Intel Core 3 201E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 Comparison

Intel Core 3 201E and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 represent two fundamentally different approaches to processing, one aimed at desktop efficiency and the other at mobile integration. The data in the database shows a clear split: the Intel part has a substantial set of benchmark results, while the Qualcomm part has no recorded scores in our measurements. This asymmetry shapes the entire comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. The Intel Core 3 201E has a full suite of recorded scores, including Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 results, plus multiple Passmark tests. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has zero benchmark entries across all test categories.

For the Intel Core 3 201E, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12613, with a single-core score of 1780. The Cinebench R20 results show 5297 multicore and 747 single-core. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 1271 and single-core is 179. These figures place the Intel part at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19056.

The Passmark suite for the Intel Core 3 201E shows a multithread score of 14839 and a single-thread score of 3482. Integer math scores 43894, floating-point math scores 33260, and extended instructions score 11035. Data compression reaches 164160, data encryption scores 8931, and random string sorting hits 17783. Physics simulation scores 1141, while find prime numbers scores 57.

Since the Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has no recorded benchmarks, its average score is 0, and it sits at the 50th percentile by default. The nearest rivals for the Intel part provide useful context: the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has an average score of 19047 with a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i5-12400F scores 19039 with a 0.1 percent delta, the Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18982 with a 0.4 percent delta, and the AMD EPYC 7773X scores 18979 with a 0.4 percent delta. The Intel Core 3 201E effectively matches these processors, sitting within 0.4 percent of all four.

Without any benchmark data for the Qualcomm part, no direct score comparisons can be made. The database records no wins for either processor in head-to-head tests, as none exist.

FAQ

Q: Why does the Intel Core 3 201E have benchmark scores while the Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has none?

A: The database contains a complete benchmark suite for the Intel Core 3 201E, including Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and nine Passmark tests. The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has an empty benchmark array, meaning no scores have been recorded for it in our measurements.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19056. The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has an average benchmark score of 0, because it has no recorded benchmark results.

Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has 10 cores and 10 threads, indicating no simultaneous multithreading on the Qualcomm part.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 supports LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s.

Q: What are the process nodes for these processors?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E supports ECC memory, while the Snapdragon X1P-64-100 does not.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 3 201E is built on the Bartlett Lake architecture, part of the Core 3 generation. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel and has a die size of 163 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730. This is a desktop segment processor with an Intel Socket 1700.

The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 uses the Oryon codename from the Snapdragon X Plus generation. It is built on a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The cache design differs significantly: 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Adreno X1-85. This is a mobile segment processor with a Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket.

The Intel part has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Snapdragon has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no recorded boost clock. Thermal design power differs substantially: the Intel part is rated at 60 watts, while the Snapdragon is rated at 35 watts. The Intel part has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Snapdragon has 10 cores and 10 threads. The Intel part supports ECC memory; the Snapdragon does not. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes; the Snapdragon uses PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes.

The release dates show the Snapdragon launched first, with a release date in April 2024, while the Intel part followed in January 2025. Both parts are currently marked as active in production.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear choice only for the Intel Core 3 201E, because it has complete benchmark coverage. The Intel part delivers a multicore Cinebench R23 score of 12613 and a single-core score of 1780. Its Passmark multithread score of 14839 and single-thread score of 3482 indicate solid performance across both threaded and single-threaded workloads. The 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it above the median, and its average score of 19056 closely tracks the nearest rivals, all within 0.4 percent.

The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 cannot be evaluated for performance from the database because it has no recorded benchmark scores. Its 50th percentile ranking and average score of 0 reflect this absence of data, not actual performance characteristics. The architecture differences are notable: the Snapdragon has more cores (10 versus 4) and a smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm), but these specifications do not translate into measurable performance in the database.

For users requiring verified performance data, the Intel Core 3 201E is the only option with recorded results. Its cache configuration includes a larger shared L3 (12 MB versus 6 MB) and per-core L2 (1.25 MB versus 12 MB per module on the Snapdragon, which is not directly comparable). The Intel part also offers ECC memory support, which the Snapdragon lacks, and higher PCIe bandwidth with Gen 5 and 16 lanes versus Gen 4 and 12 lanes.

The Snapdragon part has advantages in memory bandwidth (135.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s), power efficiency (35 watts versus 60 watts), and process node (4 nm versus 10 nm). It also has a higher L1 cache per core (288 KB versus 80 KB). However, without benchmark scores, these specifications cannot be confirmed as performance advantages in practice.

The data indicates the Intel Core 3 201E is the processor with demonstrated performance in the database. The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 remains an unverified entry with architectural merits but no recorded test results.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has 10 cores and 10 threads. Base clocks are 3.60 GHz for Intel and 3.40 GHz for Qualcomm. The Intel part has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz; the Snapdragon has no boost clock recorded. Thermal design power is 60 watts for Intel and 35 watts for Qualcomm. The Intel socket is Intel Socket 1700; the Qualcomm socket is Qualcomm BGA 2073.

Process nodes differ: Intel uses 10 nm from its own foundry, while Qualcomm uses 4 nm from TSMC. Die size is 163 mm² for Intel, with no die size recorded for Qualcomm. Cache configurations differ: Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. Qualcomm has 288 KB L1 per core, 12 MB L2 per module, and 6 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, Qualcomm supports LPDDR5X only. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for Intel and 135.2 GB/s for Qualcomm. ECC memory is supported on Intel but not on Qualcomm. PCIe configuration differs: Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes, Qualcomm uses Gen 4 with 12 lanes. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 for Intel and Adreno X1-85 for Qualcomm.

Market segments differ: Intel is desktop, Qualcomm is mobile. Release dates are January 2025 for Intel and April 2024 for Qualcomm. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $134, while the Qualcomm part has no recorded launch MSRP. Both processors have locked multipliers. Part numbers are SRVTR for Intel and X1P64100 for Qualcomm. The Intel manufacturer is Intel; the Qualcomm manufacturer is listed as unknown in the database.