The Core 3 201TE delivers 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 253PE reaches 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, which matters for stability-sensitive workloads. PCIe connectivity is the same for both: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics are identical: UHD Graphics 730 on both processors. Neither has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a distinguishing factor. The die size for the Core 3 201TE is 163 mm², while the Core 7 253PE has no die size recorded in the database.

Release timing separates the pair. The Core 3 201TE entered production on 2025-01-12, while the Core 7 253PE followed on 2026-03-08. Both remain active in production. The part numbers differ: SRPKDQ5CK for the Core 3 201TE and SA4QE for the Core 7 253PE.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 7 253PE wins every category where data exists. Multi-threaded workloads are its strongest domain. The 10-core, 20-thread configuration, 33 MB of L3, and 5.50 GHz boost clock combine to produce class-leading results in Cinebench R23, R20, and R15 multi-core tests. Passmark multithread, integer math, floating point math, and data compression all show the same pattern: the Core 7 253PE handles parallel tasks with ease.

Single-threaded performance also favors the Core 7 253PE. Its boost clock of 5.50 GHz exceeds the Core 3 201TE's 4.60 GHz ceiling, and the recorded single-core scores confirm this advantage. The 3,955 single-thread Passmark result and 3,512 Cinebench R23 single-core score demonstrate strong per-core capability.

The Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark wins because it has no recorded benchmarks. Its 45 W TDP suggests lower power consumption in sustained workloads, but the database contains no power measurements to confirm this. Its 4-core, 8-thread layout and 12 MB L3 cache position it as a more modest desktop part, but the absence of scores means the database cannot quantify its strengths relative to the Core 7 253PE.

Workloads that benefit from the Core 7 253PE's larger cache and higher memory bandwidth include data compression, encryption, and random string sorting. The 339,133 data compression score and 18,385 encryption score indicate strong throughput in these areas. The 32,777 random string sorting score and 1,845 physics score round out a versatile profile. The Core 7 253PE also scores 21,806 in extended instructions, which covers workloads that use advanced CPU instruction sets.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 201PE boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 3 201TE and the Intel Core 7 253PE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the L3 cache capacity on each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 253PE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Are the integrated graphics the same on both processors?

A: Yes, both processors use UHD Graphics 730.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 253PE compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Core 7 253PE scores 40,557 on average. The Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40,585, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40,518, also a 0.1% difference. The Intel Xeon 6357P scores 40,630, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40,431, a 0.3% difference.

The Verdict

The data points clearly to the Intel Core 7 253PE as the stronger processor. It holds the 87th percentile position among all CPUs in the database, while the Core 3 201TE sits at the 50th percentile. The Core 7 253PE delivers 10 cores and 20 threads against the Core 3 201TE's 4 cores and 8 threads. Its 33 MB of L3 cache, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 5.50 GHz boost clock give it advantages in both parallel and single-threaded work.

The Core 3 201TE is a lower-power part at 45 W TDP, which may suit systems where thermal constraints matter. Its 12 MB L3 cache and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth are smaller figures than the Core 7 253PE's, but the lack of benchmark data means its real-world behavior cannot be assessed from the database. The Core 7 253PE, by contrast, has a full suite of scores that place it within a narrow competitive band around the Intel Core 5 223PE, Intel Core Ultra X7 368H, Intel Xeon 6357P, and AMD Ryzen 9 7940H.

The Core 7 253PE is the appropriate choice for workloads that demand multi-threaded performance, large cache capacity, and high memory bandwidth. The Core 3 201TE is a lower-specification part with no recorded performance data, so its suitability cannot be measured against the Core 7 253PE. The launch MSRP for the Core 3 201TE is $134, and the launch MSRP for the Core 7 253PE is $384.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 3 201TE | Intel Core 7 253PE |

|----------------|--------------------|--------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 10 |

| Threads | 8 | 20 |

| Base clock | 2.90 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| L2 cache | 1.25 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 12 MB shared | 33 MB shared |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| Die size | 163 mm² | Not recorded |

| Release date | 2025-01-12 | 2026-03-08 |

| Part number | SRPKDQ5CK | SA4QE |

Shared specifications include Intel Socket 1700, Bartlett Lake codename, 10 nm process node, Intel foundry, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, ECC memory support, Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics, desktop market segment, active production status, and locked multipliers.