Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the benchmark score difference between the Intel Core 3 201E and the Intel Core i5-14500T?

A: The Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19,056, while the Core i5-14500T scores 28,065. The Core i5-14500T ranks in the 80th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 73rd percentile for the Core 3 201E.

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multicore testing?

A: The Core 3 201E wins with a score of 12,613 versus 11,790 for the Core i5-14500T, a 7% advantage. This is the only head-to-head benchmark where the Core 3 201E comes out ahead.

Q: How do the two processors compare in PassMark integer math performance?

A: The Core i5-14500T scores 80,922, which is 45.8% higher than the Core 3 201E's 43,894. This represents the largest single benchmark margin between the two chips.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, giving it a substantial advantage in heavily threaded workloads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 3 201E and the Core i5-14500T support ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two chips include?

A: The Core 3 201E uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core i5-14500T uses UHD Graphics 770.

The Verdict

The benchmark data shows a clear separation between these two Intel Socket 1700 desktop processors. The Core i5-14500T wins 16 of the 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, with margins ranging from 3.2% in Cinebench R23 single-core to 45.8% in PassMark integer math. Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide a decisive advantage in multi-threaded tasks, reflected in the 35.2% higher Cinebench R20 multicore score and the 35.2% higher PassMark multithread score.

The Core 3 201E does hold one notable win: a 7% advantage in Cinebench R23 multicore, where it scores 12,613 versus 11,790. This result suggests that in certain specific rendering workloads, the 4-core chip with its 4.80 GHz boost clock can outperform the lower-clocked 14-core part. The Core 3 201E also carries a lower launch MSRP of $134, while the Core i5-14500T launched at $232.

For users prioritizing raw multi-core throughput, data compression, encryption, or floating-point math, the Core i5-14500T is the stronger pick by wide margins. For those whose primary workload matches Cinebench R23 multicore rendering, the Core 3 201E delivers a measurable win at a lower launch MSRP. The Core i5-14500T also has a higher overall CPU percentile ranking (80th versus 73rd), indicating better standing across the full database of tested processors.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core i5-14500T dominates most recorded tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 2,022 versus 1,271 for the Core 3 201E, a 37.1% margin. Cinebench R20 multicore shows a 35.2% gap (8,177 versus 5,297), and Cinebench R20 single-core favors the Core i5-14500T by 35.3% (1,154 versus 747).

PassMark tests amplify the Core i5-14500T's advantage. Integer math shows the largest gap at 45.8% (80,922 versus 43,894), followed by floating-point math at 43.5% (58,869 versus 33,260) and data encryption at 42% (15,410 versus 8,931). Data compression trails by 37.4% (262,417 versus 164,160), and random string sorting by 37.5% (28,462 versus 17,783). Extended instructions show a 31.2% gap (16,043 versus 11,035), while find prime numbers is 29.6% higher (81 versus 57).

The Core 3 201E's sole victory comes in Cinebench R23 multicore, where it scores 12,613 against 11,790, a 7% delta. This is unusual given the Core i5-14500T's strong showing in the R15 and R20 multicore tests, indicating workload-specific behavior in the R23 version. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core i5-14500T still wins, but by a modest 3.2% (1,838 versus 1,780).

Other close results include PassMark physics, where the Core i5-14500T leads by 11.4% (1,288 versus 1,141), and PassMark single-thread, where the gap narrows to 6.8% (3,736 versus 3,482). The Core i5-14500T also wins both PassMark multithread (22,910 versus 14,839, a 35.2% gap) and PassMark single-thread tests.

Specification Differences

The two processors share several foundational specifications: both use Intel Socket 1700, support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, run dual-channel memory, support ECC memory, use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and have locked multipliers. The die sizes differ, with the Core 3 201E at 163 mm² and the Core i5-14500T at 215 mm².

The core configuration differs significantly. The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 3.60 GHz for the Core 3 201E and 1.70 GHz for the Core i5-14500T, though both reach the same 4.80 GHz boost clock. Thermal design power also differs: 60 watts for the Core 3 201E versus 35 watts for the Core i5-14500T.

Cache sizes diverge substantially. Both use 80 KB L1 per core and 1.25 MB L2 per core, but the Core i5-14500T has 24 MB of shared L3 cache versus 12 MB on the Core 3 201E. Memory bandwidth is listed at 76.8 GB/s for the Core 3 201E, while no figure is recorded for the Core i5-14500T.

The integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 3 201E versus UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i5-14500T. Release dates also differ, with the Core 3 201E releasing on 2025-01-12 and the Core i5-14500T on 2024-01-07.

Architecture Differences

The Core 3 201E is built on the Bartlett Lake architecture and belongs to the Core 3 generation, while the Core i5-14500T uses Raptor Lake architecture from the Core 14th Gen series, specifically Raptor Lake-R. Both are manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry.

The Core i5-14500T's architecture provides a higher core count with the same per-core L1 and L2 cache sizes, but doubles the shared L3 cache from 12 MB to 24 MB. This larger L3 cache likely contributes to its strong performance in data compression and encryption workloads, where the Core i5-14500T leads by 37.4% and 42%, respectively.

The Bartlett Lake architecture of the Core 3 201E delivers a higher base clock (3.60 GHz versus 1.70 GHz) while maintaining the same 4.80 GHz boost. The lower TDP of the Core i5-14500T (35 watts versus 60 watts) indicates a power-efficiency design, despite the higher core count. Both use the same PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes, and both support ECC memory, making them suitable for entry-level server or workstation builds.

Where Each One Wins

The Core i5-14500T wins in 16 of 17 recorded benchmarks, making it the dominant choice for most workloads. Its largest margins come in integer math (45.8% ahead), floating-point math (43.5% ahead), and data encryption (42% ahead). Data compression trails by 37.4%, random string sorting by 37.5%, and multithread performance by 35.2%. These results indicate a strong fit for content creation, scientific computing, database work, and any application that scales across many cores.

The Core i5-14500T also leads in single-threaded tests, though by smaller margins: 6.8% in PassMark single-thread and 3.2% in Cinebench R23 single-core. Its Cinebench R15 single-core lead is 29%, and Cinebench R20 single-core is 35.3%. This suggests the Core i5-14500T handles both multi-core and single-core tasks well, with the exception of Cinebench R23 multicore.

The Core 3 201E wins only Cinebench R23 multicore, with a 7% advantage (12,613 versus 11,790). This specific result indicates that in certain rendering workloads, the higher base clock of the Core 3 201E can overcome the core-count deficit. Users running Cinebench R23 as their primary benchmark or workload may prefer the Core 3 201E for this specific task.

The Core 3 201E also records a lower launch MSRP of $134, which may appeal to buyers focused on that single benchmark result or those needing a lower-cost Socket 1700 option. However, the aggregate data shows the Core i5-14500T as the stronger processor across nearly every measured category, with a higher average benchmark score (28,065 versus 19,056) and a higher CPU percentile ranking (80th versus 73rd).