Intel Celeron G6900E vs Intel Core i5-3570 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data splits this comparison into two distinct categories: Cinebench and Geekbench. Across the six Cinebench tests, the Intel Core i5-3570 wins every round, with margins ranging from 13.1% to 13.6%. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i5-3570 scores 421 against the Celeron G6900E’s 366, a 13.1% advantage. The single-core R15 result shows 59 versus 51, a 13.6% gap. Moving to Cinebench R20, the i5-3570 leads by 13.3% in both multicore (1758 vs 1525) and single-core (248 vs 215). The R23 suite follows the same pattern: multicore scores of 4187 versus 3632 and single-core scores of 591 versus 512, each showing a 13.3% to 13.4% deficit for the Celeron.

The Geekbench results reverse the trend dramatically. In Geekbench multicore, the Celeron G6900E scores 2702 against the i5-3570’s 2251, a 20% lead. The single-core Geekbench test is even more lopsided: the Celeron posts 1561 versus 770, a 102.7% advantage, meaning it more than doubles the i5-3570’s score. This split suggests the two processors excel under different workload types, with the older Ivy Bridge chip holding steady in Cinebench while the newer Alder Lake design dominates in Geekbench’s single-threaded and memory-sensitive tests.

Overall, the i5-3570 wins 6 of the 8 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Celeron G6900E takes 2. The average benchmark score for the Celeron is 1321, placing it in the 35th percentile of all CPUs. The i5-3570 averages 1286, also in the 35th percentile, so the aggregate data shows them at nearly identical performance tiers despite the divergent test results.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras and design philosophies. The Celeron G6900E uses the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-S codename, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It runs on Intel Socket 1700 and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The chip has 2 cores and 2 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and no boost clock. Its cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 710, and the PCIe interface is Gen 5. The production status is Active, with a release date of January 3, 2022.

The Core i5-3570 uses the Ivy Bridge architecture, built on a 22 nm process node. It fits Intel Socket 1155 and supports only DDR3 memory, also dual-channel. This chip provides 4 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy is older: 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The transistor count is 1,400 million on a 160 mm² die, while the Celeron does not list transistor or die size data. Integrated graphics are Intel HD 2500, PCIe is Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and the memory bandwidth is rated at 25.6 GB/s. The production status is End-of-life, with a release date of May 31, 2012.

The architectural gap is clear: the Celeron uses a modern node with newer memory and PCIe standards, while the i5-3570 relies on an older node but compensates with double the cores and a higher clock speed. The Celeron’s lack of a boost clock means it runs at a fixed 3.00 GHz, whereas the i5-3570 can reach 3.80 GHz under load. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570 wins 6 of the 8 recorded benchmarks. The Celeron G6900E wins the remaining 2, both in Geekbench tests.

Q: How large is the Geekbench single-core gap?

A: The Celeron G6900E scores 1561 in Geekbench single-core, while the i5-3570 scores 770. That is a 102.7% advantage for the Celeron, meaning its score is more than double the i5-3570’s.

Q: Does the i5-3570 lead in all Cinebench versions?

A: Yes. Across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, the i5-3570 wins both multicore and single-core tests, with margins between 13.1% and 13.6%.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Celeron G6900E has an average benchmark score of 1321, and the i5-3570 has an average of 1286. Both sit at the 35th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The Celeron G6900E supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the i5-3570 supports only DDR3. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The i5-3570 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The Celeron G6900E has 2 cores and 2 threads.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Celeron G6900E | Intel Core i5-3570 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 2 | 4 |

| Threads | 2 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | None | 3.80 GHz |

| TDP | 46 W | 77 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1155 |

| Architecture | Alder Lake | Ivy Bridge |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 22 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR3 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 25.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5 | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 | Intel HD 2500 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2022-01-03 | 2012-05-31 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $194 |

| Part Number | Not listed | SR0T7 |

The Verdict

The data does not point to a single winner; it depends on the workload. The Intel Core i5-3570 is the better choice for Cinebench-style rendering and multi-threaded tasks that scale with core count. Its 4 cores and 4 threads, combined with a 3.80 GHz boost clock, deliver consistent 13% leads across all Cinebench versions. For users running those specific workloads, the i5-3570 is the stronger performer.

The Intel Celeron G6900E is the better option for Geekbench-style single-threaded and memory-intensive applications. Its 102.7% single-core advantage and 20% multicore lead in Geekbench indicate that the newer Alder Lake architecture and DDR5 support provide substantial gains in that benchmark suite. The Celeron also runs at a much lower TDP of 46 W versus 77 W, which may matter for thermally constrained systems.

The aggregate average scores are nearly identical: 1321 for the Celeron and 1286 for the i5-3570, with both at the 35th percentile. The i5-3570’s nearest rival is the Core i5-4670R at a 0% delta, while the Celeron’s nearest rival is the Celeron G6900T at a 0% delta. Neither chip dominates the other across the board, so the decision hinges on which benchmark suite reflects the intended use case.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-3570 wins in all Cinebench tests, which are traditionally used for 3D rendering and animation workloads. Its 13.1% to 13.6% margins across R15, R20, and R23, in both single-core and multicore, suggest a consistent advantage in CPU-bound rendering tasks. The higher base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost up to 3.80 GHz likely contribute to this, along with the extra two physical cores.

The Intel Celeron G6900E wins in Geekbench, which measures a broader set of real-world scenarios including encryption, compression, and image processing. The 20% multicore lead and the 102.7% single-core lead are substantial. The Alder Lake architecture’s modern memory support, including DDR5, and its Gen 5 PCIe interface likely explain the Geekbench performance. The Celeron also has a lower TDP of 46 W, making it more suitable for power-conscious builds, and it remains in active production, whereas the i5-3570 has reached end-of-life.

In practical terms, the i5-3570 fits legacy systems on Socket 1155 with DDR3 memory, while the Celeron G6900E targets current Socket 1700 platforms with both DDR4 and DDR5 options. The i5-3570 carries a launch MSRP of $194, while the Celeron’s launch price is not recorded in the database. For users upgrading an older Ivy Bridge system, the i5-3570 is the known quantity. For new builds where Geekbench-style performance and lower power draw matter, the Celeron G6900E is the data-backed pick.