Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core i9-14900HX Comparison
Intel Core 3 201E
Core i9-14900HX
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core i9-14900HX
The Verdict
The data presents a decisive matchup. The Intel Core i9-14900HX wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison, taking 17 of 17 tests. The Core 3 201E does not post a single winning score. The i9-14900HX holds the 91st percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the Core 3 201E sits at the 73rd percentile. The average benchmark score difference is substantial: 56004 for the i9-14900HX versus 19056 for the Core 3 201E.
The Core 3 201E is a desktop part aimed at basic computing. Its 4 cores and 8 threads, paired with a 60 W TDP, position it for entry-level systems. The i9-14900HX is a mobile processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, designed for high-performance laptops. The i9-14900HX is the clear choice for anyone running multi-threaded workloads, content creation, or demanding applications. The Core 3 201E serves lighter tasks where the smaller footprint and lower core count suffice. The data does not support any scenario where the Core 3 201E outperforms the i9-14900HX, so the selection depends entirely on platform: desktop builders with modest needs choose the Core 3 201E, while mobile users requiring maximum compute choose the i9-14900HX.
Architecture Differences
Both processors come from Intel, and both use a 10 nm process node. The Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the i9-14900HX uses Raptor Lake-HX. The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads. The i9-14900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads, a sixfold increase in core count and a fourfold increase in thread count. The L3 cache tells a similar story: the Core 3 201E has 12 MB shared, while the i9-14900HX has 36 MB shared. L2 cache per core is 1.25 MB on the Core 3 201E versus 2 MB on the i9-14900HX. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core.
The die size differs markedly. The Core 3 201E measures 163 mm², while the i9-14900HX measures 257 mm². The i9-14900HX is a larger, more complex die to accommodate the additional cores and cache. The Core 3 201E has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The i9-14900HX has a lower base clock of 2.20 GHz but a much higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz. This boost advantage, combined with the core count, explains the i9-14900HX's dominance.
The TDP values are close: 60 W for the Core 3 201E and 55 W for the i9-14900HX. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The i9-14900HX has an unlocked multiplier, making it overclockable, while the Core 3 201E does not. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 3 201E uses UHD Graphics 730, and the i9-14900HX uses UHD Graphics 770. Both support ECC memory and both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The sockets are incompatible: the Core 3 201E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i9-14900HX uses Intel BGA 1964. The market segments reflect this: Desktop for the Core 3 201E, Mobile for the i9-14900HX.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The i9-14900HX wins every recorded comparison, but the margins vary significantly by workload. The smallest advantage appears in single-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i9-14900HX scores 2181.5 against 1780, a delta of -18.4%. PassMark single-thread shows a similar gap: 4175 versus 3482, a delta of -16.6%. These are the closest results in the entire dataset, indicating that the Core 3 201E is not far behind when only one core is active.
The gap widens dramatically in multi-threaded tests. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows the i9-14900HX at 30055 versus 12613, a delta of -58%. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 15616 versus 5297, a delta of -66.1%. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows 4574 versus 1271, a delta of -72.2%. The pattern is consistent: the more cores utilized, the larger the i9-14900HX's lead.
PassMark tests reinforce this trend. Data compression shows the i9-14900HX at 539965 versus 164160, a delta of -69.6%. Data encryption shows 32619 versus 8931, a delta of -72.6%. Integer math shows 157375 versus 43894, a delta of -72.1%. Floating point math shows 112273 versus 33260, a delta of -70.4%. The i9-14900HX leads by roughly 70% or more in most multi-threaded PassMark workloads.
Some tests show slightly smaller margins. PassMark physics shows 2638 versus 1141, a delta of -56.7%. Extended instructions show 31247 versus 11035, a delta of -64.7%. Random string sorting shows 60861 versus 17783, a delta of -70.8%. Find prime numbers shows 193 versus 57, a delta of -70.5%. PassMark multithread shows 43778 versus 14839, a delta of -66.1%. The i9-14900HX maintains a commanding lead across every category, with the smallest deficit for the Core 3 201E appearing only in single-threaded workloads.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every major specification. The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads; the i9-14900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clock: 3.60 GHz versus 2.20 GHz. Boost clock: 4.80 GHz versus 5.80 GHz. TDP: 60 W versus 55 W. Socket: Intel Socket 1700 versus Intel BGA 1964. Codename: Bartlett Lake versus Raptor Lake-HX. Generation: Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) versus Core i9 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh). Die size: 163 mm² versus 257 mm². L2 cache per core: 1.25 MB versus 2 MB. L3 cache shared: 12 MB versus 36 MB. Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s for the Core 3 201E, with no recorded value for the i9-14900HX. Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 730 versus UHD Graphics 770. Market segment: Desktop versus Mobile. Release date: 2025-01-12 versus 2024-01-07. The launch MSRP for the Core 3 201E is $134; the i9-14900HX has no recorded launch MSRP. Multiplier unlocked: false for the Core 3 201E, true for the i9-14900HX. Part numbers: SRVTR versus SRMXF.
Identical specifications include the manufacturer (Intel), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), L1 cache (80 KB per core), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC memory support (true), PCIe (Gen 5, 16 lanes CPU only), and production status (Active). The i9-14900HX has no recorded memory bandwidth figure, so no comparison is possible for that field.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.
Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-threaded workloads?
A: The i9-14900HX leads by -58% in Cinebench R23 multi-core, -66.1% in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and -72.2% in Cinebench R15 multi-core. PassMark multithread shows a -66.1% delta.
Q: Is the Core 3 201E competitive in single-threaded performance?
A: The Core 3 201E is closer in single-threaded tests but still loses. PassMark single-thread shows the i9-14900HX at 4175 versus 3482, a -16.6% delta. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 2181.5 versus 1780, a -18.4% delta.
Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?
A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. Both also support ECC memory.
Q: Are these processors compatible with the same motherboard?
A: No. The Core 3 201E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i9-14900HX uses Intel BGA 1964. The Core 3 201E is a desktop part, and the i9-14900HX is a mobile part.
Q: What are the integrated graphics on each processor?
A: The Core 3 201E uses UHD Graphics 730. The i9-14900HX uses UHD Graphics 770.
Where Each One Wins
The i9-14900HX wins every benchmark in the comparison, so its territory is unambiguous. It dominates multi-threaded workloads: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 30055, Cinebench R20 multi-core at 15616, and Cinebench R15 multi-core at 4574. It also leads in memory-heavy tasks like data compression (539965 versus 164160) and random string sorting (60861 versus 17783). For users running rendering, encoding, compilation, or other parallel workloads, the i9-14900HX delivers roughly two to three times the throughput of the Core 3 201E, depending on the test.
The Core 3 201E has no benchmark wins, but the data does show where the gap narrows. Single-threaded tests are its relative stronghold. The -16.6% delta in PassMark single-thread and the -18.4% delta in Cinebench R23 single-core are the smallest margins in the dataset. In this range, the Core 3 201E is within reach of the i9-14900HX for lightly threaded applications. The Core 3 201E also consumes a similar TDP (60 W versus 55 W) while offering far fewer cores, which suggests it can serve in basic desktop builds where the i9-14900HX's mobile platform is not an option. The Core 3 201E has a launch MSRP of $134, while the i9-14900HX has no recorded launch MSRP, so entry-level desktop buyers have a clear, low-cost path into Intel's 10 nm lineup. The i9-14900HX, with its unlocked multiplier and higher boost clock, is the pick for performance-focused mobile systems.