Intel Atom x7425E vs Intel Core i7-3770T Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-3770T records an average benchmark score of 1314, while the Intel Atom x7425E records 1273. The i7-3770T sits 0.2% above the AMD Athlon Gold 7220U in the database, while the Atom x7425E is statistically tied with the Intel Core i5-4430S at a 0% delta.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The Core i7-3770T scores 4611 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, beating the Atom x7425E's 4403 by 4.7%. This is the smallest multi-core gap between the two, showing the Atom is closest in heavily threaded workloads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Core i7-3770T boosts to 3.70 GHz, while the Atom x7425E boosts to 3.40 GHz. The base clocks are far apart: the i7-3770T runs at 2.50 GHz base, while the Atom lists a 1500 base clock.

Q: Do both processors support integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both have integrated graphics. The Core i7-3770T uses Intel HD 4000, while the Atom x7425E uses UHD Graphics 24EU. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The Atom x7425E has a TDP of 12 watts, compared to 45 watts for the Core i7-3770T. The Atom draws a fraction of the power, which aligns with its mobile market segment.

Q: Which processor has the higher percentile ranking?

A: Both processors sit at the 35th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Despite their architectural differences, they land in the same performance tier overall.

Architecture Differences

The Core i7-3770T is built on Intel's Ivy Bridge architecture using a 22 nm process node, fabricated by Intel with 1,400 million transistors on a 160 mm² die. It is a desktop part from the Core i7 generation, released on 2012-04-28. The chip features 4 cores and 8 threads, with 64 KB L1 cache per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR3 over a dual-channel bus, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Its socket is Intel Socket 1155, and it integrates Intel HD 4000 graphics. The part number is SR0PQ.

The Atom x7425E, by contrast, uses Alder Lake-N architecture with Gracemont cores on a 10 nm process. It is a mobile part released on 2023-01-02 and remains active in production. It also has 4 cores but only 4 threads, meaning no hyper-threading. Cache layout differs significantly: 96 KB L1 per core, 2 MB shared L2, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, but only on a single-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. PCIe is Gen 3 with 9 lanes. It uses Intel BGA 1264 socket and integrates UHD Graphics 24EU. The part number is SRMLN, and its launch MSRP is $58.

The architectural gap is stark: Ivy Bridge is a 2012 desktop design with a large L3 and dual-channel memory, while Alder Lake-N is a 2023 low-power mobile design with a newer process node but a smaller shared L2/L3 and single-channel memory. The Atom's smaller TDP (12 vs. 45 watts) reflects its embedded/mobile target, while the i7-3770T's higher TDP enables a higher base clock and more memory bandwidth headroom. The thread count difference (8 vs. 4) is a major architectural split, as the i7-3770T can process twice as many threads simultaneously.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Across all six recorded benchmark tests, the Intel Core i7-3770T wins every round. The victories are consistent, with deltas ranging from 4.7% to 5.0%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-3770T scores 464 against the Atom's 443, a 4.7% advantage. Single-core R15 shows 65 vs. 62, a 4.8% edge. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 1936 vs. 1849 (4.7%), and single-core is 273 vs. 260 (5.0%). Cinebench R23 multi-core closes the gap slightly: 4611 vs. 4403, still a 4.7% win. The single-core R23 result is 651 vs. 621, a 4.8% margin.

The largest single delta is in Cinebench R20 single-core, where the i7-3770T leads by 5.0%. The smallest deltas are in the multi-core tests, all at 4.7%. This pattern suggests that the Atom's Gracemont cores are relatively competitive in multi-threaded workloads, but the i7-3770T's hyper-threading and higher clocks give it a consistent edge in single-threaded tasks. The Geekbench results are only recorded for the i7-3770T (1916 multi-core, 592 single-core), so no head-to-head comparison is possible there.

The database also shows nearest rivals for context. The i7-3770T's closest competitor is the AMD Athlon Gold 7220U (0.2% higher average score), followed by the Intel Core i5-4570R (-0.3%), Intel Celeron G6900E (-0.5%), and Intel Celeron G6900T (-0.5%). The Atom x7425E's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-4430S (0% delta), Intel Core i5-4670T (0.2% higher), Intel Core i3-1005G1 (0.6% higher), and Intel Xeon W-2102 (0.7% higher). These rival comparisons show that both chips sit in a similar performance neighborhood, but the i7-3770T edges out the Atom in every direct benchmark.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-3770T | Intel Atom x7425E |

|----------------|---------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 4 |

| Threads | 8 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 1500 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.70 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 12 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1155 | Intel BGA 1264 |

| Architecture | Ivy Bridge | Alder Lake |

| Codename | Ivy Bridge | Alder Lake-N |

| Process Node | 22 nm | 10 nm |

| Transistors | 1,400 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 160 mm² | Not listed |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 38.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 3, 9 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 | UHD Graphics 24EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Production Status | Not listed | Active |

| Release Date | 2012-04-28 | 2023-01-02 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $58 |

The core count is identical at 4, but the i7-3770T doubles the threads to 8. The Atom has a lower TDP by 33 watts, a newer process node (10 nm vs. 22 nm), and supports newer memory types (DDR4/DDR5 vs. DDR3). However, the Atom's single-channel memory bus and 9 PCIe lanes limit bandwidth compared to the i7-3770T's dual-channel bus and 16 lanes. The i7-3770T has a larger L3 cache (8 MB vs. 6 MB) and a smaller L1 per core (64 KB vs. 96 KB), while the Atom moves L2 to a 2 MB shared pool instead of per-core 256 KB.

Where Each One Wins

The Core i7-3770T wins every benchmark in the head-to-head set, making it the clear performance leader in raw compute. Its hyper-threading gives it 8 threads, which directly benefits multi-threaded rendering workloads. The dual-channel memory bus also provides broader memory bandwidth for data-intensive tasks, though the database does not record a bandwidth figure for the i7-3770T. The higher boost clock (3.70 GHz vs. 3.40 GHz) contributes to its single-core wins, which are consistent at 4.8% to 5.0% over the Atom. For desktop users with access to Intel Socket 1155 motherboards, the i7-3770T offers the stronger all-around benchmark profile.

The Atom x7425E wins on power efficiency, with a 12 W TDP compared to 45 W. That makes it suitable for low-power mobile or embedded designs where thermal and energy constraints matter more than peak performance. Its newer 10 nm process and support for DDR4/DDR5 memory are modern advantages, and its active production status means it remains available for new designs. The single-channel memory bus and 4 threads limit its throughput, but for lightweight workloads, the Atom's 4.7% deficit in multi-core Cinebench R23 is modest. The Atom also has a recorded memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, a specification the i7-3770T does not list.

The database's percentile rankings place both at 35%, confirming they occupy the same overall tier. The i7-3770T's average benchmark score of 1314 is 41 points higher than the Atom's 1273, a 3.2% advantage in aggregate. In the nearest rival comparisons, the i7-3770T hangs with the AMD Athlon Gold 7220U (0.2% apart), while the Atom matches the Intel Core i5-4430S exactly. Neither chip is a top-tier performer, but the i7-3770T is consistently ahead.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-3770T wins all six head-to-head benchmarks, with deltas between 4.7% and 5.0%. It also holds a higher average benchmark score (1314 vs. 1273) and a higher boost clock (3.70 GHz vs. 3.40 GHz). Anyone seeking maximum compute performance from these two options should choose the i7-3770T. Its 8 threads, dual-channel memory, and larger L3 cache make it the superior processor for multi-threaded rendering, single-threaded responsiveness, and general desktop workloads. The 45 W TDP is higher, but the performance payoff is clear in every recorded test.

The Intel Atom x7425E is the choice for power-constrained or mobile designs. Its 12 W TDP is 33 watts lower than the i7-3770T, and it supports modern DDR4/DDR5 memory with a recorded 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. It remains in active production, while the i7-3770T's production status is not listed. The Atom's 4.7% deficit in multi-core Cinebench R23 is its best showing, indicating that its Gracemont cores handle parallel workloads reasonably well. For embedded systems, fanless designs, or battery-powered devices where every watt matters, the Atom is the appropriate pick.

For everyone else, the verdict is straightforward: the i7-3770T is the faster part in every measured category. The data shows no scenario where the Atom outperforms it in raw benchmarks. The only reason to select the Atom is efficiency or platform compatibility, not performance. Given that both processors sit at the 35th percentile, buyers should weigh the i7-3770T's 3.2% average score advantage against the Atom's 12 W operating envelope. The database records zero benchmark wins for the Atom, so performance-minded users should default to the Core i7-3770T.