Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core 5 315 Comparison

Intel Core 3 201TE and Intel Core 5 315 are two very different processors aimed at different segments. The Core 3 201TE is a 45 W desktop part on Intel Socket 1700, while the Core 5 315 is a 15 W mobile chip on Intel BGA 1516. The database shows a clear split in capability: the Core 5 315 has all recorded benchmark scores, while the Core 3 201TE has none. This means the comparison relies entirely on the Core 5 315's measured results and the architectural specifications of both parts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core 5 315 posts a substantial set of benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, it scores 12981 in multi-core and 1832 in single-core. The multi-core result places it comfortably above many desktop processors from a few generations back. In Cinebench R20, the Core 5 315 scores 5452 multi-core and 769 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 1308 multi-core and 184 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that handles both threaded and single-threaded workloads competently.

PassMark results for the Core 5 315 are equally informative. The single-thread score is 4021, with data compression at 146143 and data encryption at 11119. Floating point math reaches 42441, integer math hits 31690, and extended instructions score 13143. Random string sorting produces 17551, while find prime numbers yields 112. The multithread score is 15272, and physics lands at 1163. The average benchmark score for the Core 5 315 is 18188, with a percentile rank of 72 across all CPUs. This means it outperforms roughly 72 percent of all recorded processors in the database.

Since the Core 3 201TE has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The database records zero wins for the Core 3 201TE and zero wins for the Core 5 315, simply because no direct comparison tests exist. However, the Core 5 315's nearest rivals provide context. It sits within 0.1 percent of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U and Intel Core i7-1365U, and within 0 percent of the AMD EPYC 9274F and Intel Core i7-9700. The Core 5 315 essentially matches these four processors in average score, which is notable for a 15 W mobile chip competing with desktop and server parts.

Architecture Differences

The Core 3 201TE uses Bartlett Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, with a die size of 163 mm². It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Core 5 315 uses Wildcat Lake architecture on a 3 nm process, with no recorded die size. It has 6 cores but only 6 threads, meaning no hyper-threading. Its base clock is 1.50 GHz and boost clock is 4.40 GHz.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The Core 3 201TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 315 has 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 3 201TE's larger L3 cache likely benefits workloads that repeatedly access a large working set, while the Core 5 315's smaller cache may be sufficient for its target mobile workloads.

Memory support also diverges. The Core 3 201TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and ECC support. The Core 5 315 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in single-channel mode, with a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s and no ECC. The Core 3 201TE offers higher bandwidth and more flexible memory options, while the Core 5 315 is limited to single-channel but gains low-power LPDDR5X support.

PCIe configurations differ as well. The Core 3 201TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Core 5 315 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes. The Core 3 201TE's PCIe Gen 5 support is a clear advantage for desktop expansion, while the Core 5 315's fewer lanes suit a mobile platform. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 3 201TE versus Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores on the Core 5 315.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Core 5 315 is the faster processor in every measured benchmark. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12981 and single-core score of 1832 are strong numbers for a 15 W mobile chip. The Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmarks, so the database offers no evidence that it can match those results. The Core 5 315's average benchmark score of 18188 places it at the 72nd percentile, which is a solid position for a mobile processor.

The Core 3 201TE, however, is not without merits. It offers a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz versus 4.40 GHz on the Core 5 315, and it has a larger L3 cache of 12 MB versus 6 MB. It also supports dual-channel memory with ECC and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. These features make it a viable desktop processor for memory-sensitive or expansion-heavy builds, even if benchmark scores are unavailable.

For raw performance, the Core 5 315 is the clear pick based on recorded data. For desktop features and memory flexibility, the Core 3 201TE has advantages. The choice depends on whether the user prioritizes measured speed or platform capabilities.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 315 has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Core 5 315?

A: The Core 5 315 has an average benchmark score of 18188, placing it at the 72nd percentile across all CPUs.

Q: Does the Core 3 201TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory. The Core 5 315 does not support ECC.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core 5 315 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The Core 3 201TE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s in dual-channel mode. The Core 5 315 has a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s in single-channel mode.

Q: Which processor has a smaller process node?

A: The Core 5 315 uses a 3 nm process, while the Core 3 201TE uses a 10 nm process.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 315 wins on every recorded benchmark. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12981 and single-core score of 1832 show strong performance in both threaded and single-threaded workloads. PassMark results confirm this across a range of tasks, from data compression at 146143 to floating point math at 42441. The Core 5 315's 72nd percentile rank and average score of 18188 make it the superior choice for any workload where measured performance matters.

The Core 3 201TE wins on platform features. It has a higher boost clock at 4.60 GHz, more L3 cache at 12 MB, dual-channel memory support with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, ECC capability, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. These features benefit desktop builds that need memory capacity, error correction, or high-speed expansion. The Core 3 201TE also uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a common desktop platform, while the Core 5 315 uses Intel BGA 1516, a mobile socket.

For users building a desktop system with specific memory or expansion requirements, the Core 3 201TE's specifications are more accommodating. For users who want the fastest possible processor based on available benchmark data, the Core 5 315 is the clear winner.

Specification Differences

The Core 3 201TE and Core 5 315 differ in nearly every specification. The Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core 5 315 has 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks are 2.90 GHz versus 1.50 GHz, and boost clocks are 4.60 GHz versus 4.40 GHz. The Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 W, while the Core 5 315 has a TDP of 15 W.

Sockets differ completely: Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 3 201TE versus Intel BGA 1516 for the Core 5 315. The process node is 10 nm for the Core 3 201TE and 3 nm for the Core 5 315. Cache sizes differ, with the Core 3 201TE having 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3, while the Core 5 315 has 192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs: the Core 3 201TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC, while the Core 5 315 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in single-channel mode with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC. PCIe differs, with the Core 3 201TE offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes and the Core 5 315 offering Gen 4 with 6 lanes. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 3 201TE versus Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores on the Core 5 315. Release dates also differ, with the Core 3 201TE launching on 2025-01-12 and the Core 5 315 on 2026-04-15. The launch MSRP for the Core 3 201TE is $134, and for the Core 5 315 it is $340.