Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the Intel Core 3 201E and the Intel Core 7 150U reveals a split decision, with each processor claiming victories in different workload categories. Out of 17 recorded head-to-head tests, the Core 7 150U wins 10 while the Core 3 201E takes 7, but the magnitude of those wins tells a more nuanced story.

The most decisive result belongs to the Core 3 201E in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 12613 against the Core 7 150U's 8883, a 42% advantage. This is the single largest delta in the entire comparison and establishes the desktop part as the clear multi-threaded rendering leader. The Cinebench R20 multi-core test also favors the Core 3 201E, though by a much narrower margin: 5297 versus 5248, a 0.9% edge. The PassMark multithread test similarly shows the Core 3 201E ahead at 14839 versus 14700, again by 0.9%.

The Core 7 150U counterattacks in single-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R15 single-core, it scores 254 versus 179, a 29.5% lead. Cinebench R23 single-core shows the Core 7 150U ahead at 1875.5 versus 1780, a 5.1% advantage. PassMark single-thread results are nearly identical, with the Core 7 150U edging out 3508 to 3482, a 0.7% difference. Cinebench R15 multi-core also favors the Core 7 150U at 1505.5 versus 1271, a 15.6% margin.

The remaining tests are split between the two. The Core 3 201E wins PassMark extended instructions decisively, 11035 versus 8748, a 26.1% gap, and PassMark physics by 12.7% (1141 versus 1012). It also takes data compression by 3.5% (164160 versus 158622). The Core 7 150U wins data encryption by 10.9% (10025 versus 8931), integer math by 14% (51057 versus 43894), floating point math by 3.3% (34405 versus 33260), random string sorting by 2.7% (18269 versus 17783), and find prime numbers by 1.7% (58 versus 57).

Looking at the overall average benchmark scores, the Core 3 201E posts 19056 against the Core 7 150U's 17395, a 9.5% aggregate advantage. The Core 3 201E sits at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Core 7 150U ranks at the 71st percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core 3 201E include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (average score 19047, 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-12400F (19039, 0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i5-1335U (18982, 0.4% delta). For the Core 7 150U, the nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (17482, -0.5% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G (17507, -0.6% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 (17333, 0.4% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 3 210 (17321, 0.4% delta).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families and target different market segments. The Core 3 201E is a desktop part built on the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core 7 150U is a mobile processor using the Raptor Lake-U architecture. Both use Intel's 10 nm process node and are manufactured by Intel.

The core configurations differ substantially. The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the Core 3 201E runs at higher base and boost clocks: 3.60 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost, compared to the Core 7 150U's 1.80 GHz base and 5.40 GHz boost. The Core 7 150U's higher boost clock explains its single-threaded wins, while the Core 3 201E's higher sustained clock rate contributes to its multi-threaded performance in longer workloads.

Thermal design power differs by a wide margin. The Core 3 201E carries a 60 W TDP, while the Core 7 150U is rated at 15 W. The Core 3 201E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the Core 7 150U is soldered to Intel BGA 1744. Cache configurations are identical in structure: both have 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3.

Memory support is another area of divergence. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, but the Core 3 201E supports ECC memory while the Core 7 150U does not. The Core 3 201E has a listed memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 150U has no bandwidth figure recorded in the database. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Core 3 201E provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Core 7 150U uses Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics separate the two further. The Core 3 201E includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 150U steps up to Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The die size for the Core 3 201E is recorded at 163 mm², while no die size is listed for the Core 7 150U. The release dates put the Core 7 150U earlier (January 2024) and the Core 3 201E later (January 2025). The Core 3 201E has a launch MSRP of $134 and a part number of SRVTR; the Core 7 150U has no launch MSRP recorded and part number SRMYP.

Where Each One Wins

The data points to distinct usage profiles for each processor. The Core 3 201E dominates in sustained multi-threaded rendering workloads. Its 42% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the standout result, indicating that longer rendering tasks, such as 3D scene production or video encoding, will complete significantly faster on the desktop part. The 26.1% advantage in PassMark extended instructions reinforces this, as those tests often involve SIMD-heavy code paths used in scientific and media applications. The 12.7% win in PassMark physics suggests better performance in simulation and physics calculations. Data compression also favors the Core 3 201E, with a 3.5% edge.

The Core 7 150U excels in interactive and bursty workloads. The 29.5% margin in Cinebench R15 single-core and the 5.1% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate snappier response in lightly threaded applications. The 14% advantage in integer math points to strengths in general-purpose arithmetic, while the 10.9% win in encryption shows better cryptographic throughput. The 3.3% lead in floating point math and the 2.7% edge in random string sorting round out its wins in memory-manipulation tasks. The 1.7% win in prime number finding is marginal but consistent with its single-thread advantage.

For mixed workloads, the differences shrink. PassMark multithread shows the Core 3 201E ahead by only 0.9%, and Cinebench R20 multi-core shows the same 0.9% margin. The PassMark single-thread scores are nearly tied at 3508 versus 3482, a 0.7% difference. These near-parity results suggest that for many real-world tasks, the choice between the two will come down to the specific application's threading and instruction usage rather than any overwhelming overall advantage.

The Core 3 201E's higher average benchmark score (19056 versus 17395) and better percentile ranking (73rd versus 71st) give it a slight aggregate edge. However, the Core 7 150U wins more individual tests, which reflects its suitability for latency-sensitive, single-threaded interactions.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E scores 12613 versus the Core 7 150U's 8883, a 42% advantage in multi-core rendering.

Q: How do the single-thread scores compare?

A: The Core 7 150U leads in Cinebench R15 single-core by 29.5% (254 versus 179) and in Cinebench R23 single-core by 5.1% (1875.5 versus 1780), while PassMark single-thread is nearly tied at 3508 versus 3482.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core 3 201E supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 150U does not.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Core 7 150U boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the Core 3 201E boosts to 4.80 GHz. The Core 3 201E has a higher base clock at 3.60 GHz versus 1.80 GHz.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: The Core 3 201E is rated at 60 W, while the Core 7 150U is rated at 15 W, reflecting the desktop versus mobile design targets.

Q: Which processor has better integrated graphics?

A: The Core 7 150U uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the Core 3 201E uses UHD Graphics 730.

Q: How many benchmark tests does each processor win?

A: The Core 7 150U wins 10 of the 17 head-to-head tests, while the Core 3 201E wins 7.

The Verdict

The recorded data draws a clear line between two different design philosophies. The Intel Core 3 201E is the choice for workloads that demand sustained multi-threaded throughput. Its 42% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 26.1% advantage in extended instructions, and 12.7% lead in physics make it the stronger option for rendering, simulation, and computation-heavy desktop tasks. The higher 60 W TDP and desktop socket allow it to maintain performance over longer durations, and ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive environments.

The Intel Core 7 150U is the better fit for mobile systems where power efficiency matters. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the desktop part's draw, and its 29.5% single-core lead in Cinebench R15, 14% advantage in integer math, and 10.9% edge in encryption suit it to interactive applications, office productivity, and security-related workloads. The 10-core, 12-thread configuration provides ample parallelism for everyday multitasking, and the Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units offers more capable integrated visuals.

For users who need a desktop processor with strong multi-threaded rendering and compute performance, the Core 3 201E delivers a decisive advantage in the workloads where it wins. For users who prioritize a low-power mobile chip with superior single-thread response and encryption throughput, the Core 7 150U is the data-supported pick. The overall average benchmark score favors the Core 3 201E by 9.5%, but the Core 7 150U's higher win count in individual tests shows that the right choice depends entirely on the workload mix.