Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison
Intel Core 3 201E
Core i7-14650HX
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core i7-14650HX
The Verdict
The benchmark database shows a decisive performance hierarchy between these two Intel processors. The Intel Core i7-14650HX wins every single head-to-head comparison, taking 17 out of 17 recorded tests. The Intel Core 3 201E records zero wins. This is not a close contest by any metric.
The Core i7-14650HX sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Core 3 201E lands in the 73rd percentile. The average benchmark score for the i7-14650HX is 41,576, more than double the Core 3 201E's 19,056. The nearest rivals for the Core 3 201E include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19,047 and the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19,039, both within a fraction of a percent. The i7-14650HX competes with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H at 41,621 and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41,376, showing it trades blows with high-end desktop parts.
For desktop users needing a modest, power-conscious processor with ECC support and a low launch MSRP of $134, the Core 3 201E offers a baseline. For anyone needing serious multi-threaded throughput, the i7-14650HX is the only choice from this data.
Architecture Differences
The two processors share the same Intel 10 nm process node and both are produced by Intel's foundry, but their underlying designs diverge significantly. The Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. It is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700. The Core i7-14650HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series, and mounts on Intel BGA 1964 for mobile systems.
Core counts tell the main story. The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, a 4x increase in cores and 3x in threads. This explains the massive multicore gaps throughout the benchmark results.
Cache hierarchies also differ. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 per core. The Core 3 201E has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3. The i7-14650HX has 2 MB of L2 per core and 30 MB of shared L3, meaning the larger chip carries more than double the total L3 capacity.
Clock speeds show an interesting inversion. The Core 3 201E has a base clock of 3.60 GHz, considerably higher than the i7-14650HX's 2.20 GHz. But the boost clock favors the mobile part: 5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. The i7-14650HX also has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 3 201E is locked.
Thermal design points are close, with the Core 3 201E rated at 60 W and the i7-14650HX at 55 W, despite the latter having four times the cores. The i7-14650HX has a larger die at 257 mm² versus 163 mm² for the Core 3 201E.
Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The Core 3 201E lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s; the i7-14650HX has no recorded bandwidth figure. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: the Core 3 201E uses UHD Graphics 730, the i7-14650HX uses UHD Graphics 710. The Core 3 201E released on 2025-01-12, while the i7-14650HX released about a year earlier on 2024-01-07.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The largest margins appear in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i7-14650HX scores 3,470.5 against 1,271 for the Core 3 201E, a 63.4% advantage. Cinebench R20 multicore shows 11,946 versus 5,297, a 55.7% gap. Cinebench R23 multicore narrows the relative difference to 38.3%, with scores of 20,454 and 12,613.
PassMark integer math shows the i7-14650HX at 116,661 versus 43,894, a 62.4% lead. Floating point math follows the same pattern: 84,999 versus 33,260, a 60.9% margin. Prime number finding, a test sensitive to core count, gives the i7-14650HX a 62.5% edge with 152 points against 57.
Data compression and encryption also heavily favor the larger chip. The i7-14650HX scores 398,418 in data compression, 58.8% ahead of the Core 3 201E's 164,160. Encryption shows a 61% gap, with 22,917 versus 8,931. Random string sorting delivers a 58.7% advantage, 43,035 against 17,783.
Single-thread results are much closer but still favor the i7-14650HX. Cinebench R23 singlecore shows 1,969 versus 1,780, only a 9.6% gap. PassMark single-thread shows 3,841 versus 3,482, a 9.3% difference. Cinebench R15 singlecore has a larger 37.3% gap, 285.5 versus 179, and Cinebench R20 singlecore shows 1,686 against 747, a 55.7% gap.
The physics test, which often reflects both single-thread and multi-thread performance, gives the i7-14650HX a 48.2% lead, 2,202 against 1,141. Extended instructions show a 54.3% gap, 24,150 versus 11,035. The multithread PassMark test shows a 55.7% difference, 33,495 versus 14,839.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.
Q: What are the boost clock speeds?
A: The Core i7-14650HX boosts to 5.20 GHz. The Core 3 201E boosts to 4.80 GHz. The Core 3 201E has a higher base clock at 3.60 GHz versus 2.20 GHz for the i7-14650HX.
Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?
A: The Core i7-14650HX has an average benchmark score of 41,576, placing it in the 88th percentile. The Core 3 201E averages 19,056, placing it in the 73rd percentile.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: Both the Core 3 201E and the Core i7-14650HX support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configurations.
Q: What is the closest rival to the Core 3 201E in the database?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has an average score of 19,047, essentially tied with the Core 3 201E's 19,056. The Intel Core i5-12400F is also close at 19,039.
Q: Is the Core i7-14650HX unlocked for overclocking?
A: Yes, the Core i7-14650HX has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 3 201E is not unlocked.
Where Each One Wins
The Core i7-14650HX wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its largest advantages come in heavily parallel workloads: Cinebench R15 multicore (63.4% ahead), data encryption (61% ahead), and floating point math (60.9% ahead). These results follow directly from the 16-core, 24-thread configuration against the 4-core, 8-thread Core 3 201E.
The Core i7-14650HX also leads in single-thread tests, though by smaller margins. PassMark single-thread shows only a 9.3% gap, and Cinebench R23 singlecore shows 9.6%. This indicates the higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz and the larger 30 MB L3 cache provide meaningful single-thread advantages, even though the Core 3 201E starts from a higher 3.60 GHz base.
The Core 3 201E does have some distinguishing traits from the data. It carries a launch MSRP of $134, making it an accessible desktop entry point. Its 60 W TDP is close to the i7-14650HX's 55 W, but it achieves this with far fewer cores. Its single-thread performance, measured by PassMark at 3,482, is within 9.3% of the i7-14650HX, showing the Bartlett Lake design delivers competitive per-core efficiency. Its 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is explicitly recorded, while the i7-14650HX lacks a listed figure.
For users constrained to desktop Socket 1700 platforms, the Core 3 201E is the only one of these two that mounts there. The i7-14650HX requires Intel BGA 1964, a mobile socket. The Core 3 201E also includes UHD Graphics 730, a step above the i7-14650HX's UHD Graphics 710, though both are integrated solutions.
The data supports a clear split: the Core 3 201E serves as a modest desktop processor with ECC support and a low launch MSRP, while the Core i7-14650HX delivers more than double the average benchmark score and holds its own against high-end desktop rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, which it edges by 0.5%. Users needing maximum throughput in rendering, compression, encryption, or math-heavy tasks should select the i7-14650HX. Users building a compact desktop with lighter loads and ECC requirements would find the Core 3 201E adequate, though the recorded benchmarks show no workload where it outperforms its larger sibling.