Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core i3-14100 Comparison
Intel Core 3 201E
Core i3-14100
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core i3-14100
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head benchmark data shows a decisive overall advantage for the Intel Core i3-14100, which wins 13 of the 17 recorded comparisons, while the Intel Core 3 201E takes 4 wins. The margins, however, tell a more nuanced story than the raw win count.
The most striking result in the entire dataset is the PassMark physics test, where the Core 3 201E posts a score of 1141 against 958 for the Core i3-14100, a delta of 19.1 percent in favor of the Bartlett Lake part. This is the largest percentage gap in either direction across all recorded benchmarks. The Core 3 201E also wins in PassMark random string sorting (17783 vs 17397, a 2.2 percent edge), PassMark data encryption (8931 vs 8838, a 1.1 percent advantage), and PassMark find prime numbers (57 vs 55, a 3.6 percent lead).
Outside of those four tests, the Core i3-14100 consistently leads, though often by small margins. In the Cinebench suite, the i3-14100 wins all six tests by a uniform 1.6 percent. That includes Cinebench R23 multicore (12820 vs 12613) and Cinebench R23 singlecore (1809 vs 1780), as well as the R15 and R20 variants in both single-thread and multi-thread modes.
The larger deltas for the i3-14100 appear in PassMark workloads. The single-thread test shows the biggest gap: 3759 for the i3-14100 versus 3482 for the Core 3 201E, a 7.4 percent difference. PassMark extended instructions follows at 7 percent (11865 vs 11035). Data compression and floating point math both show a 5.7 percent edge for the i3-14100, with scores of 174115 vs 164160 and 35266 vs 33260 respectively. Integer math favors the i3-14100 by 3.2 percent (45329 vs 43894), and multithread shows a 1.7 percent lead (15095 vs 14839).
The average benchmark score puts the Core 3 201E at 19056, which places it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Core i3-14100 averages 18318, sitting in the 72nd percentile. Despite the i3-14100 winning more head-to-head tests, the Core 3 201E has a higher average score overall. The nearest rivals for the Core 3 201E include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (average score 19047, delta 0 percent), the Intel Core i5-12400F (average score 19039, delta 0.1 percent), and the Intel Core i5-1335U (average score 18982, delta 0.4 percent). For the Core i3-14100, the closest competitors are the Intel Core 3 305 (average score 18302, delta 0.1 percent), the Intel Core 5 330 (average score 18345, delta -0.1 percent), and the Intel Core 7 360 (average score 18374, delta -0.3 percent).
FAQ
Q: Which CPU wins more benchmarks in the head-to-head comparison?
A: The Intel Core i3-14100 wins 13 of the 17 recorded tests, while the Intel Core 3 201E wins 4.
Q: What is the largest single benchmark margin between the two processors?
A: The PassMark physics test shows the biggest gap: the Core 3 201E scores 1141 versus 958 for the Core i3-14100, a 19.1 percent advantage for the Bartlett Lake chip.
Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?
A: The Core i3-14100 scores 12820 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is 1.6 percent ahead of the Core 3 201E's 12613.
Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score and percentile ranking?
A: The Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19056 and sits in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. The Core i3-14100 averages 18318 and ranks in the 72nd percentile.
Q: Are there any workloads where the Core 3 201E outperforms the Core i3-14100 beyond the physics test?
A: Yes. The Core 3 201E leads in PassMark random string sorting (17783 vs 17397, 2.2 percent), PassMark data encryption (8931 vs 8838, 1.1 percent), and PassMark find prime numbers (57 vs 55, 3.6 percent).
Q: How close are the two processors in single-thread PassMark performance?
A: The Core i3-14100 scores 3759 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 7.4 percent higher than the Core 3 201E's 3482. This is the largest single-thread gap recorded between the two.
The Verdict
The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core i3-14100 is the stronger choice for users prioritizing single-threaded performance and general productivity workloads. It wins every Cinebench test, all by a consistent 1.6 percent, and takes the PassMark single-thread test by 7.4 percent. The i3-14100 also leads in data compression (174115 vs 164160), floating point math (35266 vs 33260), integer math (45329 vs 43894), extended instructions (11865 vs 11035), and multithread (15095 vs 14839). For users running these types of workloads, the i3-14100 delivers measurable advantages across the board.
The Intel Core 3 201E, however, has its own distinct strengths. The 19.1 percent lead in PassMark physics is substantial, and the wins in data encryption, random string sorting, and prime number finding suggest that certain specialized workloads favor the Bartlett Lake architecture. The Core 3 201E also carries a higher average benchmark score (19056 vs 18318) and a higher percentile ranking (73rd vs 72nd), despite losing the majority of direct comparisons.
The two processors share identical core counts, thread counts, cache configurations, and TDP ratings, so the differences come down to clock speeds and architecture. The Core 3 201E has a higher base clock (3.60 GHz vs 3.50 GHz) and a higher boost clock (4.80 GHz vs 4.70 GHz), yet the i3-14100 still wins most tests. This suggests the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture extracts more performance per clock in typical workloads, while Bartlett Lake's advantage appears concentrated in specific instruction patterns.
Users who rely on physics simulations or encryption-heavy tasks will find the Core 3 201E's margins compelling. Users who run general-purpose applications, content creation tools, or mixed productivity workloads will likely see better results from the Core i3-14100, given its dominance in Cinebench and the majority of PassMark tests.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ on several specification fields, though many fundamentals are identical. Both use the Intel Socket 1700, both are desktop parts, and both are currently active in production.
Clock speeds represent the most direct difference. The Intel Core 3 201E has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel Core i3-14100 has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Core 3 201E holds a 0.10 GHz advantage at both base and boost.
The release dates differ by roughly one year. The Core i3-14100 launched on 2024-01-07, while the Core 3 201E launched on 2025-01-12.
The part numbers and codenames also distinguish the two. The Core 3 201E carries part number SRVTR and uses the Bartlett Lake codename. The Core i3-14100 carries part number SRMX1 and uses the Raptor Lake-R codename.
Memory bandwidth is listed for the Core 3 201E at 76.8 GB/s, while no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for the Core i3-14100. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory.
Both processors use the same 10 nm process node, fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier.
Architecture Differences
The architectural data shows a 10 nm process node for both processors, fabricated by Intel with a die size of 163 mm². The Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The Core i3-14100 uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core i3 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The i3-14100 is explicitly listed with the Raptor Lake architecture, while the Core 3 201E has no architecture field recorded.
Core and thread counts are identical: 4 cores and 8 threads for both. The cache hierarchy matches exactly as well. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither processor includes 3D V-Cache.
The integrated graphics are identical: both use UHD Graphics 730. Both support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both processors are built for the desktop market segment, and both are actively in production.
The TDP is the same for both at 60 watts. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The memory bandwidth figure of 76.8 GB/s is recorded only for the Core 3 201E.
The key architectural difference lies in the generation and codename. The Core i3-14100 represents the Raptor Lake Refresh lineup, while the Core 3 201E represents the newer Bartlett Lake family. Despite the generational gap, the recorded specifications show nearly identical configurations, with the Bartlett Lake part offering slightly higher clock speeds. The benchmark results indicate that the older Raptor Lake Refresh design still holds a performance advantage in most measured workloads, particularly in single-threaded tasks and Cinebench rendering tests.