Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the Intel Core 3 201TE or the Intel Core 7 150HL. Both processors have an average benchmark score of zero, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. Consequently, there are no measured wins for either part in any workload category. The absence of data means no direct performance comparison can be drawn from our measurements. The percentile ranking for both CPUs is identical at 50, placing each in the median position relative to all CPUs in the database. Without recorded scores, the head-to-head section relies entirely on architectural and specification-based inference rather than empirical results.

The Core 7 150HL shows a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz compared to the Core 3 201TE's 4.60 GHz, a difference of 0.40 GHz. The Core 3 201TE has a higher base clock at 2.90 GHz versus 2.40 GHz on the Core 7 150HL, a gap of 0.50 GHz. These clock figures suggest different operating characteristics, but without benchmark data, their real-world impact remains unquantified. The Core 7 150HL also possesses a larger core count and thread count, which typically translates to higher multi-threaded throughput, yet no scores confirm this expectation.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename and belongs to the Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS) generation. Both are built on a 10 nm process node by Intel's foundry, so the manufacturing technology is identical.

Core configuration differs significantly. The Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads, indicating a conventional layout with hyper-threading on all cores. The Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. This core-to-thread ratio of 14 to 20 implies a hybrid arrangement, likely combining performance cores with efficiency cores, where only a subset supports hyper-threading. The database does not specify the exact split, but the thread count confirms a heterogeneous design.

Cache hierarchies diverge as well. Both CPUs share an L1 cache of 80 KB per core. The L2 cache differs: the Core 3 201TE has 1.25 MB per core, while the Core 7 150HL has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a substantial gap, with the Core 3 201TE offering 12 MB shared versus 24 MB shared on the Core 7 150HL. This doubling of L3 cache gives the Core 7 150HL a larger pool for frequently accessed data.

Memory support matches on both parts: DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The Core 3 201TE specifies a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 150HL does not list a bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory support also differs: the Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory, whereas the Core 7 150HL does not.

PCIe connectivity shows a notable divergence. The Core 3 201TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 150HL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This means the Core 3 201TE has both a newer PCIe generation and double the lane count, which can benefit bandwidth-intensive peripherals.

Integrated graphics differ substantially. The Core 3 201TE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 150HL includes Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The Iris Xe part, with its 96 execution units, is positioned as a more capable integrated GPU, though the database provides no performance numbers for either.

Both chips fit the same Intel Socket 1700 and have a TDP of 45 watts. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 3 201TE has a die size of 163 mm², while the Core 7 150HL does not list a die size. The Core 3 201TE has a part number of SRPKDQ5CK; the Core 7 150HL lists its part number as unknown.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark data, the analysis of where each processor wins must rely on the recorded specifications. The Core 7 150HL holds advantages in core count, thread count, boost clock, L2 cache per core, L3 cache, and integrated graphics. These attributes point toward workloads that scale with parallel execution and larger cache residency. Multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks typically benefit from more cores and threads. The higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz also supports single-thread responsiveness in lightly threaded applications.

The Core 3 201TE counters with a higher base clock, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and a known memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The base clock advantage of 2.90 GHz versus 2.40 GHz suggests sustained throughput in workloads that run at base frequencies for extended periods. ECC memory support matters for environments requiring error correction, such as certain server or workstation deployments. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes offers double the lane count and a newer generation, which can drive high-speed SSDs or GPUs at full bandwidth.

The Core 3 201TE also has a production status of Active and a release date of 2025-01-12, while the Core 7 150HL is also Active but released earlier on 2024-04-07. The Core 3 201TE has a launch MSRP of $134, while the Core 7 150HL has no launch MSRP recorded.

In summary, the Core 7 150HL appears better suited for heavily threaded, cache-sensitive workloads, while the Core 3 201TE offers advantages in platform features like ECC, PCIe generation, and lane count, plus a higher base clock.

Specification Differences

The following table summarizes the recorded differences between the two processors:

| Specification | Intel Core 3 201TE | Intel Core 7 150HL |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 14 |

| Threads | 8 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) | Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Architecture | Not listed | Raptor Lake |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | Not listed |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-04-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $134 | Not listed |

| Part Number | SRPKDQ5CK | unknown |

Shared specifications include the manufacturer (Intel), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), L1 cache (80 KB per core), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (Dual-channel), socket (Intel Socket 1700), TDP (45 watts), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), and multiplier unlock status (false).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Core 7 150HL boosts to 5.00 GHz, and the Core 3 201TE boosts to 4.60 GHz. The Core 7 150HL has a 0.40 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The Core 3 201TE lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 150HL does not list one.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory. The Core 7 150HL does not support ECC memory.

Q: How does PCIe connectivity differ?

A: The Core 3 201TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Core 7 150HL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor include?

A: The Core 3 201TE includes UHD Graphics 730. The Core 7 150HL includes Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes, both have an Active production status.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two distinct positioning strategies within the same socket and TDP envelope. The Intel Core 7 150HL delivers a much higher core and thread count, a faster boost clock, larger caches, and more capable integrated graphics. For workloads that use many threads or benefit from a large shared L3 cache, this processor is the stronger choice based on its specifications.

The Intel Core 3 201TE offers a higher base clock, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 with double the lane count, and a known memory bandwidth figure. For applications that rely on sustained base-clock operation, error-correcting memory, or high-bandwidth PCIe devices, this processor provides platform-level advantages.

Because the database contains no benchmark scores for either part, the verdict rests on specification analysis rather than measured performance. The Core 7 150HL is the logical pick for multi-threaded compute and graphics-heavy tasks. The Core 3 201TE is the logical pick for ECC-enabled systems and PCIe Gen 5 expansion. Both parts share the same 45-watt TDP and Socket 1700, making platform compatibility identical.

The Core 3 201TE has a launch MSRP of $134, while the Core 7 150HL has no recorded launch MSRP. The release dates differ by roughly nine months, with the Core 3 201TE arriving later. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor.

In the absence of empirical benchmark results, the architecture details provide the only basis for selection. The Core 7 150HL's hybrid core layout and doubled L3 cache point to a processor designed for throughput. The Core 3 201TE's ECC support and newer PCIe generation point to a processor designed for stability and connectivity. Users should weigh these recorded differences against their specific workload requirements.