Intel Core 3 100HL vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are one-sided. The Intel Core i5-14401E wins all six recorded comparisons, with a consistent delta of approximately -17.7% against the Intel Core 3 100HL in five of the six tests. The single exception is the Cinebench R15 single-core run, where the delta is -17.8%, effectively identical.

In multi-core workloads, the Core i5-14401E scores 1830 in Cinebench R15, compared to 1506 for the Core 3 100HL. The R20 multicore test shows 7627 against 6278, and the R23 multicore result is 18161 versus 14948. Each of these represents the same -17.7% gap, indicating a stable performance margin across rendering workloads. The data shows the Core i5-14401E delivers roughly 18% higher multi-core throughput, a significant and repeatable advantage.

Single-core results follow the same pattern. The Core i5-14401E posts 258 in Cinebench R15 single-core versus 212 for the Core 3 100HL, a -17.8% difference. In R20 single-core, the scores are 1076 and 886, and in R23 single-core, 2564 and 2110. Both deltas are -17.7%. The consistency of this gap across generations of the Cinebench suite indicates the Core i5-14401E holds a uniform per-thread advantage, not merely a scaling benefit from additional cores.

The Core 3 100HL has no winning benchmark in this head-to-head set. Its zero wins and six losses place it clearly behind in every measured category. The average benchmark score field reinforces this: the Core 3 100HL records 23545, while the Core i5-14401E records 5253. However, these averages are not directly comparable because they are drawn from different test sets; the Core 3 100HL includes PassMark results, while the Core i5-14401E head-to-head list does not. The recorded head-to-head deltas are the reliable basis for comparison.

Percentile placement also separates the two. The Core 3 100HL sits at the 76th percentile against all CPUs, while the Core i5-14401E sits at the 60th. This is a curious inversion given the Core i5-14401E's clear benchmark wins. The explanation lies in the different benchmark pools: the Core 3 100HL's percentile is computed from a broader set including PassMark tests, where it scores strongly (for example, 202225 in data compression, 56308 in integer math), whereas the Core i5-14401E's percentile is based on a narrower Cinebench-only set. The percentile fields should not be read as contradicting the head-to-head results; the head-to-head deltas are the controlled comparison.

Nearest rival data provides context for each chip. The Core 3 100HL's closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, with a delta of 1.2%, followed by the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V at 1.1%. The Core i5-14401E's nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-13400T at 0.8%, with the Intel Core i9-10850K at 0.2%. These deltas confirm both chips sit in competitive mid-range territory, but the Core i5-14401E's rival set is populated by desktop parts, while the Core 3 100HL's rivals include mobile-oriented chips.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the Cinebench R23 multi-core test?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E wins with a score of 18161, against 14948 for the Intel Core 3 100HL, a delta of -17.7% in favor of the Core i5-14401E.

Q: Is the Intel Core 3 100HL faster in any single-core test?

A: No. The Core i5-14401E leads in all three single-core tests: R15 (258 versus 212, -17.8%), R20 (1076 versus 886, -17.7%), and R23 (2564 versus 2110, -17.7%).

Q: How do the core counts affect the head-to-head results?

A: The Core 3 100HL has 8 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite two fewer cores, the Core i5-14401E wins every multi-core benchmark, indicating its per-core efficiency and higher clocks outweigh the Core 3 100HL's core-count advantage.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The Core 3 100HL ranks at the 76th percentile against all CPUs, while the Core i5-14401E ranks at the 60th percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, compared to 4.60 GHz for the Intel Core 3 100HL.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The Core i5-14401E additionally supports ECC memory, while the Core 3 100HL does not.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in every benchmark category recorded in the head-to-head set. Multi-core rendering, single-core responsiveness, and all three Cinebench generations show the same -17.7% delta. This makes it the clear pick for any workload measured by Cinebench, including 3D rendering, video encoding, and CPU-bound simulation tasks. The consistent single-core advantage also favors it for lightly threaded applications like legacy software, spreadsheet calculations, and general desktop responsiveness.

The Intel Core 3 100HL, despite losing all head-to-head comparisons, has strengths visible outside that set. Its PassMark results are substantial: 202225 in data compression, 56308 in integer math, 42108 in floating point math, and 17586 in multithread. These scores are not part of the head-to-head comparison, but they indicate the Core 3 100HL handles data-heavy and math-intensive tasks competently in absolute terms. Its 8-core configuration provides more physical cores than the Core i5-14401E's 6, which may benefit workloads that scale with core count but are not represented in the Cinebench suite.

The Core 3 100HL also integrates Iris Xe Graphics 48EU, a more capable integrated GPU than the UHD Graphics 730 in the Core i5-14401E. For systems running without a discrete graphics card, the Core 3 100HL offers better integrated graphics performance, though no benchmark numbers are recorded for either iGPU in the database.

The Core i5-14401E wins on platform features. Its PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes doubles the lane count and generation versus the Core 3 100HL's PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. This matters for users connecting high-bandwidth devices such as modern SSDs or discrete GPUs. ECC memory support is another differentiator, making the Core i5-14401E suitable for error-sensitive computing environments.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ. The Core 3 100HL has 8 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. Thread counts are equal, but physical core counts favor the Core 3 100HL.

Clock speeds differ. The Core 3 100HL has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Core i5-14401E has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Core i5-14401E runs faster at both ends.

Thermal design power differs. The Core 3 100HL has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core i5-14401E has a TDP of 65 watts. The Core i5-14401E consumes more power, consistent with its higher clocks.

L2 cache differs. The Core 3 100HL has 2 MB per core, while the Core i5-14401E has 1.25 MB per core. The Core 3 100HL provides more L2 per core, but the Core i5-14401E has a larger L3 cache at 20 MB shared, versus 12 MB shared for the Core 3 100HL. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core.

The die size is recorded only for the Core i5-14401E at 215 mm²; no die size is listed for the Core 3 100HL. The process node is the same for both: 10 nm from Intel.

PCIe capabilities differ substantially. The Core 3 100HL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the Core i5-14401E uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. ECC memory support is present on the Core i5-14401E but absent on the Core 3 100HL.

Integrated graphics differ. The Core 3 100HL has Iris Xe Graphics 48EU, while the Core i5-14401E has UHD Graphics 730. Part numbers also differ: the Core i5-14401E has part number Q49JSRNJS, while the Core 3 100HL's part number is unknown.

Release dates differ. The Core 3 100HL released on 2024-04-07, while the Core i5-14401E released on 2024-06-30. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, but with different codenames. The Core 3 100HL uses Raptor Lake-PS, while the Core i5-14401E uses Raptor Lake-R. The Core i5-14401E is part of the Core 14th Gen series and is described as a Raptor Lake Refresh, whereas the Core 3 100HL is listed under the Core 3 generation with no series designation.

The process node is identical at 10 nm, and both are manufactured by Intel. The Core i5-14401E has a recorded die size of 215 mm²; no die size is recorded for the Core 3 100HL.

Cache architecture differs. The Core 3 100HL allocates 2 MB of L2 per core, which over 8 cores provides a larger aggregate L2 footprint. The Core i5-14401E allocates 1.25 MB per core, but its L3 cache is larger at 20 MB versus 12 MB. The total L3 for both is listed as shared, and no vCache is present on either.

The Core 3 100HL's Raptor Lake-PS codename and 45-watt TDP suggest a design tuned for power efficiency, while the Core i5-14401E's Raptor Lake-R codename and 65-watt TDP indicate a more conventional desktop power envelope. The Core i5-14401E's higher base and boost clocks align with this interpretation.

Memory support is identical: DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel. The Core i5-14401E adds ECC support, a feature absent from the Core 3 100HL. PCIe generation differs, with the Core i5-14401E supporting Gen 5 and the Core 3 100HL limited to Gen 4.

Both processors are locked, with no unlocked multiplier. Both are marked as Active in production status and target the desktop market segment. The Core 3 100HL has no recorded transistor count, and neither lists a total L3 figure beyond the shared values already noted.

The Verdict

The recorded data points clearly to the Intel Core i5-14401E as the higher-performing processor in every head-to-head benchmark. Its -17.7% delta advantage across five tests and -17.8% in one single-core test is uniform and substantial. Users prioritizing raw CPU throughput in Cinebench-style workloads should select the Core i5-14401E.

The Core i5-14401E also offers platform advantages that extend beyond raw compute. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes provides double the bandwidth and lane count of the Core 3 100HL's PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation or server use cases. Its 65-watt TDP and higher clocks (2.50 GHz base, 4.70 GHz boost) align with a desktop-first design philosophy.

The Core 3 100HL's case rests on its 8-core configuration, 45-watt TDP, and integrated Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. The lower power draw suits compact or thermally constrained systems, and the more capable iGPU benefits builds without discrete graphics. Its PassMark results, while outside the head-to-head set, show strong performance in data compression (202225) and integer math (56308), suggesting it handles general productivity tasks well.

The percentile rankings complicate a simple verdict. The Core 3 100HL sits at the 76th percentile, while the Core i5-14401E sits at the 60th. This does not negate the head-to-head results; it reflects different benchmark pools. Buyers should weight the controlled head-to-head deltas more heavily than the percentile fields when comparing these two directly.

For users who need maximum Cinebench performance, higher PCIe bandwidth, and ECC support, the Intel Core i5-14401E is the data-backed choice. For users who need lower power consumption, more physical cores, and a stronger integrated GPU, the Intel Core 3 100HL has measurable advantages, though none appear in the head-to-head win column. The data shows two differently positioned Raptor Lake parts, with the Core i5-14401E dominating the shared benchmark suite.