Intel Celeron G5920 vs Intel Core i5-4250U Comparison

# Intel Celeron G5920 vs Intel Core i5-4250U: Database Analysis

The comparison between the Intel Celeron G5920 and the Intel Core i5-4250U is a study in contrasting design goals. One is a desktop-focused budget processor with a high base clock, the other a low-power mobile chip built for efficiency. The benchmark data shows a clear split: the Celeron G5920 wins all five head-to-head tests, but the Core i5-4250U holds its own in single-threaded workloads. The results make sense when you examine their architectures and target markets.

Where Each One Wins - Use-Case Split

The Celeron G5920 is the clear winner in multi-core and multi-threaded workloads. Its two physical cores, two threads, and high 3.50 GHz base clock deliver significantly higher scores in every multi-core test. The Core i5-4250U, despite having two cores and four threads, suffers from a much lower 1.30 GHz base clock and a 2.60 GHz boost clock, and it falls behind in every multi-threaded benchmark.

The Core i5-4250U wins in single-core efficiency and power consumption. It has a 15 W TDP compared to the Celeron's 58 W, making it a far better choice for thermally constrained, battery-powered systems. Its integrated graphics, the Intel HD 5000, is a more capable iGPU than the Celeron's UHD 610. The Core i5 is a mobile part, designed for thin-and-light laptops, while the Celeron is a desktop part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors belong to different architectural generations and market segments. The Core i5-4250U is based on the Haswell architecture, built on a 22 nm process. The Celeron G5920 uses the Comet Lake architecture, built on a 14 nm process node. The Core i5 integrates 1,400 million transistors on a 118 mm² die. The Celeron's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The Core i5-4250U has three cache levels: 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, plus a 3 MB shared L3 cache. The Celeron G5920 has a 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, plus a smaller 2 MB shared L3 cache. The Celeron has a larger L3 cache per core: 1 MB per core versus 0.75 MB per core for the Core i5.

Memory support differs. The Core i5-4250U supports DDR3 memory, while the Celeron G5920 supports DDR4. The Celeron also features dual-channel memory support and a 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth, figures not listed for the Core i5. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

Connectivity is a major point of difference. The Celeron G5920 uses Intel Socket 1200 and supports Gen 3 PCIe with 16 lanes for the CPU. The Core i5-4250U uses Intel BGA 1168 and no PCIe support is listed. The Celeron is a desktop part, the Core i5 is a mobile part, which shows in their sockets and expansion capabilities.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The entire head-to-head record is one-sided. The Celeron G5920 wins all five benchmark comparisons in the database. The largest margins are in multi-core tests, where the Celeron's high clock speed and desktop power envelope matter most.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Celeron G5920 scores 2252, which is 24.4% higher than the Core i5-4250U's 1811. That is the largest percentage advantage in the entire test set. The Celeron also takes Cinebench R20 multi-core by 24.3%, posting 945 versus the Core i5's 760. The Celeron's architecture simply scales better under full multi-thread load.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Celeron G5920 scores 226, a 24.2% lead over the Core i5-4250U's 182. This is the second largest absolute margin behind the R23 multi-core test.

The single-core tests are closer. The Celeron G5920 wins Cinebench R23 single-core with 318 versus 255, a 24.7% advantage. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the Celeron scores 133 against the Core i5's 107, again a 24.3% lead. The pattern is consistent: the Celeron's much higher base clock and its desktop power budget make it quicker even in lightly threaded tests.

The Core i5-4250U's best result in the database is actually a loss by a smaller margin. Its 742 in Geekbench single-core is only 0.2% behind the Celeron-like Xeon E5450's 754, but in the nearest rival list, that is the closest competitor. The Celeron G5920, however, is not in the nearest rival list. The Celeron's 24% lead in the Cinebench single-core tests is its largest single-core win.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU wins in multi-threaded tasks?

A: The Intel Celeron G5920 always wins multi-core tests. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 2252, a 24.4% lead over the Core i5-4250U's 1811. The reason is the Celeron's 3.50 GHz base clock versus the Core i5's 1.30 GHz base clock and 2.60 GHz boost clock.

Q: Is the Core i5-4250U better for single-threaded performance?

A: No, the Celeron G5920 still wins single-core benchmarks. It scores 318 in Cinebench R23 single-core against 255 for the Core i5-4250U, a 24.7% lead. The Core i5's higher boost clock cannot make up the Celeron's base clock advantage.

Q: What are the main architecture differences?

A: The Core i5-4250U is a Haswell 22 nm mobile chip with a 3 MB shared L3 cache and an Intel HD 5000 iGPU. The Celeron G5920 is a Comet Lake 14 nm desktop chip with a 2 MB shared L3 cache and UHD 610 graphics. They use different sockets (BGA 1168 for the Core i5, Socket 1200 for the Celeron) and different memory types (DDR3 vs DDR4).

Q: Are these CPUs in the same market segment?

A: No. The Core i5-4250U is a mobile processor for laptops with a 15 W TDP. The Celeron G5920 is a desktop chip with a 58 W TDP. The Celeron has a much higher power envelope, which allows it to run at a higher clock speed, and it is meant for desktop systems.

The Verdict

From the recorded data alone, the choice is clear: the Intel Celeron G5920 is the faster CPU in every benchmark in the database. Five out of five head-to-head wins. For anyone building a desktop system, and the motherboard has a Socket 1200, the Celeron's multi-core lead of 24.4% in Cinebench R23 multi-core is a real-world advantage in modern multi-threaded applications.

The Intel Core i5-4250U is not without its merits. It is a 15 W mobile part, and its 3 MB L3 cache is larger than the Celeron's 2 MB. The HD 5000 is a more capable integrated graphics processor. It is the better pick for a low-power mobile system, but in raw CPU compute, the Celeron dominates. The data says, on the whole, the desktop chip wins.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Celeron G5920 | Intel Core i5-4250U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |

| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 1.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | None | 2.60 GHz |

| L3 Cache | 2 MB (shared) | 3 MB (shared) |

| Process | 14 nm | 22 nm |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | Intel BGA 1168 |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD 610 | HD 5000 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2020-04-29 | 2013-06-03 |

| Part Number | SRH42 | SR16M |