Intel Core 3 201E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 Comparison
Intel Core 3 201E
Snapdragon X1E-80-100
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 3 201E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core benchmark score in Cinebench R23?
A: The Intel Core 3 201E records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12613. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no direct comparison is possible for this metric.
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?
A: The Intel Core 3 201E has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.
Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?
A: The Intel Core 3 201E is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The Intel Core 3 201E supports ECC memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 does not support ECC memory.
Q: What is the market segment for each processor?
A: The Intel Core 3 201E is a Desktop processor. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 is a Mobile processor.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 3 201E wins in every measurable benchmark category because the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 lacks any recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Intel chip produces a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1271, a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5297, and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12613. Single-core results show a Cinebench R15 score of 179, a Cinebench R20 score of 747, and a Cinebench R23 score of 1780.
PassMark results further solidify the Intel processor's position. The data compression score is 164160, the data encryption score is 8931, and the extended instructions score is 11035. Integer math scores reach 43894, floating point math reaches 33260, and the find prime numbers test records 57. The multithread score is 14839, physics scores 1141, and random string sorting scores 17783. Single-thread performance is recorded at 3482.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has an average benchmark score of 0, while the Intel Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19056. The Intel chip also holds a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, whereas the Qualcomm chip sits at the 50th percentile. For any workload that relies on these measured metrics, the Intel Core 3 201E is the only option with verified performance data.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 uses the Oryon codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Elite) generation. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC.
Core configurations differ significantly. The Intel chip has 4 cores with 8 threads, supporting simultaneous multithreading. The Qualcomm chip has 12 cores with 12 threads, meaning each core handles a single thread. Cache hierarchies also diverge. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm processor provides 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.
Memory architecture shows another split. The Intel Core 3 201E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 supports LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is present on the Intel chip but absent on the Qualcomm chip.
PCIe connectivity differs as well. The Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Qualcomm chip uses Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Qualcomm chip uses Adreno X1-85.
The die size for the Intel processor is 163 mm², while the Qualcomm processor has no recorded die size. The socket types are entirely different, with Intel using Socket 1700 and Qualcomm using BGA 2073. The Intel processor has a power draw of 60 watts TDP, while the Qualcomm processor has a power draw of 35 watts TDP.
Specification Differences
The Intel Core 3 201E and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 differ across nearly every specification field. Core count: 4 versus 12. Thread count: 8 versus 12. Base clock: 3.60 GHz versus 3.40 GHz. Boost clock: 4.80 GHz versus 4.00 GHz. TDP: 60 watts versus 35 watts.
The process node is 10 nm for Intel and 4 nm for Qualcomm. The foundry is Intel for the former and TSMC for the latter. The Intel die size is 163 mm², while the Qualcomm die size is not recorded. L1 cache per core is 80 KB versus 288 KB. L2 cache per core is 1.25 MB for Intel, while Qualcomm lists 12 MB per module. L3 cache is 12 MB shared for Intel and 6 MB shared for Qualcomm.
Memory support: DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel, LPDDR5X for Qualcomm. Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s versus 135.2 GB/s. ECC memory: true for Intel, false for Qualcomm. PCIe: Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel, Gen 4 with 12 lanes for Qualcomm. Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 730 versus Adreno X1-85. Market segment: Desktop versus Mobile. Socket: Intel Socket 1700 versus Qualcomm BGA 2073.
The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $134. The Qualcomm processor has no recorded launch MSRP. The Intel part number is SRVTR, while the Qualcomm part number is X1E80100. The Intel release date is 2025-01-12, and the Qualcomm release date is 2024-04-23. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the wins counter shows zero for both processors. This means the database contains no direct comparison results between the Intel Core 3 201E and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100. The Qualcomm chip has no benchmark entries at all, which prevents any side-by-side performance evaluation.
The Intel Core 3 201E does have a full benchmark profile. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 1271 and the single-core score is 179. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 5297 and the single-core score is 747. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 12613 and the single-core score is 1780.
PassMark results for the Intel chip show a multithread score of 14839 and a single-thread score of 3482. The data compression test records 164160, data encryption records 8931, and extended instructions records 11035. Integer math reaches 43894, floating point math reaches 33260, and the find prime numbers test records 57. Physics scores 1141, and random string sorting scores 17783.
The average benchmark score for the Intel chip is 19056, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19047 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i5-12400F with an average score of 19039 and a delta of 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i5-1335U with an average score of 18982 and a delta of 0.4 percent, and the AMD EPYC 7773X with an average score of 18979 and a delta of 0.4 percent. The Intel Core 3 201E sits at the top of this cluster, slightly ahead of all four rivals in average score.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. With no benchmark data, the database cannot validate any performance claims for this processor. The Intel chip delivers measurable results across every test in its profile.
The Verdict
The Intel Core 3 201E is the clear choice for any user who requires verified benchmark performance. The recorded data shows strong multi-core and single-core scores across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, plus a comprehensive set of PassMark results. The 73rd percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 19056 indicate solid performance relative to the broader CPU landscape.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 offers a different feature set on paper, including 12 cores, a 4 nm process, and higher memory bandwidth. However, the absence of any benchmark scores in the database means there is no measured evidence of its performance. The 50th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 0 reflect this lack of data rather than any actual performance level.
For desktop workloads where benchmark results matter, the Intel Core 3 201E is the only processor in this comparison with verified performance numbers. Its 4.80 GHz boost clock, 12 MB shared L3 cache, and ECC memory support make it suitable for tasks that benefit from validated single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Qualcomm chip may have architectural advantages in power efficiency given its 35 watt TDP and 4 nm process, but the database contains no measurements to confirm real-world results.
The Intel processor also offers a launch MSRP of $134, while the Qualcomm processor has no recorded price. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility in platform choices, whereas the Qualcomm chip is limited to LPDDR5X. Users seeking a desktop processor with an established benchmark profile should select the Intel Core 3 201E. Users considering the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 should note that its performance remains unverified in the database.