Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 3 201E and the Intel Core Ultra 7 165UL. The Core 3 201E has a full set of recorded measurements, while the Core Ultra 7 165UL has no benchmark entries at all. This absence of comparative data means the two processors cannot be ranked against each other through direct testing.

What the recorded data does show is where the Core 3 201E stands among other CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 19056 places it in the 73rd percentile of all processors in the database. The nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19047, the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19039, the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18982, and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18979. The delta percentages are minimal: 0 percent, 0.1 percent, 0.4 percent, and 0.4 percent respectively. This indicates the Core 3 201E sits in a tightly clustered performance band where the differences between these four processors are effectively negligible.

Looking at the Core 3 201E's individual benchmark scores, the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 12613 and single-core result of 1780 demonstrate its compute capability. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 14839 and a single-thread score of 3482. Data compression reaches 164160, integer math hits 43894, floating point math reaches 33260, and extended instructions score 11035. The randomness of string sorting produces 17783, while find prime numbers yields only 57. Physics workloads score 1141, and data encryption records 8931.

For the Core Ultra 7 165UL, the absence of benchmark scores in the database means no performance claims can be made from measurements. Its percentile ranking of 50 and average score of 0 reflect this missing data rather than actual performance levels. The Core 3 201E's 73rd percentile ranking is therefore the only percentile figure available for comparison, and it is not directly comparable to the Ultra 7 165UL's 50th percentile since the latter lacks supporting data.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head benchmarks, the win analysis relies on the architectural specifications recorded in the database. The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165UL has 12 cores and 14 threads. The thread count difference of 6 additional threads on the Ultra 7 suggests potential advantages in heavily parallel workloads, but no benchmark data confirms this.

Clock speeds favor the Core 3 201E in base frequency: 3.60 GHz versus 1.70 GHz. The boost clocks are closer, with the Core 3 201E reaching 4.80 GHz and the Ultra 7 165UL reaching 4.90 GHz. For single-threaded tasks that rely on sustained base frequency, the Core 3 201E holds an advantage. For short bursts of activity, the Ultra 7's slightly higher boost clock could matter, but again, no measurements verify this.

The power envelope differs substantially. The Core 3 201E has a TDP of 60, while the Ultra 7 165UL has a TDP of 15. This fourfold difference in thermal design power points to very different operating characteristics. The lower TDP of the Ultra 7 165UL suggests it is designed for constrained thermal environments, while the Core 3 201E's higher TDP allows for more sustained performance delivery.

Memory bandwidth favors the Ultra 7 165UL at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Core 3 201E. This 12.8 GB/s difference could benefit memory-intensive applications on the Ultra 7, though the Core 3 201E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory while the Ultra 7's support is listed as DDR5 depending on the motherboard.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. The Core Ultra 7 165UL uses the Meteor Lake architecture with the Meteor Lake-PS codename and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1 generation. These are distinct designs with different implementation strategies.

The manufacturing process differs by node size. The Core 3 201E is built on a 10 nm process, while the Ultra 7 165UL uses a 7 nm process. Both are fabricated by Intel, but the smaller node of the Ultra 7 allows for denser transistor packing. The die size for the Core 3 201E is 163 mm², while the Ultra 7's die size is not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies show structural differences. The Core 3 201E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The Ultra 7 165UL has 112 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. Both share 12 MB of L3 cache. The per-core L1 and L2 allocations are larger on the Ultra 7, which can reduce latency for frequently accessed data within each core.

Socket compatibility separates the two entirely. The Core 3 201E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 7 165UL uses Intel Socket 1851. These are physically incompatible sockets, meaning motherboard selection determines which processor can be installed. The PCIe configuration also differs: the Core 3 201E supports Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 7 165UL supports Gen 4 with 8 lanes. This gives the Core 3 201E a substantial advantage in available PCIe bandwidth and generation.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 3 201E includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Ultra 7 165UL includes Arc Xe-LPG 64EU. The Arc branding suggests a more capable graphics solution, but no graphics benchmarks exist in the database to quantify this.

Memory support shows another split. The Core 3 201E supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 7 165UL supports DDR5 with the caveat that support depends on the motherboard. ECC memory is supported on the Core 3 201E but not on the Ultra 7 165UL. This makes the Core 3 201E more suitable for reliability-focused workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 165UL has 12 cores and 14 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Core 3 201E has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 165UL has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How does the thermal design power compare between the two?

A: The Core 3 201E has a TDP of 60, while the Core Ultra 7 165UL has a TDP of 15.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Core 3 201E supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 7 165UL supports DDR5, with support depending on the motherboard.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: Both processors have 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19056. The Core Ultra 7 165UL has no recorded benchmark scores, so its average is 0.

The Verdict

The data in the database presents an incomplete picture for direct comparison. The Core 3 201E has extensive benchmark results, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 19056. Its nearest rivals score nearly identically, with deltas of 0 to 0.4 percent, indicating this processor performs on par with the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, Intel Core i5-12400F, Intel Core i5-1335U, and AMD EPYC 7773X.

The Core Ultra 7 165UL has no benchmark measurements, making performance assessment impossible from recorded data. Its specifications suggest a different design philosophy: 12 cores, 14 threads, a low 15 TDP, and a 1.70 GHz base clock. This combination points toward efficiency-focused operation rather than raw throughput.

For users who require ECC memory support, DDR4 compatibility, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, the Core 3 201E offers those features. Its 73rd percentile ranking confirms it performs competitively within the broader CPU landscape. The launch MSRP is $134.

For users who prioritize lower power consumption, a smaller process node, and higher memory bandwidth, the Core Ultra 7 165UL presents those characteristics. Its 12-core configuration and 14 threads provide a higher theoretical parallel capacity. The launch MSRP is $447.

The choice between these two depends on which specifications matter more. The Core 3 201E delivers measured performance with a proven benchmark profile. The Core Ultra 7 165UL offers architectural advantages in node size, core count, and bandwidth, but without benchmark data, its actual performance remains unverified in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 3 201E | Intel Core Ultra 7 165UL |

|---|---|---|

| Series | None listed | Core Ultra Series 1 |

| Cores | 4 | 12 |

| Threads | 8 | 14 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 1.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 60 | 15 |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Meteor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) | Ultra 7 (Meteor Lake-PS) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, depends on motherboard |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc Xe-LPG 64EU |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-04-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $134 | $447 |

| Part Number | SRVTR | SRN95 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 73 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 19056 | 0 |