Intel Core 3 201E vs Intel Core 5 130HL Comparison

The database contains two Intel Socket 1700 desktop processors with contrasting measurement coverage. The Intel Core 3 201E has a full benchmark profile, while the Intel Core 5 130HL has no benchmark scores recorded. This analysis separates quantified performance data for the Core 3 from the specification and architecture fields where both parts can be compared.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Head-to-head benchmark entries for the Core 3 201E versus the Core 5 130HL are absent. The database records 0 wins for each part, and the Core 5 130HL's benchmark array is empty. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest-rival entries. No direct measured win can therefore be assigned to either processor.

For the Core 3 201E, the recorded benchmark set provides the only quantified performance reference. In Cinebench R23, it scores 12613 multicore and 1780 singlecore. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 5297 multicore and 747 singlecore. In Cinebench R15, they are 1271 multicore and 179 singlecore. Passmark results include a multithread score of 14839, a single-thread score of 3482, data compression 164160, data encryption 8931, extended instructions 11035, find prime numbers 57, floating point math 33260, integer math 43894, physics 1141, and random string sorting 17783.

The Core 3's average benchmark score is 19056, which places it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. The Core 5 130HL is listed at the 50th percentile, but with no workload scores behind that figure. The absence of Core 5 measurements means the database cannot quantify a single workload in which the Core 5 beats the Core 3.

Where Each One Wins

Because the Core 5 130HL has no benchmark entries, the workload-based win split is one-sided in terms of available data. The Core 3 201E has recorded scores across Cinebench and Passmark workloads; the Core 5 has no recorded scores in any workload.

The Core 3's nearest rivals in the database show how its average score sits relative to other CPUs. AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has an average score of 19047 with a delta of 0%, Intel Core i5-12400F has 19039 with a delta of 0.1%, Intel Core i5-1335U has 18982 with a delta of 0.4%, and AMD EPYC 7773X has 18979 with a delta of 0.4%. The Core 3's average score of 19056 is therefore level with the Ryzen 5 7535HS and marginally ahead of the other three recorded rivals.

Within its own benchmark set, the Core 3 posts its largest absolute numbers in Passmark data compression (164160) and integer math (43894). Multi-threaded performance appears in Cinebench R23 multicore (12613) and Passmark multithread (14839). Single-thread performance appears in Passmark single-thread (3482) and Cinebench R23 singlecore (1780). These scores cover both multi-threaded and single-threaded Cinebench versions, as well as Passmark's integer, floating point, encryption, compression, and sorting workloads.

Since no Core 5 130HL benchmark scores are recorded, the database cannot allocate any workload-specific win to the Core 5, nor can it identify a use case where the Core 5's 12-core, 16-thread configuration outperforms the Core 3 in measured tests.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201E support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The Core 3 201E lists ECC memory support as true, while the Core 5 130HL lists ECC memory support as false.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core 5 130HL has 12 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Do the two processors use the same socket?

A: Yes. Both are recorded on Intel Socket 1700, both target the desktop market segment, and both have multiplierUnlocked set to false. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode.

Q: What integrated graphics are listed for each processor?

A: The Core 3 201E uses UHD Graphics 730. The Core 5 130HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.

Q: Is there any benchmark data for the Core 5 130HL?

A: No. The database records no benchmark entries for the Core 5 130HL, and its average benchmark score is 0. The Core 3 201E has a recorded average benchmark score of 19056.

Q: What are the process node and foundry for both chips?

A: Both are listed as Intel 10 nm parts manufactured by Intel.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core 3 201E | Intel Core 5 130HL |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 12 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.60 | 2.60 |

| TDP | 60 | 45 |

| Architecture | Not recorded | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) | Core 5 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Die size | 163 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | True | False |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |

| Release date | 2025-01-12T17:00:00.000Z | 2024-04-07T17:00:00.000Z |

| Launch MSRP | $134 | Not recorded |

| Part number | SRVTR | unknown |

| Benchmark profile | Recorded | Empty |

| Average benchmark score | 19056 | 0 |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 73 | 50 |

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's 10 nm process and manufactured by Intel, but their recorded architecture labels differ. The Core 3 201E is listed with the codename Bartlett Lake and a Core 3 generation label, while its architecture field is not recorded. The Core 5 130HL is listed with the Raptor Lake architecture, the codename Raptor Lake-PS, and a Core 5 generation label. The Core 3 201E's architecture field is not recorded, so direct microarchitecture comparison is limited to codename and generation labels.

The core configuration is the largest architectural split. The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads; the Core 5 130HL has 12 cores and 16 threads. The Core 5 also carries a larger L2 allocation per core (2 MB versus 1.25 MB) and a larger shared L3 (18 MB versus 12 MB). L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core.

Memory and I/O features differ as well. The Core 3 supports ECC memory, while the Core 5 does not. The Core 3 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s; the Core 5 has no memory bandwidth value in the database. The Core 3 exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, whereas the Core 5 exposes PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 3, Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on the Core 5. The Core 5's TDP is 45, while the Core 3's TDP is 60. Both parts reach the same 4.80 boost clock, but the Core 3's base clock is 3.60 versus 2.60 for the Core 5. Die size is recorded only for the Core 3, at 163 mm². The Core 5 130HL has no recorded die size, memory bandwidth, launch MSRP, or part number, while the Core 3 201E has recorded values for all of those fields. Both are active desktop parts on Intel Socket 1700 with locked multipliers and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support. Shared platform traits include DDR4 and DDR5 support, dual-channel memory bus, 10 nm Intel process, and 80 KB L1 per core.