Intel Core 3 100UL vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

The Intel Core 3 100UL and Intel Core 9 273PTE occupy different tiers within the same socket, and the recorded data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The Core 9 273PTE delivers substantially higher scores across all measured workloads, while the Core 3 100UL is positioned as a low-power, focused processor. The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two parts, so the analysis below relies on the Core 9 273PTE’s recorded benchmark suite and the architectural specifications of both chips.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core 9 273PTE has a full set of benchmark results, while the Core 3 100UL has no recorded scores in the database. This means all numerical comparisons come from the Core 9 273PTE’s performance profile. The Core 9 273PTE scores 2886 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 20445 in multi-core, and 3433 in Passmark single-thread. Its Passmark multithread score is 24054, and it reaches 82411 in integer math and 60673 in floating-point math. These are the reference points for judging the Core 3 100UL.

Without Core 3 100UL benchmark numbers, the comparison is indirect. The Core 9 273PTE sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 31143. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700F with a score of 31081 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS at 31074 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core i7-13700TE at 31028 (0.4% behind). The only rival ahead is the Intel Core i7-12650HX at 31290, which leads by 0.5%. These margins are tiny, showing the Core 9 273PTE is tightly grouped with strong desktop and mobile chips.

The Core 3 100UL, by contrast, has no benchmark entries and a percentile of 50, placing it at the midpoint of the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, meaning no measured performance data exists. The Core 9 273PTE’s scores, such as 258704 in Passmark data compression and 14253 in data encryption, are specific strengths. The Core 3 100UL cannot be directly compared on these numbers, but its lower core and thread counts, combined with a lower boost clock, indicate it would trail in multi-threaded workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a 10 nm process node and Intel as the foundry, but their architectures diverge. The Core 3 100UL uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, while the Core 9 273PTE is based on Bartlett Lake. The Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads, whereas the Core 9 273PTE doubles the core count to 12 and triples the thread count to 24. This is the most significant architectural gap.

Clock speeds differ considerably. The Core 3 100UL has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Core 9 273PTE starts higher at 1.40 GHz base and boosts to 5.50 GHz. The Core 9 273PTE’s 1 GHz higher boost clock contributes to its single-thread performance advantage. Thermal design power also separates them: the Core 3 100UL is rated at 15 W, while the Core 9 273PTE is rated at 45 W. This threefold difference in power envelope reflects their intended usage.

Cache hierarchies differ in size and organization. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core on the Core 3 100UL and 2 MB per core on the Core 9 273PTE. The L3 cache is 10 MB shared on the Core 3 100UL versus 36 MB shared on the Core 9 273PTE. The Core 9 273PTE’s larger caches, particularly the 36 MB L3, support its higher core count and more demanding workloads.

Memory support is identical in type, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. However, the Core 9 273PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core 3 100UL has no bandwidth figure in the database. PCIe connectivity differs: the Core 3 100UL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 9 273PTE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The newer PCIe standard and doubled lane count give the Core 9 273PTE more expansion headroom.

Integrated graphics also differ. The Core 3 100UL uses UHD Graphics 64EU, while the Core 9 273PTE uses UHD Graphics 730. Neither part has a benchmark score for its iGPU, so graphical capability is qualitative. The Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Core 3 100UL. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither allows overclocking.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PTE wins on raw compute. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 5.50 GHz boost clock, make it the clear choice for multi-threaded work. The recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20445 and Passmark multithread score of 24054 indicate heavy parallel workloads, such as video rendering, compilation, or scientific simulation, are its domain. Its single-core performance is also strong, with 2886 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3433 in Passmark single-thread, so it does not sacrifice responsiveness for throughput.

The Core 9 273PTE also wins in memory-intensive tasks. Its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and 36 MB L3 cache provide ample data staging for large datasets. The Passmark data compression score of 258704 and random string sorting score of 28973 show it handles data manipulation efficiently. ECC memory support is another advantage for workstation stability, a feature the Core 3 100UL lacks entirely.

The Core 3 100UL wins on power efficiency. Its 15 W TDP is one-third of the Core 9 273PTE’s 45 W rating. This makes it suitable for compact, fanless, or thermally constrained systems where low heat output matters more than peak performance. Its 6 cores and 8 threads still handle light multitasking and everyday productivity, and its 4.50 GHz boost clock offers decent single-thread response for interactive applications. The socket compatibility with Intel Socket 1700 means it can drop into the same motherboards as the Core 9 273PTE, but the performance gap is vast.

For single-threaded tasks, the Core 9 273PTE’s higher boost clock gives it an edge, but the Core 3 100UL’s 4.50 GHz is not weak. The data shows no direct comparison, but the Core 3 100UL’s lower core count and cache size suggest it would win only in power-constrained scenarios, not in absolute speed.

The Verdict

The data points to a decisive winner: the Intel Core 9 273PTE. It holds the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 31143, and sits within 0.5% of established rivals like the Intel Core i7-12700F and AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, 5.50 GHz boost clock, and 36 MB L3 cache deliver a level of performance that the Core 3 100UL cannot match, given the latter’s 6 cores, 8 threads, and 10 MB L3.

The Core 3 100UL, with no benchmark scores and a 50th percentile rating, is a mid-tier part. Its 15 W TDP is its defining feature, making it appropriate for low-power systems where the Core 9 273PTE’s 45 W rating would be excessive. The Core 9 273PTE is for users who need multi-core muscle and are willing to run a higher-wattage processor. The Core 3 100UL is for those who prioritize quiet operation and minimal heat in a basic desktop.

The launch MSRP of the Core 9 273PTE is $549. The Core 3 100UL has no launch MSRP recorded. The Core 9 273PTE also supports ECC memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, both absent or reduced on the Core 3 100UL. For any workload that benefits from multiple cores, the Core 9 273PTE is the only rational choice from these two. The Core 3 100UL only makes sense in a system where power draw is the primary constraint.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The Core 9 273PTE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the Core 3 100UL boosts to 4.50 GHz. The Core 9 273PTE also has a higher base clock at 1.40 GHz versus 1.20 GHz.

Q: Does the Core 3 100UL support ECC memory?

A: No. ECC memory support is present only on the Core 9 273PTE. The Core 3 100UL does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The Core 9 273PTE is at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 3 100UL is at the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the L3 cache size on each chip?

A: The Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 3 100UL has 10 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Are both processors compatible with the same motherboard socket?

A: Yes, both use Intel Socket 1700. They differ in PCIe support: the Core 9 273PTE has Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Core 3 100UL has Gen 4 with 8 lanes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 3 100UL | Intel Core 9 273PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 8 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 1.20 GHz | 1.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 45 W |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 10 nm |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 10 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 64EU | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $549 |

| Part Number | unknown | SA4QJ |

| Release Date | 2024-04-07 | 2026-03-08 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 82 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 31143 |