Intel Core 3 100U vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison
Intel Core 3 100U
Core i9-14901TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 3 100U vs Intel Core i9-14901TE
Intel Core 3 100U and Intel Core i9-14901TE are both Intel processors built on the Raptor Lake architecture, but they target different market segments and have distinct specifications. The Core 3 100U is a mobile processor with a 15 W TDP, while the Core i9-14901TE is a desktop processor with a 45 W TDP. The data shows these two CPUs occupy very different positions in the performance spectrum, with the Core 3 100U having a percentile ranking of 70 against all CPUs, while the Core i9-14901TE has a percentile ranking of 50. However, the Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct comparison. This analysis relies on the available specification data and the benchmark results for the Core 3 100U.
FAQ
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The Intel Core 3 100U has 6 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?
A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 100U has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.
Q: What is the difference in cache sizes between the two?
A: The Intel Core 3 100U has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 10 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: No. The Intel Core 3 100U does not support ECC memory, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE does support ECC memory.
Q: What are the PCIe capabilities of each processor?
A: The Intel Core 3 100U supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Intel Core i9-14901TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?
A: Both have integrated graphics. The Intel Core 3 100U uses UHD Graphics 64EU, and the Intel Core i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770.
Architecture Differences
Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture, but they are derived from different variants. The Core 3 100U uses the Raptor Lake-U codename, while the Core i9-14901TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, which is part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Both are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry.
The core configurations differ substantially. The Core 3 100U has 6 cores and 8 threads, indicating a hybrid arrangement with fewer total threads than cores doubled. The Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, showing full multi-threading support. The L1 cache is identical per core at 80 KB, but the L2 cache per core is larger on the Core i9-14901TE at 2 MB versus 1.25 MB on the Core 3 100U. The L3 cache is significantly larger on the Core i9-14901TE at 36 MB shared, compared to 10 MB shared on the Core 3 100U.
The memory support is the same for both: DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory bus. However, ECC memory support is present only on the Core i9-14901TE. The PCIe interface also differs, with the Core i9-14901TE offering PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Core 3 100U offers PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes.
The die size is listed only for the Core i9-14901TE at 257 mm². The integrated graphics differ, with UHD Graphics 64EU on the Core 3 100U and UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i9-14901TE. The Core 3 100U is a mobile processor with a 15 W TDP, whereas the Core i9-14901TE is a desktop processor with a 45 W TDP. The socket types are different: Intel BGA 1744 for the mobile chip and Intel Socket 1700 for the desktop chip.
The release dates differ as well. The Core 3 100U was released on 2024-01-07, and the Core i9-14901TE was released on 2024-06-30. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 3 100U has a launch MSRP of $426, while the Core i9-14901TE has no recorded launch MSRP.
The Verdict
The data indicates that the Intel Core i9-14901TE is the superior processor for multi-threaded workloads, based on its higher core count, thread count, larger cache hierarchy, and higher clock speeds. The Core i9-14901TE offers 8 cores and 16 threads, a 2 MB per-core L2 cache, a 36 MB shared L3 cache, a base clock of 2.30 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. These specifications point to a processor designed for heavy desktop workloads, including content creation, rendering, and server-like applications, especially given its ECC memory support.
The Intel Core 3 100U, with 6 cores and 8 threads, a 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache, a 10 MB shared L3 cache, a base clock of 1.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, is a mobile-focused chip. Its 15 W TDP indicates a power-efficient design for thin and light laptops. The benchmark data for the Core 3 100U shows a percentile ranking of 70 against all CPUs, which places it above the Core i9-14901TE's percentile of 50, but this comparison is based on the Core 3 100U having recorded benchmark scores while the Core i9-14901TE has none.
For users who need maximum multi-core performance in a desktop system, the Core i9-14901TE is the clear choice from the specification data. For mobile computing where power efficiency is a priority, the Core 3 100U is the appropriate option. The lack of benchmark scores for the Core i9-14901TE means that the recorded data cannot confirm its performance advantage, but the architectural advantages are evident from the specifications.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The core counts are 6 for the Core 3 100U and 8 for the Core i9-14901TE. The thread counts are 8 and 16 respectively. The base clocks are 1.20 GHz for the Core 3 100U and 2.30 GHz for the Core i9-14901TE. The boost clocks are 4.70 GHz and 5.50 GHz respectively.
The TDP values are 15 W for the Core 3 100U and 45 W for the Core i9-14901TE. The sockets are Intel BGA 1744 for the mobile chip and Intel Socket 1700 for the desktop chip. The codenames are Raptor Lake-U and Raptor Lake-R respectively. The generations are listed as Core 3 (Raptor Lake-U) and Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh).
The L2 cache per core is 1.25 MB on the Core 3 100U and 2 MB on the Core i9-14901TE. The L3 cache is 10 MB shared on the Core 3 100U and 36 MB shared on the Core i9-14901TE. ECC memory support is false on the Core 3 100U and true on the Core i9-14901TE. The PCIe capabilities are Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the Core 3 100U and Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Core i9-14901TE.
The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 64EU on the Core 3 100U and UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i9-14901TE. The market segments are Mobile for the Core 3 100U and Desktop for the Core i9-14901TE. The die size is listed as 257 mm² only for the Core i9-14901TE. The release dates are 2024-01-07 for the Core 3 100U and 2024-06-30 for the Core i9-14901TE. The part numbers are SRMYL for the Core 3 100U and Q49CSRNJJ for the Core i9-14901TE.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has an empty benchmark list, and the head-to-head comparison table is also empty. This means direct numerical comparison is impossible from the recorded measurements.
The Intel Core 3 100U has a full set of benchmark scores. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1070 in multicore and 150 in singlecore. In Cinebench R20, it scores 4462 in multicore and 629 in singlecore. In Cinebench R23, it scores 10624 in multicore and 1499 in singlecore. In PassMark tests, the Core 3 100U scores 136497 in data compression, 8128 in data encryption, 7894 in extended instructions, 52 in find prime numbers, 28322 in floating point math, 39580 in integer math, 12522 in multithread, 876 in physics, 15191 in random string sorting, and 3506 in single thread.
The average benchmark score for the Core 3 100U is 16148. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the Intel Core i7-10850H with an average score of 16204 and a delta percentage of -0.3, the Intel Core i5-10600KF with an average score of 16228 and a delta percentage of -0.5, the Intel Core i7-1260U with an average score of 16320 and a delta percentage of -1.1, and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600H with an average score of 16341 and a delta percentage of -1.2. These deltas show the Core 3 100U is slightly behind all four rivals, with the smallest gap at 0.3 percent and the largest at 1.2 percent.
For the Core i9-14901TE, the average benchmark score is 0, and there are no nearest rivals listed. The percentile ranking of 50 indicates it sits at the midpoint of all CPUs, but this is based on no recorded benchmarks, so it may reflect only the specification-based ranking.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 3 100U wins in the mobile segment. Its 15 W TDP and BGA 1744 socket make it suitable for laptops. The recorded benchmark scores show it achieves a percentile ranking of 70 against all CPUs, which places it above many desktop processors from previous generations. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-10850H, which is a mobile H-series chip, and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, also a mobile processor. The Core 3 100U is within 1.2 percent of these rivals in average benchmark score, indicating competitive performance for its class.
The Intel Core i9-14901TE wins in the desktop segment. Its 45 W TDP and Socket 1700 make it a standard desktop part. The 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 36 MB L3 cache and 5.50 GHz boost clock, provide a strong foundation for multi-threaded desktop applications. The ECC memory support is a clear advantage for workstation or server-like use cases. The PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes offers higher bandwidth for modern expansion cards.
For single-threaded performance, the Core i9-14901TE has a higher boost clock at 5.50 GHz versus 4.70 GHz on the Core 3 100U. The base clock is also higher at 2.30 GHz versus 1.20 GHz. These clock advantages suggest the Core i9-14901TE should deliver better single-thread performance, though no benchmark confirms this.
For multi-threaded performance, the Core i9-14901TE has double the threads at 16 versus 8, a larger L2 cache per core, and a much larger L3 cache. The 2 MB per-core L2 cache and 36 MB shared L3 cache provide more data capacity for complex workloads. The Core 3 100U has a 10 MB shared L3 cache, which is smaller by 26 MB.
The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core 3 100U uses UHD Graphics 64EU. The data does not specify performance differences, but the model names indicate a different graphics configuration.
Power consumption is a key differentiator. The Core 3 100U at 15 W is designed for battery-powered devices, while the Core i9-14901TE at 45 W is for plugged-in desktops. This makes the Core 3 100U the better choice for portable systems, and the Core i9-14901TE the better choice for stationary systems where power draw is less of a concern.
The release timeline shows the Core 3 100U launched earlier in 2024, while the Core i9-14901TE launched later that year. The Core 3 100U has a launch MSRP of $426, while the Core i9-14901TE has no recorded MSRP.
In summary, the Core 3 100U wins for mobile computing with its low TDP and competitive benchmark scores among its peers. The Core i9-14901TE wins for desktop computing with its higher core counts, larger caches, faster clocks, and ECC support. The absence of benchmark data for the Core i9-14901TE means its actual performance remains unquantified in the database, but the specification sheet strongly favors it for heavy desktop workloads.